And replaces its usages in GtkTextView/GtkStyleContext with a hard-coded
0.04 which was the default value for cursor-aspect-ratio. Also remove
the public gtk_draw_insertion_cursor which used draw_insertion_cursor
which in turn looked up cursor-aspect-ratio
And with it, gtk_widget_get_visual() and gtk_widget_set_visual() are
gone.
We now always use the RGBA visual (if available) and otherwise fall back
to the system visual.
The cursor was set using gdk_window_set_cursor() even in
gdk_window_new().
So instead of having yet another flag, just make the users of that flag
call gdk_window_set_cursor() directly after the window was created.
X11 was the only backend to support it and people can just override it
using XSetClassHint() directly.
The docs already advertised the function as "Do not use".
Keep the existing call to XSetClassHint() in place, so that we keep
setting the same values as in GTK3.
Setting the shadow width earlier as done with commit 4cb1b96 to address
bug 771561 proved to cause unexpected side effects on size_allocate
signal propagation.
As the window is sized correctly earlier, the size_allocate signal is
not emitted again in gtk_widget_size_allocate_with_baseline() which
prevents clutter-gtk from relocating its child widget correctly.
To avoid this issue, revert commit 4cb1b96 but make sure the values
passed as min and max size is never negative in Wayland as this is a
protocol error.
With this, the min/max size will be wrong for a short amount of time,
during the state transition, until the shadow width is updated from
gdk_window_set_shadow_width().
This approach is much safer and less intrusive than changing the
size_allocate logic in gtk.
This reverts commit 4cb1b9645e.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771915
Otherwise, with CSD, we could have a discrepancy where gtk uses the
right values for the shadows whereas the gdk backend still uses the old
values, leading in some cases to invalid or negative min size being
computed (which, in Wayland, leads a protocol error).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771561
The main corpus of the documentation for gtk_window_get_size() is still
full of X11-isms, so we should port it to something that is more
backend-agnostic. Additionally, having some examples would be nice for
application authors looking at a way to appropriately use this function.
Introduce a private API meant for abstracting how to get a handle
of a window that can be shared with other processes. The API is
async, since some implementations will require that. Currently,
only X11 is supported, which doesn't.
Based on a patch by Jonas Adahl.
This matches the behaviour of Mutter, Metacity and traditional X11
window managers on the window manager side, and is what we want
for at least gnome-terminal. I can't think of any reason why we'd
want incremental resize in any other tiled window.
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
Bug: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=760944https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=755947
If we have an application that never goes idle (or takes a long time to
go idle), the close buttons in CSD decoration don't work properly.
While it's not clear why the usage of an idle was added in the first
place, keep on using it to avoid unexpected reentrancy problems, but
change the priority to G_PRIORITY_DEFAULT.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=768485
This partly reverts 9f5b9c0e07, which
removed the check for GtkWidget-window-dragging in the multipress
gesture. This check is still needed for widgets which have this style
property set (e.g. menubars and toolbars) can maximize the window on
double click -- but those widgets which have it set to FALSE shouldn't
maximize the window.
GtkHeadeBar checks the window type hint to determine if the regular
buttons such as menu, maximize or iconify should be visible in the
header bar.
However, an application may very well use a "normal" toplevel window and
set it transient and modal afterwards. In such a case, the iconify
button would remain visible, and the user can hide the window, but being
a modal, the parent window would remain insensitive.
Check for the window type, modality and transient relationship to decide
whether or not the regular toplevel buttons should be visible in the
header bar.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=767052
glade-previewer places a gtkwindow inside another toplevel gtkwindow,
updating the shadow width for the client induces a busy loop where the
parent will grow continuously until it crashes gnome-shell/mutter.
To avoid the loop, do not update the shadow width if not dealing with a
toplevel window.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=761651
Commit cdc580463e made it so that
unresizable windows can't be smaller than a set default size but it
lost the logic to ensure these windows remain at least big enough to
comply with their requisition.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=764174
While this commit was found to make emacs windows shrink (and it was
reverted in the gtk-3-20 branch for that reason), that was the only
observed breakage, while the reversal broke several of our unit tests.
Closer study of the emacs sources revealed that it does some really
unsupportable things like doing its own X event handling behind GTK+'s
back and freely mixing sizes of GtkWindows and GdkWindows obtained in
various ways. I've filed a bug against emacs with suggestions for how
to avoid the shrinking window, regardless of this commit.
Original commit message:
It seems this branch is not needed anymore. It was originally added in
1999 to support gtk_widget_realize(), but all those reasons seem
obsolete today.
Instead just call gtk_widget_realize().
If you end up at this commit when bisecting:
There is no bug that made me remove this code, it was purely meant to be
cleanup / dead code removal. I seem to have introduced a new bug or
bisecting wouldn't have let you here. So it seems we should just revert
this commit.
Some other widget might have mapped and raised another child window of
the toplevel in the meantime, causing the popover window to be covered.
Raise the popover window to avoid the issue.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763627
Some applications set both a default size on their gtk window and a size
request on the corresponding gtk widget.
Until now, the default size was ignored for fixed size windows, so this
had no effect and remained unnoticed, but with the recent change for
client-side decorations, the default size is now used even for fixed size
windows, which can cause the resulting fixed size window to be much
smaller than expected with the size request.
For fixed size windows, if we have both a size request and a default
size set, prefer the size request as before.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763749
commit c3dc0d80f1 fixed the behavior of
GtkContainer widgets requesting an IMMEDIATE resize-mode.
However, GtkWindow has been stomping on resize-mode during realize()
since commit addcc64b9c. The combination
of factors that led to this not being a visible problem during all this
while is uncertain, but this now causes the Shell to continuously try to
relayout its ShellEmbeddedWindow (a GtkWindow subclass).
This commit separates the resize-mode as set internally by GtkWindow
from the one set with the external API, so that GtkWindow only changes
it when it had not been set before by the subclass.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763650
This makes toplevels pseudo-transparent wrt this mimetype, so if
the drag source offers this mimetype and not another that was
managed by the destination-side widget hierarchy, the window will
be an acceptable target for this mimetype, allowing it to trigger
whatever is meant to in the source side.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763387
Under Wayland, popovers use subsurfaces, and we end up getting
configure events for these delivered to the toplevel they're in.
To avoid triggering resize loops, ignore configure events that
are not for the toplevel window itself.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763351
One important aspect of non-resizable windows that we need to preserve
is that they shrink when their content requires less size.
Previous changes to allow the default size to be applied to fixed size
windows would have prevented all fixed size windows from shrinking when
their content requires less size.
Allow shrinking for fixed-size windows unless a default size was
specified.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762974
Previous commit to address the default size introduced a regression
with fixed size windows if no default size was given, the resulting
window would end up much smaller than its actual content.
If a window is not resizable (with gtk_window_set_resizable ()),
the size given with gtk_window_set_default_size() is ignored.
The solution to this would be to use gtk_widget_set_size_request() but
that's a GtkWidget API and therefore does not take into account the
client side decorations when in use with GtkWindow.
Refactor the code so that gtk_window_set_default_size() (which is a
GtkWindow API) gives the expected result on non-resizable windows as
well.
bugzilla: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762974
Will make GTK+ more willing to use CSD for all normal windows without
being asked to. Lack of desktop composition will, of course, prevent
it from using CSD (in theory).
GTK_CSD=0 will force CSD to NOT to be used whenever
possible (i.e. in cases where CSD is not specifically requested
by a window, by design).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=759899
