That test is not working anymore by design since commit 57c4f01e.
It was introduced pre-3.0.0 in commit 12d6b588 and the feature was never
utilized. So it seems safe to just remove the test.
This tests just a few basic things for now. Mainly, that we don't
emit redundant notifications for enum, flags, int and boolean
properties. It also checks that we do emit the expected notifications
when the value actually changes. This is checked for string, double
and float properties as well.
There is a large number of exceptions in the test, and a lot more
checks that could be done. One class of exceptions is all the places
where we have -set booleans to go along with another property. We
should have a dedicated test for these pairs. Another class of
exceptions is where naked objects created by g_object_new () just
don't have the full functionality - e.g. a tree selection without
a tree view does not work very well. We set up the instance object
better for these situations.
This tests both a sequence being claimed early to be then denied
(and handled deeper in propagation chain), and a sequence being
claimed late in the capture phase (and thus being cancelled deeper
in the propagation chain)
Before this change, a sequence being claimed deep in the event propagation
chain would make the sequence go denied on every ancestor, regardless of
previous state.
To make things more consistent, only deny the sequence if it was previously
claimed, so the behavior is the same for gesture groups within the widget
than for those outside the widget.
The gestures testsuite has been updated to reflect this new behavior.
It might happen that a gesture claims a sequence before any other gesture
in its group even handled a single event from that sequence. In that case,
ensure the state is set accordingly right when the sequence is handled in
those.
The "group" gesture testcase has been updated to observe this behavior.
This test just checks that all the icon names that GTK uses are present
in the default icon theme.
As icon names are not checked programmatically and we do not want to run
into missing-icon icons in the code, this test seems necessary.
For now, it's just a stub that tests stock icons.
To make the icontheme test run successfully when installed,
we need to use the correct test-framework-provided location,
and we need to install the test theme without stripping its
subdirectory structure.
Added GTK_BUILDER_ERROR_INVALID_PROPERTY and GTK_BUILDER_ERROR_INVALID_SIGNAL
error codes
ObjectInfo: Use a GType instead of a char * for the class name.
PropertyInfo: Use a GParamSpec instead of a char * for the property name.
SignalInfo: Use signal id and detail quark instead of a detailed signal name string.
This not only save us a few malloc in each case but lets us simplify the code
and report unknown properties and signals as a parsing error instead of just
printing a warning.
Binding an object sensitive property with a check button active property will look like this:
<object class="GtkButton" id="button">
<property name="sensitive" bind-source="checkbutton" bind-property="active"/>
</object>
This is based on the original work done by Denis Washington for his GSoC project
This closes Bug 654417 "[GSoC] Add <binding> element to GtkBuilder syntax"
