Conceptually, text handles are boxes, whose content is a 'handle',
so draw background, frame and handle. With this, and the previous
commit, the cursor-handle theming in Adwaita now works as intended.
The text handles reuse the style context from their parent widget,
and just add .cursor-handle. That means that the more specific
entry selectors override the .cursor-handle theming unless we
select for .entry.cursor-handle. We also need to work harder to
keep the .entry styling from drawing decorations around the outlines.
The listbox code relies on the container focus adjustment handling
to scroll the cursor row on screen. But GtkContainer has no idea
about row headers, so ensure that we scroll the header on screen too.
Use gtk_text_iter_set_line_offset (&tmp_iter, 0) instead of
gtk_text_iter_get_line(). The difference should not be big. In the first
case the line doesn't need to be traversed thanks to the offset 0. For
get_line(), the btree must be traversed.
A temporary iter is needed to not break the behavior. But the behavior
is quite strange, the function works directly on the iter passed as an
argument to the function, even if the function returns FALSE (not
found). So maybe a later commit will fix this strange behavior.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=629129
find_by_log_attrs() was a recursive function. It is replaced by an
iteration.
The already_moved_initially parameter was TRUE only for the recursive
call, so the paramater is removed.
There is also a small cleanup of the find_visible_by_log_attrs()
(remove trailing spaces, fix indentation).
There is still a part to optimize for a later commit.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=629129
This is fallout from the recent dialog changes. We don't set the
headerbar as titlebar early enough anymore, so when the window title
gets set, it does not get passed on to the headerbar. So, re-set it
manually when the titlebar is put in place.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733099
This will let us theme activatable rows differently.
We also avoid emitting the ::row-activated signal for
rows that are not activatable. For compatibility reasons,
rows are activatable by default.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733112
Move the touchscreen switch to the other debug switches, and
move the hidpi spin to the other graphical controls. Since the
Visual tab is getting large, make it scroll. The General tab
is purely informational again.
Otherwise, the CSS background we draw would be clipped if the ink rect
was smaller than the allocation (a very common thing).
Broken since 37030a7710 where we clipped
to the ink rect.
The overlap was caused by using pack-end for the arrow, which
causes it to be allocated from the other end. Avoid the problem
by using pack-start for both the title and the arrow, and
reordering them according to xalign.
Some of the features we expose can be hardcoded via environment
variables. In that case, don't confuse the user by letting them
change settings that have no effect.
The displacement animation has been replaced by edge gradients, that
have a stronger color the harder overshooting is hit. This makes it
possible to remove the internal overshoot window, which was merely
used to have contents displaced when overshooting to top/left.
Overshooting to bottom/right used to cause queue_resize() to be
called on the scrolled window, this isn't necessary anymore either.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731297
There was this hack, taken verbatim from GtkCList according to the comment,
that would recursively translate the allocation during scrolling, and set
it on children widgets through the direct gtk_widget_set_allocation() setter.
Since commit 4f89eb05cf, this has caused the wrong clipping areas to children
widgets of a textview. The reasons for this seem lost in time, and the approach
seems indeed wrong for windowed widgets as the repositioning of those windows
couldn't happen.
So replace all of this with just a gtk_widget_size_allocate() call, which does
work ok for the children widgets embedded in the "multiple views" gtk demo, and
ought to work for every other widget.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732900
The reparenting happening on the column header so it gets a movable
window breaks the implicit grab, so this is one situation were we
want a pointer grab, if just to replace it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732933
Code was expecting view coordinates, not widget ones, as we're
only dealing with horizontal displacements, just adding the
horizontal adjustment value suffices.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732933
This saves some code and lets us reuse the color swatch styling.
Among other things, this fixes a lack of discernible border when
the selected color is very similar to the background.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=680885
The recent reshuffling caused an ordering problem where we would
hide the action area before relocating the buttons to the header
bar. But hiding makes the default button loose its defaultness.
Rearrange things so that we move the buttons before hiding the
action area, and thus preserve the default.
If the drag gesture gets a GtkGesture::updated signal, the user
is directly interacting through pointer/touch with the range slider,
animating the adjustment value change in this situation can produce
perceived lag, so set the value immediately when this is happening.
Use the adjustment target value when repositioning the cursor, and remove the
checks that ensured the cursor was made onscreen immediately, as there will
be definitely a delay on animated adjustment changes.
When moving the cursor, compare current adjustment value with the post-animation
target value, in order to avoid false "keynav failed" positives as the animation
hasn't started yet, so dx/dy are still 0 at that time.
Use the new ::resource-base-path property on #GApplication to attempt to
load the menu layout of the application.
We look first at gtk/menus-appmenu.ui or gtk/menus-traditional.ui
depending on the setting of gtk_application_prefers_app_menu(). Failing
that, we fall back to the common case of gtk/menus.ui (which should
always be given). This provides a convenient way for application
authors to provide a different set of menus, depending on the desktop
environment they find themselves in.
As is the intention with other resources, if the resource base path is
unset, nothing will be loaded. Additionally, if the expected files are not
found, it is not an error -- just nothing happens.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=722092
For the transition to work the box-shadows types in the shadow list
needs to be matched in various states so I'm using transparent shadows
istead of resetting them when not needed.
Keep Ctrol-Shift-D as a straight toggle-the-inspector keybinding,
but make Ctrl-Shift-I always bring up the inspector, and point
it at the widget under the pointer.
The way that GtkTextView et al pop up their context menu is to first
query to see if the clipboard has some text, and if so, enable the Paste
menu item. But since the Wayland backend hasn't had the greatest
selection and clipboard code, the callback for the clipboard got dropped
on the floor.
Add some simple code to respond to the TARGETS selection.
This makes right-clicking on a GtkTextView work fine.
Resize grips were introduced for GNOME 3.0, before we had any of the
"new GNOME app" features like invisible borders and CSD. With OS X 10.6
and 10.7, Apple has replaced the classic grips in their applications
with invisible borders as well.
New GNOME app designs don't use resize grips anymore and the new
default theme for GTK+, Adwaita, disables them entirely by forcing their
width and height to 0.
They're past their time. Remove the code to support them. This can
always be reverted if some app relies on them.
We decided in f8412eca34 that
we still need to react to these for a11y reasons, but left
the (then) harmless property deprecation in place. Now, the
deprecation causes runtime warnings for merely reading the
property, so drop it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732667
.scrollbars-junction borders were removed by setting border-stylei: none,
it interacted (why?) with the scrollbars on sidebar, making the border
transparent seems not to have side effects there.
When showing and hiding the inspector window repeatedly without
dismissing the dialog, we were hiding the inspector, but not
the dialog, leading to a confusing user experience.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732443
Applications can call this to determine if they should an app menu.
This will be %FALSE on desktop environments that do not have an
application menu like the one in gnome-shell. It is %FALSE on Windows
and Mac OS.
Applications are completely free to totally ignore this API -- it is
only provided as a hint to help applications that may be interested in
supporting non-GNOME platforms with a more native 'look and feel'.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=722092
We were only setting the state transiently in ::draw, leading
to various drawing anomalies, such as labels not picking up
the appropriate color from BUTTON styles.
This is expected to happen on wayland and other platforms with no primary selection,
and just leads to the selected text being cleared after any attempt to change the
text selection itself through either mouse/keyboard.
This is expected to happen on wayland and other platforms with no primary selection,
and just leads to the selected text being cleared after any attempt to change the
text selection itself through either mouse/keyboard.
When there area explicitly added buttons in the action area,
we were trying to ensure that the action area is visible,
but failed, since we are now hiding the action_box. Fix it
by showing the action_box when things are left in the action
area.
We don't set use-header-bar for message dialogs, since we
want the buttons in the action area, but we do want a nice
rounded csd titlebar. Add back the box that was used before
to achieve this, when appropriate.
Give GtkAboutDialog buttons in the action area instead of hard-coding
use-header-bar to TRUE. This is for environments which don't have the
Gtk/DialogsUseHeader xsetting turned on.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=730893
We use gtk_adjustment_enable_animation to enable animated
updates of the adjustments. Currently, this is enabled
unconditionally, and with a duration that is hardcoded.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732376
Add a private API that lets widget opt-in to animated updates of
the adjustment value. When enabled, all calls to
gtk_adjustment_set_value will smoothly transition from the old
value to the new value, using a fixed easing function and a
configurable duration. The animation is tied to the frame clock
of the widget.
By implementing this in GtkAdjustment, we can enable animation
for both scrollbars and keybindings, which are often implemented
in the child widget of the scrolled window.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732376
This makes it possible to look up icons in resources using
the icon theme api, and should be used as a replacement
for installing icons below $pkgdatadir/icons and adding
that location to the search path.
Make icon lookup from resources work without the extra hicolor
component in the path. It is redundant, since we always treat
builtin icons as part of hicolor anyway.
Grabbing on a non-toplevel might not do what we want it to do, since it
will go on the focused widget, not the grabbed widget. Since we don't
focus the widget before clicking on it, that means that putting the
focus somewhere else and then clicking on the accelerator editor will
freeze the app. Additionally, since it's a global system grab that can't
be exited except by a key press that we won't ever get, it effectively
locks up your system as well unless you know how to break the grab or
kill the app. Ouch.
Since doing a device grab on a non-toplevel is generally considered a
bad idea, just don't do it. Use a GtkInvisible and take a grab on that
instead.
When validating the style context, we are copying the animations
from one StyleValues instance to another, and cancel the old ones.
It turns out that sometimes the old and the new StyleValues are
the same, and in this case, we end up cancelling the animations
for good.
One case where breakage from this was observed is that the spinners
in gtk3-widget-factory stop spinning when you open and close a modal
dialog on page 2. This depends a bit on the window manager; the problem
can only be seen if opening the dialog causes a transition to backdrop.
This changes the calculation of activity mode progress in the
same way as was done in GtkProgressBar a while ago, and make it
smooth, using a tick callback.
We want to stop people from using configure events
entirely. GtkDrawingArea synthesizes a configure event, but we can just
make the only user of this functionality stop it, and correct the
documentation to not mention it.
