We need to rename the projects so that when these projects are added
into an all-in-one solution file that will build the GTK+ 2/3 stack,
the names of the projects will not collide with the GTK+-2.x ones,
especially as GTK+-2.x and GTK+-3.x are done to co-exist on the same
system. This is due to the case that the MSVC projects are directly
carried over from the GTK+-2.x ones and was then updated for 3.x.
We still need to update the GUIDs of the projects, so that they won't
conflict with the GTK+-2.x ones.
Use the common automake module from the previous commit in the
Makefile.am's, which means that the Makefile.am's in gdk/ and gtk/ can be
cleaned up as a result. As a side effect, the property sheet that is used
to "install" the build results and headers can now be generated in terms of
the listing of headers to copy during 'make dist', where we can acquire
most of the list of headers to "install", so that we can largely avoid the
situation where the property sheet files are not updated in time for this,
causing missing headers when this build of GTK+ is being used.
Also use the Visual Studio Project file generation for the following
projects:
gtk3-demo
gtk3-demo-application
gtk3-icon-browser
gdk-win32
gdk-broadway
gail-util
So that the maintenace of these project files can be simplified as well.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=681965
This adds a common autotools module that can be used by various projects to
generate the Visual Studio projects as needed, and if necessary, generate
the headers listings to "install" for that project, based on items passed
in to this. This is modeled on the Makefile.introspection autotools file
that is used by many GNOME projects to generate the introspection files.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=681965
Initially the subsurface will be in synchronized mode and we will leave
it like this until the first time the parent surface has been committed.
The reason for this is because the subsurface position will be applied
as part of the parent surface state, and we need to synchronize the
initial position with the initial frame, so that we don't accidentally
draw the subsurface at the default position (0, 0) which would happen in
desynchronized mode if the subsurface content is committed before the
next parent surface commit.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=754839
The GtkEventController event mask is private, and set early by GtkGesture
implementations. Being this private data, there is no corresponding
property, so this code is a no-op, there is just no need to listen to
changes there.
We use to rely on grab broken events for most of the event sequence
lifetime, this breaks though on GDK_BUTTON_RELEASE/GDK_TOUCH_END, as there's
no longer a grab at that time.
For these cases (and all others where there's destroy/unrealize calls
involved during event dispatching), catch this on the late
WIDGET_REALIZED_FOR_EVENT calls on widget event handling functions.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=754098
This avoids a lot of overhead in the common case where a signal
is not connected and we're just using the class vfunc (which is true
for all in-libgtk widgets). Additionally it makes backtraces in
debuggers and profiles much much nicer to look at.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=754986
These days exposure happens only on the native windows (generally the
toplevel window) and is propagated down recursively. The expose event
is only useful for backwards compat, and in fact, for double buffered
widgets we totally ignore the event (and non-double buffering breaks
on wayland).
So, by not setting the mask we avoid emitting these events and then
later ignoring them.
We still keep it on eventbox, fixed and layout as these are used
in weird ways that want backwards compat.
There is no need to ref the windows we're ignoring, so collect and ref
only the affected child windows. Also, use a on-stack array rather
than allocating a linked list.
Also, we don't need to ref during the event emissions too, as we
already hold a ref.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=754687
It turns out that xgettext does not understand translatable="1",
so don't make gtk-builder-tool produce this, even though
GtkBuilder can parse it just fine.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=754928
This changes textview to share the style context with the pixelcache.
Doing so allows pixel cache to optimize the surface creation and use
a CAIRO_CONTENT_COLOR instead of CAIRO_CONTENT_COLOR_ALPHA when
appropriate.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=754658
We can take a fast path if the background for a widget is opaque by using
a CAIRO_CONTENT_COLOR instead of a CAIRO_CONTENT_COLOR_ALPHA surface. Most
blit'ing backends have a fast path for this, including Pixman and Quartz.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=754658
This new private API, _gtk_style_context_is_background_opaque(), is meant to
be used by internal Gtk+ wigets to optimize fast paths for cases where
applicable. One such use would be to use a CAIRO_CONTENT_COLOR surface
instead of CAIRO_CONTENT_COLOR_ALPHA.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=754658
This avoids a bunch of allocations, and additionally it has better
cache behaviour, as we don't follow pointers to the separate GList
node memory areas during traversal.
From Christian Hergert:
This machine is a Retina mac book pro so I've been working on getting
GtkTextView (GtkPixelCache) up to our performance level on
X11/Wayland. I'm seeing a jump from about 43 FPS to about 50 FPS.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=754687
Merge it into GtkWidgetPrivate. In my measurements, about half
of all widgets have a non-default auxinfo struct, and we use this
information in size allocation, so it is nice to avoid the gdata
overhead.
