and gtk_image_set_can_shrink().
Images are meant to always be icon-sized, they can never shrink below
that.
And images are icons, so they are meant to be square. If they are
not, we pretned that's by accident and keep aspect ratio.
This is an automated change doing these command:
git sed -f g gtk_widget_set_has_window gtk_widget_set_has_surface
git sed -f g gtk_widget_get_has_window gtk_widget_get_has_surface
git sed -f g gtk_widget_set_parent_window gtk_widget_set_parent_surface
git sed -f g gtk_widget_get_parent_window gtk_widget_get_parent_surface
git sed -f g gtk_widget_set_window gtk_widget_set_surface
git sed -f g gtk_widget_get_window gtk_widget_get_surface
git sed -f g gtk_widget_register_window gtk_widget_register_surface
git sed -f g gtk_widget_unregister_window gtk_widget_unregister_surface
git checkout NEWS*
That's kinda weird but allows us to delete the texture case from
GtkIconHelper and GTK_IMAGE_TEXTURE from the GtkImageType enum.
And it doesn't cause any other problems because the cell renderer
can't deal with paintables - otherwise it would mirror GtkImage and have
a "paintable" property instead.
If set, the image will draw its contents while keeping their aspect
ratio. That means empty areas show up on the top/bottom or left/right.
Also move the special-case snapshotting code for icons to
GtkIconHelper. That's where it belongs.
This only implements the vfuncs, but does not actually emit signals
yet.
It's also not useed for anything other than snapshot() so far, this
will come in later commits.
Instead of loading them into surfaces (which we want to get rid of), we
load into textures.
In fact, we introduce a new paintable subclass called a GtkScaler that
takes care of tracking scaling.
This also ideally gets rid of an extra conversion once renderers learn
to render textures directly.
Remove all the old 2.x and 3.x version annotations.
GTK+ 4 is a new start, and from the perspective of a
GTK+ 4 developer all these APIs have been around since
the beginning.
We no longer support registering custom icon sizes, so
we can make these properties just enums. This also lets
us specify them by nick in ui files. Nice!
Instead of looking at the icon size, look at the CSS value for
-gtk-icon-size. Set style classes depending on icon size instead.
Trivially change Adwaita and HighContrast to report the same values as
before.
Instead, add a function gtk_image_set_icon_size() for the cases where
overriding the icon size is necessary.
Treat icon sizes the same way as pixel sizes, too. So gtk_image_clear()
no longer unsets the icon size.
Instead of returning the icon size with them, make
gtk_image_get_icon_name() and gtk_image_get_gicon() only return the icon
itself.
As a benefit, we can turn them into regular getters that return values
instead of requiring out parameters.
Instead, provide gtk_image_get_icon_size() to query the icon size.
These are no longer used, instead we always covert to surface as
early as possible and drop the pixbuf.
This means we never store both the pixbuf and the surface at
for any longer time, which is wasteful. Also, its one step further
to drop GdkPixbufs from generic use in our APIs.
This drops the pixbuf property and the pixbuf getters. We keep
gtk_image_new/set_from_pixbuf, but these are small helpers that
immediately convert to a surface, and there is no way to later get
back the pixbuf you passed in.
The from file/resource codepaths are also changed to load a surface
instead of a pixbuf.
This patch makes that work using 1 of 2 options:
1. Add all missing enums to the switch statement
or
2. Cast the switch argument to a uint to avoid having to do that (mostly
for GdkEventType).
I even found a bug while doing that: clearing a GtkImage with a surface
did not notify thae surface property.
The reason for enabling this flag even though it is tedious at times is
that it is very useful when adding values to an enum, because it makes
GTK immediately warn about all the switch statements where this enum is
relevant.
And I expect changes to enums to be frequent during the GTK4 development
cycle.
It's not a GtkCssGadget anymore, it doesn't have any properties or
signals either and it's not public. Further, its lifetime is very clear
the way it's being used inside GTK+.
Since setting a clip is mandatory for almost all widgets, we can as well
change the size-allocate signature to include a out_clip parameter, just
like GtkCssGadget did. And since we now always propagate baselines, we
might as well pass that one on to size-allocate.
This way we can also make sure to transform the clip returned from
size-allocate to parent-coordinates, i.e. the same coordinate space
priv->allocation is in.
