The code assigning the display to the debug_flags struct gets only
called when the default display changes, which never happens
when there already is one.
This makes it call the change callback in case a display is already
there.
The same fix was applied to gtk3 in !26 where calling gdk_init()
before gtk_init() would trigger this case. With gdk_init() gone
in master this is less likely to happen, but still possible
if gdk_display_open() is called before gtk_init().
See https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/pygobject/issues/166
The Wayland backend was already not supporting this setting
since it is an XSetting that is not backed by a GSetting.
Drop this setting altogether, since we will stop supporting
general-purpose modules.
This exists to exit early for invisible lines. It attempts to use the
LineDisplay’s direction to create a corresponding PangoLayout. However,
the dir is not yet set by this point, & the display was new0()d, so its
dir is always 0 == TEXT_DIR_NONE. Thus, we always create an LTR layout.
Whatever the original intent, this outcome seems to be OK, so let’s make
the code say what it means, rather than using a misleading conditional.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=779099
All remaining users of that vfunc now implement snapshot using cairo
render nodes (win32 and radial).
Also, GtkCssImageClass.snapshot is now NULL, so if a subclass doesn't
implement it, it will now crash.
Previously it would try to call the draw vfunc.
This way, we avoid a 1px border at the bottom of the actual searchbar
widget and move it instead to the child of a GtkRevealer. Since we can
now use widgets with 0px height, we finally get rid of the 1px border
that was drawn even if the searchbar child was hidden.
Don't use the current layout size as minimum size anymore, that doesn't
make sense. Also move the code from size_request() from gtk2 into the
now current measure() function.
There's no reason to use a separate file until the format of the file
changes though, as this just means that GTK+ 3.x and GTK+ 4.x
applications would end up showing different bookmarks in the file
chooser.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=793425
The annotation (allow-none) is wrong. Since
gtk_tree_view_is_blank_at_pos() also calls
gtk_tree_view_get_path_at_pos(), the same fields should have the same
annotations.
Due to the recent changes introduced in glibc 2.27 "%OB" is the
correct format to obtain a month name as used in the calendar
header. The same rule has been working in BSD family (including
OS X) since 1990s. This change is simple but makes GTK+ 4.x require
glibc >= 2.27. If this requirement cannot be fulfilled then we must
cherry-pick the full commit cbf118c from gtk-3-22 branch.
Closes: #9
The other method annotations were removed in commit c306e448b3.
There is no introspected ABI change, as g-ir-scanner would just ignore
the annotation.
This eliminates the last warning when building GTK on Linux.
When building dependencies as subprojects we need to tell the
introspection scanner where to find the introspection data; this
means using GIR targets from the subproject.
Functional revert of commit 9c4892f291.
Fixes introspection scanner warnings like:
Warning: Gtk: gtk_drag_finish: Methods must belong to the same
namespace as the class they belong to
That is, the gtk_drag_* functions cannot be methods as they have a
"GdkDragContext" as the instance parameter, and that is not a valid
type for the Gtk namespace.
This is not an introspected ABI change, as the generated introspection
data ignores the annotation.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi@gnome.org>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=692152
Instead of using `--include-uninstalled` in the scanner arguments, we
can tell Meson to use an introspection target, and it'll do the
appropriate thing for us.
Contrary to what the comments in this function might suggest, it does
not actually do anything about child positions, child child sizes. So,
packing doesn't matter and we don't need to iterate over all child
widgets twice.
And remove the non-NULL checks for minimum_size and natural_size since
these are non-NULL by definition since this function is only called from
measure().
Calling gtk_menu_item_get_label on a GtkSeparatorMenuItem would
otherwise create a GtkLabel child, increasing the vertical size request
to that of the child label.
Remove all the old 2.x and 3.x version annotations.
GTK+ 4 is a new start, and from the perspective of a
GTK+ 4 developer all these APIs have been around since
the beginning.
