Only if they fall outside the grab widget, in that case the widget holding
the implicit grab won't be receiving events anymore, so we can just undo
it.
We now rely on toplevels receiving and forwarding all the events
the windowing should be able to handle. Event masks are no longer a
way to determine whether an event is deliverable ot a widget.
Events will always be delivered in the three captured/target/bubbled
phases, widgets can now just attach GtkEventControllers and let those
handle the events.
Those are now needless and wrong, as we get guarantees that handled
events will contain widget-relative coordinates. A side effect is
that these events are very possibly not explicitly sent to the
GdkWindow that implementations expect, any extra checks performed
through gtk_gesture_set_window() will be wrong, so the function has
been dropped entirely.
And refurbish cursor management to be set on the GtkWidget. The
input window is not needed anymore to receive events either.
This is no longer set through the GdkWindow, so use the private
GtkWidget API.
The event shall no longer be "directed" to the event window, but the
widget. Getting a enter/leave event is enough now to know whether the
pointer is inside or outside the widget.
Unlike GTK+ grabs which are global to all/one device, the implicit grab
is per focus, which means each may have implicit grabs on different or
the same widget.
Now that gtk_main_do_event() is able to handle pointing events in toplevel
coordinates, forward all of these as is. Just minimal handling is still done
on the gdk side for GDK grab accounting, and toplevel tracking for each
pointer.
Implement target finding per-pointer/touchpoint through GtkPointerFocus and
_gtk_toplevel_pick(). Focus changes are handled through the emission of
crossing events between the old target and the new one.
Each toplevel will keep its own tracking of the current ongoing foci,
add the plumbing that will allow to create/update/remove those as they
come and go.
These objects (tied to a toplevel) track the focus of a pointer/touchpoint.
The info in these basically consists of current toplevel coordinates and the
current target widget.
This function will be useful in other places, such as determining the
widgets that must receive crossing events after pointer picking points
to another widget.
Aborting the application makes it look like an application bug, when
it is the expected thing to do when the Wayland display server goes
way. eg., when the user logs out. The log level is also demoted to
avoid a storm of warnings in the log from all applications whenever
this happens.
This is also what the X11 backend does (see gdk_x_io_error).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=783047
The :last-child selector supposed to reset the border was
overridden by the :hover selector. This is fixed by moving the
:last-child selector after the overriding one.
Thanks to Sebastian Keller for spotting.
Fixes https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=779078.
…erties clobbered by commit c92b7d4224.
That and its counterpart were for removing :expand and :fill child props
from GtkBox, but they ended up catching these for GtkToolItemGroup too.
While GtkToolItemGroup still has these, we may as well keep demoing them
Fix the sizing and spacing, blue tags for the bright variant,
similar to what gnome-documents was shipping, and inverted gray
tags for the dark variant, not vanishing on hover.
It was only testing the default configuration, where overlay scrolling
is on and both scrollbars use POLICY_AUTOMATIC. We should also test the
other 3 configurations that are available by including non-overlay
scrollbars and/or those that use POLICY_ALWAYS.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778853
POLICY_AUTOMATIC means scrollbars are only shown when needed, i.e. when
the size of the window is not large enough to show the entire child. So
when measuring the preferred size, such scrollbars should be ignored.
But measure() added size for *any* non-overlay scrollbar of the opposite
orientation, e.g. for horizontal size, it added the width of vscrollbar.
So we requested for child + bar, & having enough for child meant that the
policy hid the bar, leaving extra space empty below/right of the child.
Fix this by only adding size for such bars if they use POLICY_ALWAYS.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778853
• Only calculate the specified dimension – rather than measuring both &
discarding the other (which will often be recalculated right after)
• Only measure a given child scrollbar if it may be visible, not always
• Move variables into narrowest scopes & otherwise improve readability
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778853
