There are three bugs here:
- we should check if the value type is transformable instead of being
compatible, since that's all we care about in order to call
g_value_transform()
- the check is only meaningful in the direction
passed-in-type->column-type and not viceversa
- we should init the destination GValue to the column type before
calling g_value_transform on it, or the destination type information
will be missing and the method will fail
Thanks to Jasper St. Pierre and Colin Walters for all the help in
tracking this down.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=677649
There are three bugs here:
- we should check if the value type is transformable instead of being
compatible, since that's all we care about in order to call
g_value_transform()
- the check is only meaningful in the direction
passed-in-type->column-type and not viceversa
- we should init the destination GValue to the column type before
calling g_value_transform on it, or the destination type information
will be missing and the method will fail
Thanks to Jasper St. Pierre and Colin Walters for all the help in
tracking this down.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=677649
gtk_icon_info_load_symbolic checks for the existance of a filename parameter
so it can include it along with the stylesheet. We don't set the filename
parameter when creating the info for a GFileIcon, for some reason.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=676356
This is probably going to be replaced by something different soon, but
in the meantime, fix this annoying bug, visible e.g. in widget-factory
for left/right tab examples.
As used in Totem and gnome-contacts. The widget
takes either a GtkMenu or a GMenuModel to construct
its menu, and can be given a parent widget to use to
position the drop-down (as used in GtkMenuToolButton).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=668013
When we determine the fill rectangle for an image layer, and the image
is not repeating, we should also position the rectangle according to the
values of background-position, or we will always fill a tiny slice at
the top/left of the clip box.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=677109
Many themes want to render the trough background/stroke thinner than the
full height/width (which is constructed around the value of the
'slider-width' style property).
Read and apply the CSS margin from the theme on the trough component, so
that themes can make it smaller at their will without the need to
override the render_background, render_frame and render_activity methods
of GtkThemingEngine.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=676196
https://bugzilla.redhat.com//show_bug.cgi?id=812035 has
a stacktrace that shows recursion via
free_node -> unref -> dispose -> ui manager api
which ends in a crash, since we run free_node over the entire
tree and it leaves lots of dangling pointers behind.
So, better be careful by setting all pointers to NULL after
freeing them.
To make setting output directory and filename simpler in the PrintToFile
dialog two gtkprintsettings have been added GTK_PRINT_SETTINGS_OUTPUT_DIR
and GTK_PRINT_SETTINGS_OUTPUT_BASENAME.
This will reduce the code needed to implement a better name than "output.pdf"
and actually makes more sense than the existing setting
GTK_PRINT_SETTINGS_OUTPUT_URI which doesn't work seamlessly with
GTK_PRINT_SETTINGS_OUTPUT_FILE_FORMAT like the new settings do.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=657322
Not setting a URI but catching the activate-link signal is a
valid use of GtkLinkButton, but we shouldn't allow showing a
popup menu which offers to copy the URI if there's none.
Turn dead_doubleacute plus space into '"' and not into a double
acute because that's the way to enter double quotes on the
US-International keyboard layout.
(cherry picked from commit 71164e57b9)
Code was using different places to compute the icon size when layouting
and when doing size requests. This resulted in non-matching behavior in
obscure cases. And that lead to iconviews that were too small.
This makes sure that if the gtk-im-module setting changes we update
our internal state immediately on the next event whichever it is.
In particular this fixes the case of the gtk-im-module setting
changing while the user is typing and the slave context remaining the
same, effectively ignoring the setting change.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=675365
Commit cdf473ec10 deprecated the style
properties associated with the container border width and box spacing of
the action and content areas, in favour of using
gtk_container_set_border_width() and gtk_box_set_spacing() on the
widgets themselves, but failed to initialize those values to the
defaults.
Makes name consistent with other quartz-only modules and makes it clear that this works with the GMenuModel system rather than the older GtkMenu system.
The window's role is 'GtkFileChooserDialog', so that window managers can match it
for positioning.
Signed-off-by: Federico Mena Quintero <federico@gnome.org>
This ensures that items stay left-aligned instead of slowly expanding into
empty space when widening the iconview. It's also what the iconview did
pre-refactoring.
Note that for cases where natural width != minimum width, the cells
might still expand and shrink back.
Always assume max-columns and min-rows. The old approach was kinda
insane.
As an example, try to write an algorithm that optimizes the minimum size
for infinite (take a reasonably large number like 2520) word-wrapped
Monospace text cells containing the text "XXXXX XXX XXX XXXXX" (keep in
mind that this is the easy problem, because it's assuming equal cell
renderers). There's 4 ways to reasonably lay out this text:
19 glyphs (19x1):
XXXXX XXX XXX XXXXX
18 glyphs (9x2):
XXXXX XXX
XXX XXXXX
21 glyphs (7x3):
XXXXX
XXX XXX
XXXXX
20 glyphs (5x4):
XXXXX
XXX
XXX
XXXXX
The best thing to do usually is using the 9x2 approach, but that's
neither the one using the natural nor the one using the minimum size.
As a side note, this does not include spacing and padding, which might
also influence the decision. Nor does it include height-for-width
considerations. Look at this table (numbers given in glyphs, not pixels,
as for pixel-sizes it gets even more interesting):
given best solution
width columns sizing glyphs per cell
6 1 6x4 20
7 1 7x3 21
8 1 7x3 24
9 1 9x2 18
10 1/2 9x2/5x4 20
11 1/2 9x2/5x4 22
12 1/2 9x2/5x4 24
13 1/2 9x2/5x4 26
14 2 7x3 21
15 3 5x4 20
16 3 5x4 21.3
17 3 5x4 22.7
18 2 9x2 18
19 1/2 19x1/8x2 19
20 1/2/4 19x1/8x2/5x4 20
21 1-4 any 21
22 1-4 any 22
23 1-4 any 23
24 1-4 any 24
25 5 5x4 20
26 5 5x4 20.8
27 3 9x2 18
28 3 9x2 18.7
29 3 9x2 19.3
30 3/6 9x2/5x4 20
Now of course, nobody wants the number of columns to randomly change in
inexplicable ways while they enlarge or shrink an iconview, so we not
only have to optimize for smallest or other size measurements, but we
also have to optimize for "most pleasing to the eye".
And last but not least, I'd like to once again remind you - if you kept
up until now - that this discussion was for identically-sized cells
only.
Instead of just returning the last allocated numbers, we now compute the
proper sizes from scratch. This is a bit less trivial, but it results in
proper height-for-width handling.
This is a huge quest to remove all caching from GtkIconview to simplify
the code. As it turns out, iconview performance is a joke, so the caches
are kinda unnecessary.
If we need caching, we can add it in a useful way later.
If we use
&item->cell_area
instead of
(GdkRectangle *) item
there is no need anymore to keep the cell_area as the first member of
the the item. And we cget compile-time checks for changes to the item
struct.
It's wrong to hardcode the slider lines here; those should be rendered
as an additional background layer using background-image if the theme
specifies so.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=652304
Instead of setting it on the child scrolled window. This is needed
because the whole window's allocation must be equal to the one of the
entry (in case the popup-set-width property is TRUE); if we set the size
request on a children of the window, there might be other children with
borders/paddings in between the toplevel and the child we set the size
request too, which will break alignment.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=672947
This call was forcing needless work since gtk_window_map() already
does a gdk_window_show() which initially sets GDK_WINDOW_STATE_FOCUSED
that we then handle regularly on the widget's window state event
handler.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=673237
Since themes might want different paddings around the color sample
according to where it's being used, don't hardcode a 16px one here.
The theme can specify a padding to get the same effect.
Reported by Christian Persch <chpe@gnome.org>
On Windows, gtkwin32themeprivate.h is needed as
_gtk_win32_theme_get_default() is called on that platform to avoid C4013
warnings/errors (aka implicit declaration of ... for GCC folks).
See inline comments for what it does. Its main use is figuring out if
something has been caused by GTK's caching of CSS properties or if it's
a different problem.
GApplication now makes the session bus and object path available as a
public API on the application instance. Use that instead of trying to
guess values for ourselves.
This causes this version of Gtk+ to depend on GLib 2.32.2, so bumping
version dependency accordingly.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671249
We currently have a couple of cases where GtkApplication assumes that
the session bus will be non-NULL causing critical error output or (in
the case of trying to publish menus) an infinite loop.
Three fixes:
- if the session bus is NULL due to not having registered the
GtkApplication yet then give a g_critical on the entry point to the
menu setters instead of going into an infinite loop. Document this.
- check for NULL session bus even when calling the menu setters at the
right time in order to prevent the infinite loop for
non-programer-error cases (ie: because we had trouble connecting to
the session bus)
- check for NULL session bus when publishing the X11 properties on the
GtkApplicationWindow and skip publishing them if we're not on the bus
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671249
The way we use these style properties to set regular properties on
containers accessible from the public API is really just broken, and
could lead to undefined values for the spacing and border-width
container properties (since they could be set from public API and then
changed from under in a style_update handler from GTK).
Take this as an occasion to deprecate these style properties, which do
not make a lot of sense anyway, now that GtkInfoBar supports regular CSS
padding and border.
GtkPlug directly handles X KeyPress/Release events, instead of using
translation in GDK (which expects XI2 events for XI2). When this
was done, the handling of the group was stubbed out and never replaced.
Export gdk_keymap_x11_group_for_state() and gdk_keymap_x11_is_modifier()
so we can fill out the fields correctly.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=675167
InfoBar must take into account the border and padding when requesting
its allocation, since it is then drawing them. Besides, the border and
background should always be drawn, even when the message type is OTHER.
These need to be made independent of the xkb configuration somehow.
As things are now, they will either fail when run on a naked X
server in make check, or fail when run in my session.
Shift-click in the slider now starts a drag in 'fine adjustment'
mode, where we move the slider 10-times slower than the mouse.
This can be very helpful when scrolling through a very long document
or webpage, and moving the scrollbar even a single pixel already
jumps too far in the content.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=563688
It seems to be general consensus that button 1 should do the jumping,
so we now jump to the clicked position on primary button clicks and
page on secondary button clicks. Touch behaves like primary.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=563688
Symbolic icons use a "-symbolic" suffix to distinguish themselves from
highcolor variants. Note that the dash character here has a different
meaning than the specificity level defined in the icon-naming-spec [1],
as it identifies a property of the icon itself.
Since they might be provided by a parent theme (e.g. the HighContrast theme
relies on the gnome icon theme for them), when we are looking up one we
should first escape the generic icon inheritance mechanism defined in the
icon-naming-spec [1], and privilege a symbolic icon, if it exists in a
parent theme, before applying the inheritance evaluation.
This fixes symbolic icons not working properly when used in the
HighContrast theme with the GTK_ICON_LOOKUP_GENERIC_FALLBACK flag set.
[1]
http://standards.freedesktop.org/icon-naming-spec/latest/ar01s03.htmlhttps://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=674806
Avoid doing useless translations/rotations, since themes will most
likely set different CSS gradients using left/right/top/bottom style
classes, or use a plain color.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=674809
