It makes sense to connect the begin/update/end events
for touchpad swipes and pinches in a sequence. This
commit adds the plumbing for it, but not backends
are setting sequences yet.
In some circumstances (e.g. activating with a stylus something that
closes a window), we can receive zwp_tablet_tool.proximity_out without
receiving a zwp_tablet_tool.up beforehand.
In those cases, we are not expecting neither .up nor .button, so
reset the stylus device button modifiers on proximity_out.
Fixes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/issues/4103
We are looking up the seat logical pointer modifiers (i.e. the wl_pointer),
not the ones for the tablet tool device. This breaks accounting further
along in GTK leaving stuck implicit grabs.
Fixes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/issues/4102
If the pointer capability is added, pointer swipe and pinch gestures
will be created. However, if the pointer capability is removed, the
gesture objects won't be destroyed.
If the pointer capability is removed and added several times in a row,
for example due to plugging and unplugging physical mouse, this can lead
to leaking the old gesture objects.
In order to prevent that, this change makes the seat destroy swipe and
pinch gestures when the pointer capability is withdrawn.
The releasing of grabs while a button is pressed (e.g. after starting dnd, or
dragging the window, or going to overview with a pressed button, etc...) was
generalized here in https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1879.
However we shouldn't break all grabs here. In the case of grabbing popups,
compositors will still emit crossing events between client surfaces (e.g.
popping up and selecting a menu item via press-drag-release), breaking all
grabs here means inconsistent client state, that was
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/issues/2746.
That was fixed in mutter, by essentially making implicit grabs
owner_events=FALSE, however that breaks the mentioned use pattern entirely.
Mutter is changing this behavior back, so GTK should handle these crossing
events.
The grab that we are interested in breaking here is the implicit pointer
one. Popups will be dismissed via other means if the compositor says their
active grab needs breaking. This still leaves dnd/move/resize drags in
one place, while not allowing #2746 to happen with popups.
These events don't make sense on physical devices (for starters, they
are relative to the logical pointer position). Use this device for
those events, also happens to be what the upper parts expect of them.
When destroying a wl_surface (e.g. when a window or menu is closed), the
surface may continue to exist in the compositor slightly longer than on
the client side. In that case, the surface can still receive input
events, which need to be ignored gracefully.
In particular, this prevents segfaulting on wl_surface_get_user_data()
in that situation.
Reported in
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/issues/3296
The same issue for pointers/keyboards was reported in
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693338
and fixed with in
bfd7137ffb3625f17857a8fc099a72
In pointer_surface_update_scale(), only rescale the cursor surface when
the scale has actually changed and the cursor is on at least one output.
fixes https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/issues/3350
Right now, this issue is not completely understood, so it might also
involve some questionable handling of cursor surface by sway/wlroots.
However, irrespective of that issue, this patch avoids unnecessary calls to the
compositor, and there should be no drawback: Whenever the pointer enters
a new output, pointer_surface_update_scale() will be called again, such
that correct scaling of the cursor is still ensured.
There is a slight difference: When the cursor leaves the last output,
previously the image was reset to scale factor 1. Now, it keeps whatever
was last. That might be more sensible than the previous behaviour,
assuming that it's likely that when the cursor enter an output again, it
has the same scaling. Alternatively, if one cares about resource usage
at this level, it might make more sense to destroy the surface than
rescaling to 1.
Mapping a surface under Wayland is an asynchronous process, where one
creates a surface and commits an initial state without having drawn
anything, then waiting for a configuration, which then is acknowledged
and content is painted and committed. Not until having received this
configuration is a surface actually mapped, so wait with setting the
mappedness until this.
The GdkWayland API takes generic GDK types and performs a run time
check, which means we need to properly annotate the actual expected
type in order to have methods recognised as such.
Make GdkEvents hold a single GdkDevice. This device is closer to
the logical device conceptually, although it must be sufficient for
device checks (i.e. GdkInputSource), which makes it similar to the
physical devices.
Make the logical devices have a more accurate GdkInputSource where
needed, and conflate the event devices altogether.
This is not used anymore now that surfaces are always toplevel in the
semantics of GdkWindow where child windows were available. We can drop
that and simplify the vfunc just a bit more.
Fixes#2765
If the tablet gets removed/freed while there are pad events in flight,
we leave a dangling pointer from the pad to the tablet, which may
lead to invalid reads/writes when handling the pad event(s).
