GTK used to not emit GtkWidget::style-updated on widgets that weren't
realized. This sped up construction of complex widgetry in the early
days of GTK3 where we instantly invalidated on every change.
We don't do that anymore, so in theory (and in my limited testing with
widget-factory) this shouldn't be a prolem anymore.
What is a problem though is that postponing style-updated leads to 2
problems:
(1) Unrealized widgets will not emit style-updated which may cause them
to not properly update their state and return wrong values from
get_preferred_width/height() etc
(2) Emitting style-updated during realize can happen too late.
When a widget is not made child-visible by its parent (common
examples: notebook, paned) it will also not be realized when the
parent is initially shown. However, when they get realized later
(after a resize of the parent), they will emit style-updated (and
potentially queue a resize) during size-allocate.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765700
Previously, we had a special cae to draw subwindows of widgets.
This is not necessary as conformant widgets should be able to properly
render themselves when all windows need to be painted.
From now on assume that is the case.
We therefore paint nonnative GDK windows "inline" by just returning TRUE
for gtk_cairo_should_draw_window() for those windows.
This speeds up hilighting different rows in the listbox gtk-demo example
tremendously (by a factor of 10 or more) as the previous code was
O(<number of non-window subwidgets> *
<number of subwindows>) which in the listbox example were ~15,000 and
~2,000 respectively.
There are currently three widget that implement such a property, and
there are other widgets for which the behavior can make sense. It
seems like a good time to add the property to GtkWidget itself so
subclasses can choose to respect it without adding their own property.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757269
This commit toggles the big switch. We now don't run size_allocate()
from the toplevel up anymore in cases where we don't need to.
Things might be broken in subtle ways as a result of this commit. We'll
have to find them and fix them.
... and API to set and unset it.
It is set when gtk_widget_queue_resize() is called.
It is unset when gtk_widget_get_preferred_width/height() is called.
So far it is not used.
Merge it into GtkWidgetPrivate. In my measurements, about half
of all widgets have a non-default auxinfo struct, and we use this
information in size allocation, so it is nice to avoid the gdata
overhead.
We only use widget paths for a few widgets nowadays (notebook,
treeview, pathbar, combobox), so we can save some space by
not having this field in GtkWidgetPrivate.
The hash table is only accessed at creation and destruction time,
and many widgets don't use templates at all, so no need to have
this permanently occupying space.
When recomputing CSS, we need a correct widget path in the fallback mode
where we're still using widget paths.
So we need to invalidate it everytime it actually changes, and not just
when emitting the style-updated signal.
Fixes css-match-regions reftest.
Postpone until the last moment whether the target widget still
potentially uses updates from this sequence, or window dragging
actually applies because all gestures on the target went to denied
state.
This fixes window dragging on empty space in a headerbar that is
contained in a paned (as in e.g. gedit).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=745562
The gesture is hooked to the capture phase, so it works for buttons in
header bars and whatnot. In order to be friendly to the widget it is
capturing events from, an ugly hack is in place to avoid capturing
events when the target widget has a gesture that would consume motion
events.
These functions, while added for use by the GTK inspector, are generally
useful to applications that need to resolve what action groups are
available to a particular GtkWidget.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741386
Currently we only take into account the window GActionGroup for
activating the accels.
However, the application could have some custom GActionGroup in the
chain of focused widgets that could want to activate some action if
some accel is activated while that widget is focused.
To allow applications to set accels on widgets that use custom
GActionGroups, simply use the muxer of the focused widget, which
already contains the actions of the parents.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=740682
Event controllers now auto-attach, and the GtkCapturePhase only determines
when are events dispatched, but all controllers are managed by the widget wrt
grabs.
All callers have been updated.
And handle the fact that drawing bounds are now handled by this API and
the corresponding gtk_widget_get_clip().
Also add _gtk_widget_supports_clip() function to check if a widget has
been ported to the new world.
