This adds a "release" destructor for the gtk_surface1 interface which
signals to the server that a surface has been destroyed on the client
side, which the current "destroy" does not do.
Ideally the protocol would have specified a destroy request marked as
destructor to handle this automatically, however this is no longer
possible due to the destroy method being implicitly generated in the
absence of an explicit request in the protocol. Adding a destroy request
marked as destructor now would generate a new destroy method that
unconditionally would send the request to the server, which would break
clients running on servers not supporting that request.
Commit e6209de962 added some checks on TranslationEntry.valid in
order to figure out whether using the new font settings or the
old g-s-d ones. However that's only set in the non-sandboxed case.
This makes sandboxed applications fallback to the old (and also
non-existing with modern g-s-d) settings, possibly resulting in
ugly defaults being picked.
Fix this by also marking TranslationEntry elements as valid when
using the settings portal, precisely those entries that we are able
to read and match with our own table.
When destroying a wl_surface (e.g. when a window or menu is closed), the
surface may continue to exist in the compositor slightly longer than on
the client side. In that case, the surface can still receive input
events, which need to be ignored gracefully.
In particular, this prevents segfaulting on wl_surface_get_user_data()
in that situation.
Reported in
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/issues/3296
The same issue for pointers/keyboards was reported in
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693338
and fixed with in
bfd7137ffb3625f17857a8fc099a72
In pointer_surface_update_scale(), only rescale the cursor surface when
the scale has actually changed and the cursor is on at least one output.
fixes https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/issues/3350
Right now, this issue is not completely understood, so it might also
involve some questionable handling of cursor surface by sway/wlroots.
However, irrespective of that issue, this patch avoids unnecessary calls to the
compositor, and there should be no drawback: Whenever the pointer enters
a new output, pointer_surface_update_scale() will be called again, such
that correct scaling of the cursor is still ensured.
There is a slight difference: When the cursor leaves the last output,
previously the image was reset to scale factor 1. Now, it keeps whatever
was last. That might be more sensible than the previous behaviour,
assuming that it's likely that when the cursor enter an output again, it
has the same scaling. Alternatively, if one cares about resource usage
at this level, it might make more sense to destroy the surface than
rescaling to 1.
Some GTK based applications such as Qemu UI create and manage
EGLSurfaces associated with the relevant GdkSurfaces. In order to create
an EGLSurface, there needs to be a way to pass the native window
object to eglCreateWindowSurface(). While running in an X environment,
the native window object can be obtained by calling
gdk_x11_surface_get_xid(). Likewise, the native window object can be
obtained by calling gdk_wayland_surface_get_wl_egl_window() while
running in a Wayland environment. Therefore, this API needs to be
exposed to apps.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy@intel.com>
When being fullscreen, and wanting to unfullscreen but not caring about
whether to go unmaximized or maximized (as this information is lost), if
the GdkToplevelLayout represents the full intended state, we won't be
able to do the right thing.
To avoid this issue, make the GdkToplevelLayout API intend based, where
if one e.g. doesn't call gdk_toplevel_set_maximized() with anything, the
backend will not attempt to change the maximized state.
This means we can also remove the old 'initially_maximized' and
'initially_fullscreen' fields from the private GtkWindow struct, as we
only deal with intents now.
It was used by all surfaces to track 'is-mapped', but still part of the
GdkToplevelState, and is now replaced with a separate boolean in the
GdkSurface structure.
It also caused issues when a widget was unmapped, and due to that
unmapped a popover which hid its corresponding surface. When this
surface was hidden, it emitted a state change event, which would then go
back into GTK and queue a resize on popover widget, which would travel
back down to the widget that was originally unmapped, causing confusino
when doing future allocations.
To summarize, one should not hide widgets during allocation, and to
avoid this, make this new is-mapped boolean asynchronous when hiding a
surface, meaning the notification event for the changed mapped state
will be emitted in an idle callback. This avoids the above described
reentry issue.
We only called xdg_toplevel.(un)set_maximize() if the toplevel layout
changed, but this misses the case when the compositor had changed the
maximized state. Change it to call the xdg_toplevel request if either
the local layout changed, or if the layout differs from the current
state.
This fixes an issue where one couldn't unmaximize a window by double
clicking the titlebar that, had previously been maximized e.g. using a
keyboard binding.
Do the same for fullscreen.
If compute_size() returns TRUE, the layout will not be propagated to
GTK. This will be used by the X11 backend to queue asynchronous resizes
that shouldn't yet allocate in GTK.
Not doing this means the next time the same surface is shown, if the
shadow size wasn't changed, it wouldn't be sent to the compositor, which
then would result in compositor deriving its own window geometry which
would include the shadow margin.
This fixes an issue where the file chooser dialog would grow each time
it opened.
This removes the gdk_surface_set_shadow_width() function and related
vfuncs. The point here is that the shadow width and surface size can now
be communicated to GDK atomically, meaning it's possible to avoid
intermediate stages where the surface size includes the shadow, but
without the shadow width set, or the other way around.
GTK4 doesn't support arbitrary constraints when resizing a window (e.g.
steps, or aspect ratio), so we don't need to care about the result from
compute-size when doing interactive resizing.
By moving popup layout emission to the layout phase, the current
GdkPopup::poup-layout-changed signal has no value on its own as it'd be
ignored by GtkPopover.
Make the Wayland backend communicate the popup layout changes via the
common signal; but leave the rest intact until other backends catch up.
Put them in a anonymous struct, and separate the toplevel specific ones
into another anonymous struct inside the first one. Later popup related
fields will be added.
GdkSurface's are initialized to have the size 1x1, as otherwise we'd
receive an X11 error, would a corresponding X11 window be created.
This confuses the "saved size" mechanisms in the Wayland backend, as
treats 0 as uninitialized, and not 1.
Fix this simply not saving size that if it's smaller or equal than 1.
Concentrate state application to the start of a frame; this is to avoid
having GTK going back and forth between different state if so would
happen between two frames.
Queue it, and then wait for it to actually take effect, i.e. be
confirmed via a configure event from the compositor, before setting the
actual GdkSurface::state value.
The plan is to concencrate size computations as part of the frame clock
dispatch, meaning we shouldn't do it synchronously in the present()
function.
Still, in Wayland, and maybe elsewhere, it is done in the present()
function, e.g. when no state change was made, but this will eventually
be changed.
Mapping a surface under Wayland is an asynchronous process, where one
creates a surface and commits an initial state without having drawn
anything, then waiting for a configuration, which then is acknowledged
and content is painted and committed. Not until having received this
configuration is a surface actually mapped, so wait with setting the
mappedness until this.
Use the set_minimized method of the xdg_toplevel
interface to implement minimization as well as possible.
It is not possible, since there is no corresponding
state that we could use to update our surface state,
but in practice, it works well enough.
Fixes: #2688
This commit fix the warning:
../gdk/wayland/gdkdisplay-wayland.c:1079: Warning: GdkWayland: gdk_wayland_display_set_cursor_theme: unknown parameter 'name' in documentation comment, should be 'theme'
