...on Windows 8+ and when the system setting for non-Unicode programs do
not match the language version of Windows by falling back to using Pango.
This ensures that the correct font is used during these scenarios, so that
we minimize the risk of seeing garbled characters for texts that the system
code page does not support due to system peculiarties. There might be a
way to support gtk-font-name handling using the native Windows APIs
directly on Windows 8+, but that needs to be investigated.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=726298
The compositing that is meant here is really specific to the
X11 Composite extension, and does not apply to Wayland.
This is very rarely used functionality anyway, and none of
the other backends support it.
Theoretically, we apply the shape mask client-side ourselves
with an ARGB32 pixmap and intersect it to get a union shape,
but I don't particularly care enough to write that code.
Realistic application code using bounding shapes in 2014 is
quite rare.
It seems that some backends implemented get_root_origin wrong
and returned the client window coordinates, not the frame window
coordinates. Since it's possible to implement generically for all
windows, let's do that instead of having a separate impl vfunc.
Lots of code, including dragging code in GtkWindow, use these
fields. Setting them to 0 causes lots of strange and weird bugs.
Use the same "hack" from query_device_state of just using
win_x / win_y for now. We'll convert this to the proper fake root
coordinate system used by get_root_coords in the next commit.
And the counterpart to unmaximize when dragging a maximized window, if
touch devices aren't going to use EWMH moveresize, having this one at least
makes things feel a bit less awkward.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=709914
Sadly, EWMH moveresize mechanism can't work with touch devices for two
reasons:
1) As a mutter implementation detail, the device is queried in order
to check whether the dragging button is still pressed. Touch devices
won't report the button 1 being pressed through pointer emulation.
2) Even bypassing that check, on X11 touch events are selected prior
to sequences being started, either through XISelectEvents or
XIGrabTouchBegin, no late registering through active grabs is allowed,
as WMs do on reaction to EWMH moveresize messages.
So for the time being, make touch devices fallback on emulated window
dragging, which at least allows for moving windows.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=709914
Add gdk_device_get_last_event_window(), and use to implement the window
tracking we need for synthesizing crossing events for sensitivity changes
and gtk grabs, rather than keeping the information in qdata and updating
it based when GTK+ gets events.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=726187
eb1ab0dac2 removed support for authentication
based on crypt()-hashed passwords but it didn't remove the header.
Finish up with the removal.
This allows the broadway backend to build on FreeBSD (which has no
crypt.h).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=726149
window->x / window->y are in "root window coordinates", e.g. relative
to the topmost toplevel. However, the coordinates in get_xdg_popup are
relative to the passed-in surface, so we need to do the reverse
translation here.
We have a hack in the XSETTINGS code to substitute gtk-xft-dpi
with gdk-unscaled-dpi unless the screen has a fixed window scale,
in which case we just use gtk-xft-dpi.
But if the screen is changed to have a fixed window scale, then
the substituted value of gdk-unscaled-dpi will stick around until
the next (coincidental) change to XSETTINGS. To fix this, force
an immediate reread of the XSETTINGS property when
gdk_x11_display_set_window_scale() is used.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725754
The point of GdkWindowImpl::get_root_coords is to translate the passed
in coordinates against the passed-in impl window. For a child window,
in fact, window->abs_x and window->abs_y already track the child
window's coordinates against the impl window.
If we pass in a child window, and backends don't explicitly get the impl
window from it, we'll double-count the child window.
Really, we should *always* be passing impl windows to backends, and
never child windows. However, I'm a bit worried for regressions late
in the cycle if we want to fix up the rest of the callers, like
gdk_window_get_geometry, so I'm only going to touch get_root_coords
for now after careful review of all the backends.
GtkWindow calls set_shadow_width then maps the window, meaning
that we never set the margin. Save it when we set and then set
it when we create the XDG surface.
Instead of destroying the surface in the backend if this is
unable to resize, let the core code do it, and do it properly.
Based on a patch by Benjamin Otte.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725172
The code in GDK is incredibly broken and nobody is quite sure what's
right-side-up and what's upside down, but this breaks mutter-wayland
now, so let's remove it. It might leak, but we should probably do a
full restructuring of GDK drawing to fix it.
Like in other backends (except X) we can't resize cairo image surfaces
so let's sync the code here with what the other backends do.
This prevents the painting machinery above us to paint on the wrong
buffer.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=724968
We can't destroy buffers if they're in-use by the compositor. Well,
technically we can, but that is considered undefined by Wayland and
mutter won't cope with it very well -- it simply kills the client.
To solve this, we need to delay the destroy operation until the
compositor tells us that it's released the buffer. To do this, hold
an extra ref on the cairo surface as long as the surface is in-use
by the compositor.
This prevents warnings like
(gtk3-demo:14948): Gdk-CRITICAL **: _gdk_frame_clock_thaw: assertion 'GDK_IS_FRAME_CLOCK (clock)' failed
(gtk3-demo:14948): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_frame_clock_get_timings: assertion 'GDK_IS_FRAME_CLOCK (frame_clock)' failed
We need to do this, as the compositor might have already sent us a frame
event, in-flight, at the same time we destroy our window. In this case, we'll
receive the then-in-flight "done" event, and then warn as we try to look
up the frame clock on a destroyed window.
