Notifications are not going to be emitted during the finalization, and
GObject will warn if you try to acquire and release a reference to the
notification queue when the reference count of an object has reached
zero.
Fixes: #5420
Recommend that scope implementations should fall
back to or derive from GtkBuilderCScope in order
to not lose GTK's type-guessing machinery.
Related: #5398
Nested async calls are always a challenge.
Hopefully, things are straightened out now,
and we report GTK_DIALOG_ERROR errors for
the cases we care about.
If the parent window of the button gets destroyed
while the dialog is open, we cancel the async op,
but we need to be a little more careful about not
stepping on glass.
If the parent window of the button gets destroyed
while the dialog is open, we cancel the async op,
but we need to be a little more careful about not
stepping on glass.
Determine the location to save testcases in dynamically,
trying first a GTK_SOURCE_DIR environment variable
and then the current directory as the GTK source dir,
ultimatively falling back to just saving in the current
directory.
This avoids leaking details of the build environment
into the produced artifacts and should make GTK builds
more reproducible.
Fixes: #5403
The header in GtkColumnView has multiple event handlers
there is a ::pressed handler in GtkColumnView for
resizing the columns in CAPTURE as well as a motion
and drag controller. The ::release handler is in
GtkColumnViewTitle. We can't claim the event in the
existing handlers because then the ::release handler will
never get called. Currently, however, all clicks get propagated
to the ColumnView from the header which can be problematic.
Since we don't usually want the clicks from the header
handled on the view, claim it in the BUBBLE phase.
Fixes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/issues/5425
Currently, the GdkSurfaceX11 implementation relies that the upper
layers hid the surface before destruction, and that no
GdkSurfaceClass.compute_resize happened between them. If these
circumstances happened, there would be a compute_size timeout left
dangling after the surface got destroyed, poking at incorrect data
later on. Something that looks like this was reported in the
recent mutter-x11-frames "SSD frames server":
mutter-x11-frames:423016): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: 19:41:16.869: invalid unclassed pointer in cast to 'GtkWindow'
Thread 1 "mutter-x11-fram" received signal SIGTRAP, Trace/breakpoint trap.
g_logv (log_domain=0x7ffff7f7c4f8 "GLib-GObject", log_level=G_LOG_LEVEL_WARNING, format=<optimized out>, args=<optimized out>) at ../../../glib/gmessages.c:1433
1433 ../../../glib/gmessages.c: No such file or directory.
(gdb) bt
#0 g_logv (log_domain=0x7ffff7f7c4f8 "GLib-GObject", log_level=G_LOG_LEVEL_WARNING, format=<optimized out>, args=<optimized out>) at ../../../glib/gmessages.c:1433
#1 0x00007ffff73470ff in g_log (log_domain=log_domain@entry=0x7ffff7f7c4f8 "GLib-GObject", log_level=log_level@entry=G_LOG_LEVEL_WARNING, format=format@entry=0x7ffff7f84da8 "invalid unclassed pointer in cast to '%s'")
at ../../../glib/gmessages.c:1471
#2 0x00007ffff7f72892 in g_type_check_instance_cast (type_instance=type_instance@entry=0x5555558e04b0, iface_type=<optimized out>) at ../../../gobject/gtype.c:4144
#3 0x00007ffff791e77d in toplevel_compute_size (toplevel=<optimized out>, size=0x7fffffffe170, widget=0x5555558e04b0) at ../../../gtk/gtkwindow.c:4227
#4 0x00007ffff7f4f3b0 in g_closure_invoke (closure=0x555555898cc0, return_value=return_value@entry=0x0, n_param_values=2, param_values=param_values@entry=0x7fffffffdeb0, invocation_hint=invocation_hint@entry=0x7fffffffde30)
at ../../../gobject/gclosure.c:832
#5 0x00007ffff7f62076 in signal_emit_unlocked_R
(node=node@entry=0x55555588feb0, detail=detail@entry=0, instance=instance@entry=0x55555560e990, emission_return=emission_return@entry=0x0, instance_and_params=instance_and_params@entry=0x7fffffffdeb0)
at ../../../gobject/gsignal.c:3796
#6 0x00007ffff7f68bf5 in g_signal_emit_valist (instance=<optimized out>, signal_id=<optimized out>, detail=<optimized out>, var_args=var_args@entry=0x7fffffffe050) at ../../../gobject/gsignal.c:3549
#7 0x00007ffff7f68dbf in <emit signal ??? on instance 0x55555560e990 [GdkX11Toplevel]> (instance=<optimized out>, signal_id=<optimized out>, detail=detail@entry=0) at ../../../gobject/gsignal.c:3606
#8 0x00007ffff7a8de96 in gdk_toplevel_notify_compute_size (toplevel=<optimized out>, size=size@entry=0x7fffffffe170) at ../../../gdk/gdktoplevel.c:112
#9 0x00007ffff7a4b15a in compute_toplevel_size (surface=surface@entry=0x55555560e990 [GdkX11Toplevel], update_geometry=update_geometry@entry=1, width=width@entry=0x7fffffffe220, height=height@entry=0x7fffffffe224)
at ../../../gdk/x11/gdksurface-x11.c:281
#10 0x00007ffff7a4c3b2 in compute_size_idle (user_data=0x55555560e990) at ../../../gdk/x11/gdksurface-x11.c:356
#11 0x00007ffff733f67f in g_main_dispatch (context=0x55555563f6e0) at ../../../glib/gmain.c:3444
#12 g_main_context_dispatch (context=context@entry=0x55555563f6e0) at ../../../glib/gmain.c:4162
#13 0x00007ffff733fa38 in g_main_context_iterate (context=0x55555563f6e0, block=block@entry=1, dispatch=dispatch@entry=1, self=<optimized out>) at ../../../glib/gmain.c:4238
#14 0x00007ffff733fcef in g_main_loop_run (loop=loop@entry=0x5555560874a0) at ../../../glib/gmain.c:4438
#15 0x0000555555557de0 in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>) at ../src/frames/main.c:68
It perhaps makes sense to warn in these situations, but either way
it sounds like gdk_surface_x11_finalize() could enforce the correct
behavior by ensuring there is no dangling timeouts/data. This commit
does that.
The argument to xdg_activation_token_v1_set_surface is documented to be the
surface requesting the activation, not the surface to be activated, which is
given later when calling xdg_activation_v1_activate.
(c.f. 36cee4bdbc)
Use the same logic as in gdk_wayland_app_launch_context_get_startup_notify_id,
i.e. if we have a surface with focus, set that, otherwise set NULL.
This fixes requesting urgent/focus on wlroots (compositors like Sway, etc.),
which was blocked as the surface requesting the activation didn't have focus.
Signed-off-by: Joan Bruguera <joanbrugueram@gmail.com>
