The popovers may return keyboard grabs to previous widgets, so if
called after unsetting the focus, the window may be left with a
dangling GtkWidget that would cause crash at later dispose() calls.
Popovers are strange in the sense that they aren't attached to a
parent directly, they rely on the relative_to widget so the toplevel
is shared, and when they have a parent, it is the toplevel itself,
not relative_to. This also means that there are conditions where the
popover loses it's parent, so they must survive unparenting.
The previous code would be floating the last reference as soon as the
parent is gone, but it was non-obvious who'd own that reference. So
fix this situation by granting the ownership of popovers to their
relative_to widget, an extra reference may be held by the toplevel
when the popover has a parent, but the popover object will be
guaranteed to be alive as long as the parent lives.
This way, memory management of popovers is as hidden from the user
as regular widgets within containers are, users are free to call
gtk_widget_destroy() on a popover, but it'd eventually become
destructed when relative_to is.
This makes it possible to move/resize client-side decorated windows that are
otherwise obscured by a GTK+ grab somewhere else, either a popover within the
window itself or a modal dialog above the window.
Popovers are transient floating widgets that are confined to the
window space. These have their own GdkWindow that is set on top
of the regular window contents, so they can be used for popup menu
alike UIs with custom popup/popdown/grabs behavior.
With proper notifications, plus an accessor method for that state. This
allows client to just listen to notify::is-maximized instead of tracking
window-state-event.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=698786
This leads to disastruous results, since each menu is itself
in a GtkWindow, so holding down the menu key leads to a neverending
cascade of menus on top of menus.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=722106
The window-dragging code had a number of issues: The code was
starting a drag on every button press, never bothering to cancel
them. This leads to the odd hand cursor occurring between the two
clicks to maximize. We relied on GDK's multi-click detection, which
gives us triple-clicks when we really want sequences of double-clicks.
Lastly, we didn't propery restrict double-click handling to the primary
button, so e.g. if you had a window on an empty workspace, double-right
click on the titlebar would maximize it, which is not intended.
This commit solves all three problem by a doing our own double-click
detection, and only starting a drag when the pointer goes out of
'double-click range'. We change the way dragging is implemented for
menubars and toolbars to just letting events bubble up, so they
get the same behaviour as the titlebar. To make this work, we
have to select for pointer motion events in a few more places.
gtkapplication.c has turned into a bit of an #ifdef mess over time, and
many of the current checks are incorrect. As an example, if you build
Gtk for wayland, and exclude the X11 backend, much of the functionality
required by wayland (such as exporting menu models) will be disabled.
Solve that by introducing a backend mechanism to GtkApplication (named
GtkApplicationImpl) similar to the one in GApplication. Add backends
for Wayland, X11 and Quartz, with X11 and Wayland sharing a common
'DBus' superclass.
GtkApplicationImpl
|
/--------------+-------------------\
| |
GtkApplicationImplDBus GtkApplicationImplQuartz
|
/-----------+-----------------\
| |
GtkApplicationImplX11 GtkApplicationImplWayland
GtkApplicationImpl itself is essentially a bunch of vfuncs that serve as
hooks for various things that the platform-specific backends may be
interested in doing (startup, shutdown, managing windows, inhibit, etc.)
With this change, all platform specific code has been removed from
gtkapplication.c and gtkapplicationwindow.c (both of which are now free
of #ifdefs, except for a UNIX-specific use of GDesktopAppInfo in
gtkapplicationwindow.c).
Additionally, because of the movement of the property-setting code out
of GtkApplicationWindow, the _GTK_APPLICATION_ID properties (and
friends) will be set on non-GtkApplicationWindows, such as dialogs.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720550
We don't want the maximum size to be smaller than the minimum size. Not
just because it's wrong but also because when this happens the rest of
GTK gets mighty confused and infloops resizing to min-size and
max-size in turns causing a flickering window. Well, at least if you
run X without a window manager. Or your window manager hasn't finished
starting up.
Private RHEL bug finding this issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035409
Both GtkApplicationWindow and GtkHeaderBar listen for changes
of the gtk-shell-shows-app-menu setting, so they need to somehow
coordinate who is going to take action and show a fallback.
We prefer the menu button in the title over the menubar, so
let GtkApplicationWindow opt out if it finds that the header bar
has been configured to show window controls.
And deprecate the X11-specific version of it.
We call this new API _set_shadow_width() and not _set_frame_extents()
because we already have a gdk_window_get_frame_extents() with a
different meaning and different type of value.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720374
When setting a custom titlebar that happens to be a GtkHeaderBar,
we connect to notify::title to pick up title changes on the headerbar,
but we forgot to sync the title initially. Fix that.
Win32 does not have alpha channel currently ; fix the check
for this, so trying to enable CSDs on this platform will
not "succeed" and crash the app anymore.
Partially fixes gtk3-widget-factory.
Instead, use the monitor's work area.
This might have unforseen side effects that warrant a later revert, such
as:
- Apparently some WMs assume maximizing when a window is maximum screen
size.
- WMs might not shrink the window by the decorations' size when it tries
to be fullscreen.
- Applications might have buggy size request code that causes weirdly
sized windows.
Do the menubutton for app menu fallback ourselves in GtkWindow
for the csd, non-custom titlebar case. This fits better with
the way we handle other title buttons. Themes have control
over the placement of this button by placing menu in the
decoration-button-layout style property.
Rework how accels are handled on GtkApplicationWindow.
Instead of having GtkApplication fill the GtkAccelMap which is then used
by GtkApplicationWindow to create a GtkAccelGroup filled with closures
that is then associated with the window, do it directly.
GtkApplication now keeps a list of accels and their actions.
Accelerators on a GtkApplicationWindow ask GtkApplication to execute the
appropriate action.
This saves a fair bit of complexity and memory use (due to not having to
create all those closures and accelmap entries). The new approach also
supports multiple accels per action (although there is not yet a public
API for it).
This patch (and the ones before) Reviewed and ACK'd by Matthias Clasen.
Previously, GtkWindow would add the "app" action group to its own
toplevel muxer.
Change the setup so that GtkApplication creates the toplevel muxer and
adds itself to it as "app". Use this muxer as the parent muxer of any
GtkWindow associated with the application.
This saves a small amount of memory and will allow for accels to be
propagated from the application through to all of the windows.
Resize modes don't work anymore, both because nobody ever uses them and
because the frame clock changed the way things work quite a bit. So we
don't want to advertise them as a good idea.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=708787
Previously, we were showing and hiding the custom titlebar
widget in response to state changes such as maximization.
Instead, use gtk_widget_set_child_visible() and leave
show/hide to applications. This makes it possible to set
a custom titlebar and hide it, for a titlebar-less appearance.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=707132
The size of the shadow and invisible borders can (and usually
will) change between backdrop and focused windows, while the
overall window size remains unchanged. This causes the visible
window to visually 'jump'. We can avoid this by always reserving
the maximum of the focused and unfocused border sizes. The code
for positioning the input-only windows making up the invisible
border is adjusted to deal with this. We now always place the
invisible border right outside the visible content, even if the
shadow extends out much farther.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=707524
We need to subtract border_width from the size we're passing to the
children hfw functions as those are added by ourselves.
Fixes the window-border-width.ui reftest.
At least for header bars, there's often application controls
in this area, which should be included in the focus chain.
We make it so that the initial focus avoids the titlebar,
but tabbing around will eventually get there.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=708067
There were some code added to this file that is meant for the X11 backend,
but they are being unconditionally built. Add build-time checks for the
X11 backend for these to fix the build on non-X11 platforms.
We'll use a style class to be able to give this a different appearance,
but for the time being we don't really need to give this such different
margin.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=706592
"title_box" is used for both a custom header bar and for a titlebar.
Since we want to help differentiate these cases in the code, rename
everything titlebar-internal to use "titlebar_".
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=706529
Attached widgets inherit from the style of the widget they are
attached to. This can sometimes have unintended consequences,
like a context menu in the main view of gedit inheriting the font
that is configured for documents, or the context menu of the preview
in the font chooser coming up with humongous font size.
To fix this problem, we introduce a context menu style class
and use it for all menus that are used like that. The theme
can then set a font for this style class.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=697127
Make sure we always deal with the same screen when
connecting / disconnecting the theme-variant changed handler.
Pointed out by Morten Welinder in
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705640
We've recently a number of classes wholly. For these cases,
move the headers and sources to gtk/deprecated/ and adjust
Makefiles and includes accordingly.
Affected classes:
GtkAction
GtkActionGroup
GtkActivatable
GtkIconFactory
GtkImageMenuItem
GtkRadioAction
GtkRecentAction
GtkStock
GtkToggleAction
GtkUIManager
Other code assumes that the widget has a window if it is realized.
Since we might trigger such code indirectly from gtk_window_realize,
don't mark the window as realized before we've registered its window.
Group the buttons on each side in a box, and give them different
style classes, so themes can differentiate (this is partially a
workaround for limitations in our css selectors). The boxes also
let us add a margin below the buttons, without affecting the
allocation of the buttons themselves.
gtk_widget_get_allocated_height returns the adjusted
allocation, so we can't use it as measure for how much
room to leave when drawing the window background.
Bring back need_default_size. We need it to preserve this
documented behavior:
The default size of a window only affects the first time a window is
shown; if a window is hidden and re-shown, it will remember the size
it had prior to hiding, rather than using the default size.
With this patch, all of the window sizing tests in
gtk/tests/window pass again.
This avoids an evil trap when doing MAX (..., ... - 2 * border_width)
and the expression on the right gets promoted to unsigned, instead
of going negative as you would expect.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=699633
Instead of having three different boxes and style classes, we can just
get away with the regular background box, plus a window-frame, which
contains the external frame, together with the window drop shadows.
GtkWindow now has special code to ensure the backing actual window is
allocated big enough to accomodate the shadows (using the shadow size
calculations introduced in the previous commit). We also use the margin
value to determine the size of the invisible borders (which can then be
different than the shadow).
We still need to respect this border value even when we're not running
under CSD, since we support setting a custom titlebar in all cases.
The border/style magic in gtk_window_draw() really needs to be separated
out into logical pieces soon, but for now let's keep a consistent
behavior with the previous code.
Instead of reparenting the content, use input-only windows to
set cursors and capture clicks on the window frame. This avoids
some of the problems that were introduced by content_window, such
as black flashes and non-working opacity.
Don't just look at previously remembered sizes, also look at the current
size.
This is useful for cases where the window was resized by the user or WM
and not by the application itself.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=696882
We don't want to remember sizes in the not resizable case. Also a
function named "guess_default_size" should not look at previous sizes,
it should guess.
Old code assumed the size was stored in widget.allocation. This is no
longer true as the allocation is cleared upon hide. However, we store
the last configure request, and that one tracks the last size, so we can
just use that number.
Sometimes things are so easy - once you figure them out...
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=696882
When the window has no mnemonics modifier set, as in the case of a
GtkMenu, never schedule a display of mnemonics on focus-in.
Previously, for those windows, the GdkModifierType mask fetched from the
device would typically have been zero, leading to the
mnemonic_modifier == (mask & gtk_accelerator_get_default_mod_mask ())
check to succeed, so we would always trigger a display for popup menus.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=697144
Don't mention "auto mnemonics", since those methods are purely about
scheduling a delayed display, and that makes understanding the code a
bit harder.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=697144
First of all, that call is deprecated. Second, we don't have RC styles
anymore. Third, what that function does today is invalidate style
contexts, but that happens automatically when setting the screen on the
style context later.
So this function is completely unnecessary.
This make the nice 'snap off' feature of gnome-shell work
with client-side decorations. weston moves the maximized window
around, which is less ideal...
We already set it in init, so this is just redundant.
The additional window-content style class here is needed so that we can
distinguish between the full X window background and the background for
the actual window contents.
We were not translating event coordinates to the toplevel
window, thus the regions we determined were not right.
We were also not respecting the maximized state, and we
were unnecessarily refusing to handle events when not decorated.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=696197
The function update_window_buttons shows or hides the title header after it
has finished updating the visibility of the various buttons. Unfortunately
this
conflicted with the hiding of the title done when going fullscreen.
This solves the problem and fixes the rendering of fullscreen applications by
using update_window_buttons to control the visibility of the box in the
fullscreen case.
A new function that sets a custom titlebar on a GtkWindow.
With client-side decorations, the custom titlebar simply
replaces the one that GtkWindow would otherwise create itself.
With traditional decorations, we tell the window manager
to just decorate the window with a border. This works ok
at least with metacity and mutter.
For csd, we were subtracting the border width one too many
times from the child height, causing clipped off content e.g.
in the 'Properties' window in testgtk.
For now, nothing changes, we're using the sum of inner and
outer border everywhere.
In the future, we will make the inner border the visible
window frame, and the outer border the shadow/resize border.
Add a style property to control the presence and order of
window buttons. We allow buttons at the left and right side,
they can be specified like this: icon,close:minimize,maximize.
Also, change the default button layout back to have just a close
button on the right, use icons in buttons, and set style classes
on the buttons, to allow better theming.
Hide the close button if the window is not deletable, hide the
maximize button if the window is not resizable, and hide all
buttons if the window is a dialog.
Update buttons when the window state changes.
Client side decorations can be enabled on non-Wayland platforms by
setting the GTK_CSD="1" environment variable.
We must ensure we have a GdkVisual that has an alpha channel since
the decorations rely on transparency. If we cannot get a visual with
an alpha channel then we do not enable client side decorations.
Otherwise we'll potentially get some background sticking through our rounded
corners in our decorations. The actual background will get drawn as part of
the decoration drawing.
This change comprises four main parts:
* the creation of the widgets that form the decorations,
* implementation of get_preferred_height/width, and the for_width/for_height
variants,
* taking the decorations into account when allocating,
* and drawing the decorations themselves.
Kristian did the bulk of the original work on this but any bugs are almost
certainly mine through the many refactorings and rebasings.
Update the documentation and users of this function to handle
the future case that that we have some internal decorations to the window and
useable allocation is thus smaller.
By having a separate out parameter there is no need to have an in/out function
and allows for greater robustness.
The current implementation simply returns the allocation provided.
The callback function gtk_window_on_theme_variant_changed is only used on the
X11 backend (where GtkSettings is used for the settings information.)
Fixes: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=674207
Deprecate gdk_window_enable_synchronized_configure() and
gdk_window_configure_done() and make them no-ops. Implement the
handling of _NET_WM_SYNC_REQUEST in terms of the frame cycle -
we know that all processing will be finished in the next frame
cycle after the ConfigureNotify is received.
This adds gtk_widget_get/set_opacity, as well as a GtkWidget.opacity
property. Additionally it deprectates gtk_window_get/set_opacity and
removes the GtkWindow.opacity property (in preference for the new
identical inherited property from GtkWidget, which should be ABI/API
compat).
The implementation is using the new gdk_window_set_opacity child
window support for windowed widgets, and cairo_push/pop_group()
bracketing in gtk_widget_draw() for non-window widgets.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687842
This replaces the previously hardcoded calls to gdk_window_set_user_data,
and also lets us track which windows are a part of a widget. Old code
should continue working as is, but new features that require the
windows may not work perfectly.
We need this for the transparent widget support to work, as we need
to specially mark the windows of child widgets.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687842
The window size can be queried on widget->window directly, no need to
store it in widget->allocation.
This change is necessary because gtk_widget_set_allcation() is now
checking invariants that assume it's called from insize
gtk_widget_size_allocate() and that wasn;t the case here.
GtkWindow always queues a resize on style updates if there is
a grip, because it may have been the grip size style properties
that changed. However, even if it *were*, and it likely wasn't
that would not affect the windows size request, so no need
to queue a resize.
This reverts the size_allocate removal from commit
8449e05865. That code was using
_gtk_window_set_allocation() instead of gtk_widget_set_allocation(). And
that broke glade.
Showing mnemonics immediately on modifier press can be annoying and
distracting when the user is just trying to Alt+Tab into another
application/window since the mnemonic will show up and quickly vanish
again when we receive the focus out event.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=672431
Each GtkWindow with an associated GtkApplication should add this as
"app" to its action context. Each GtkApplicationWindow is its own
GActionGroup, and it should add itself to itself with the prefix "win".
There is now some duplication here because we have the new GActionMuxer
hierarchy managed by GtkWidget, but GtkApplicationWindow still carries
its own muxer. The redundancy will be removed in a future patch.
This call was forcing needless work since gtk_window_map() already
does a gdk_window_show() which initially sets GDK_WINDOW_STATE_FOCUSED
that we then handle regularly on the widget's window state event
handler.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=673237
gtk_window_get/set_attached_to() is a new API that allows for windows to
be attached to a GtkWidget.
The attachment is a logical binding between the toplevel window and the
widget that generated it; this kind of information is currently used to
propagate style information from the widget to the window, but is also
useful e.g. for accessibility.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=666103
