These widgets have ancestors other than GObject which could eventually
implement the notify vfunc for their properties. For correctness, they
should chain up the notify vfunc.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=673478
While shadow-type *properties* can make sense, to opt-out of the
padding/border machinery programmatically, having it as a style
property doesn't make any sense, since we have a better way to change
the bevel style from the theme already.
This commit deprecates the shadow-type style property in GtkToolbar.
This is a regression from commit
d0d21a4f00.
We are requesting the CSS padding twice: once unconditionally and
another time if SHADOW_TYPE != NONE, which is usually the case.
gtk_widget_path_copy() currently calls g_array_append_val() in a loop,
which is inefficient due to reallocating the array's memory. Calling
g_array_set_size() before entering the loop reduces the number of CPU
cycles used by roughly 30%.
Patch by John Lindgren,
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=679978
Not defining these macros at all causes harsh build breakages.
Better to leave them defined (but documented as deprecated) for now.
Everybody will still get the deprecation warnings for the underlying
gdk_threads_enter/leave.
We can hide the macros again later on when the world has had some
time to port off GDK threads.
The widget is already calling gtk_render_frame, but is not measuring css
border and padding when negotiating its size. This patch replaces the
already existing get_internal_padding static helper with a function that
sums the old internal-padding value with the values specified via css.
Use $(AM_V_GEN) for generating man pages, and set some parameters
for the XSL stylesheets. Among other things, don't generate AUTHORS
and COPYRIGHT sections.
The story is slightly different for applications vs libraries;
make it clear that libraries should continue using the lock so
we don't break applications that haven't been ported to the
'single thread' model yet.
When the tab label gets removed from the notebook on widget
desctruction, we should still unconditionally unparent it from the
notebook, since failing to do so will keep a stray reference alive.
In case applications rely on the tab label being destroyed to release
other references (e.g. because the tab label is a custom object, or
another object's lifecycle is tied to it using g_object_set_data_full()),
this will also possibly cause other references to get leaked.
In Nautilus, the result was we were failing to release the reference to
a NautilusWindowSlot, and other parts of the application relied
on it being destroyed at a specific time instead, causing the
application to crash when closing a window.
This is a regression from commit
325cf071d1.
This commit restores the previous unparenting behavior in case we're not
in a DnD operation.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=680349
We need to do this here so that an explicit gtk_widget_destroy
on either the widget or a container that holds it will kill the
reference to the menu or model.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=680803
This commit deprecates gdk_threads_init, gdk_threads_enter,
gdk_threads_leave and gdk_threads_set_lock_functions. Using GTK+
from multiple threads does not work at all on Windows, and is
problematic on other platforms as well. We want to move to a world
where all GTK+ calls are made from the main thread.
Use g_main_context_invoke, g_idle_add and related functions if you
need to schedule GTK+ calls from other threads.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=680754
These are just wrappers for the functions, and we want to
deprecate them. Stopping to use them internally is a good
first step. Also define GTK_COMPILATION so we can keep using
gdk_threads_enter/leave without causing deprecation warnings.
Remove the "-win32-" from the output file names for the GDK and GTK+ DLLs,
like what is now done for quite a while on other platforms
(and MinGW builds), for consistency reasons. This is due to GDK/GTK+
are buildable with multiple backends.
Note: For references, the Windows build only builds the Win32 backend
for the time being.
