Visual Studio does not support things like -Wl,export-dynamic, so we
need to export those symbols by using __declspec(dllexport). So, we
decorate these with macros which we define accordingly for this purpose.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=785210
We wait for a few 100ms for rendering to settle in various WMs. So far
we only did that for windows that were controlled by the WM (aka
toplevels).
With modern compositing gnome-shell however, this now also applies to
override-redirect windows, so we now wait there, too.
This makes the reftests a lot slower, but they now actually work when
running make check in gnome-shell.
It's getting harder and harder to find a dummy style property to use
here, so remove the test case since style properties should be going
away soon anyway.
Previously, we would request a size of 0×0 when the transition type was
NONE and the child un-revealed, making the revealer in this case a
gtk_widget_set_visible replacement. Instead, to the exact same thing we
do in the CROSSFADE case and request the child size instead. This also
keeps the revealer from under allocating the child when the transition
type is set to NONE.
Add :dir(ltr) where expected, i.e. everywhere we now have a widget but
had a gadget before.
Also, fix the expected output to expect mark subnodes in the order
specified in the GtkScale does, i.e.
├── mark
├── [label]
╰── indicator
for marks at the top of the scale and
├── mark
├── indicator
╰── [label]
For marks at the bottom of the scale.
Events that get to gtk_main_do_event() have the toplevel GdkWindow
as event->any.window. Also, ensure that coordinates fall within
sensible places of the windows, since those might have shadows,
headerbars and whatnot on wayland.
It was only testing the default configuration, where overlay scrolling
is on and both scrollbars use POLICY_AUTOMATIC. We should also test the
other 3 configurations that are available by including non-overlay
scrollbars and/or those that use POLICY_ALWAYS.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778853
The `-export-dynamic` flag is a libtool-specific flag; since we're not
using libtool with Meson, we should instruct the C compiler to use the
appropriate linker flag instead.
Copy the location of the test data and binaries from the autotools
build, even though it's not really correct; currently we install the
test data under libexecdir, but it should live under datadir, and we
should use `G_TEST_DIST` to figure it out.
The `state` subdirectory is missing.
Add back dependencies on libgdk_dep and libsk_dep which are declared
dependencies. We removed this before because these declarations had
link_with: lines that dragged in the static libgdk.a and libgsk.a libs
which are linked into libgtk-4.so anyway and thus shouldn't be used
when linking internal exes/tools against libgtk-4. Remove the static
libs from the declared dependencies and have libgtk link those in
explicitly, so that the declared deps now just provide all the built
dependencies and include dirs and such for declared libgtk_dep users
such as the internal exes/tools, which want all the generated gsk/gdk/gtk
headers to exist before attempting to compile anything against the
gtk+ headers.
Almost all of these tests include gtk/gtk.h so we need
to dep on libgtk not just libgdk. Otherwise compilation
fails because graphene.h include can't be found.
This was only every implemented under X11, and with CSD,
this is clearly in the application realm. We should not
pretend that we can support it on the toolkit level.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=775061
It was only testing the default configuration where overlay-scrolling is
TRUE and the policy is POLICY_AUTOMATIC. We should also test FALSE and
POLICY_ALWAYS. This commit adds those tests and makes the !overlay &&
POLICY_ALWAYS case pass by excluding the size of the relevant scrollbar,
as we are only interested in whether the content size is as requested.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778853
gboolean ret for whether gtk_text_iter_backward_line() moved the iter
was declared but not used anywhere. I presume it was meant to be
checked, and it passes now, so let’s do it.
gtk_text_iter_backward_line() checks the value of
real->line_char_offset without previously calling
ensure_char_offsets (real) to make sure the former
is up-to-date.
As a consequence of this, when gtk_text_iter_backward_line()
is called after a gtk_text_buffer_insert_range() in the
first line of buffer, the iter is not moved to the start of
the line, and the return value is wrong.
Fixed by adding the ensure_char_offsets() call.
A test case for this bug is added to the textiter gtk testsuite.
Images with just an aspect ratio, but without a size, should be scaled
to be fully visible in the given area.
But we scaled them to completely cover the given area, which made them
partially invisible.
Reftest included.
Instead of
-gtk-icon-effect: dim;
-gtk-icon-effect: hilight;
we now use
-gtk-icon-filter: opacity(0.5);
-gtk-icon-filter: brightness(1.2);
respectively.
When the first/last color stop is not at 0%/100%, we need to start the
repeating at their offsets and not at 0%/100%.
Attached reftest demonstrates the problem.
When the background-clip of the background is smaller than the
background-clip of blended images, not pushing a group is wrong.
Test testing exactly that included.
This merged gtk, gdk and gsk into one library, making it possible to
have internal private APIs between gtk them, as well as producing more
efficient code.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=773100
These complicate a lot of GdkWindow internals to implement features
that not a lot of apps use, and will be better achieved using gsk.
So, we just drop it all.
Newer versions of Automake warn about forward compatibility when the
build uses sources in sub-directories without the subdir-objects option.
Both GTK+ and GDK have an almost-but-not-quite non-recursive Automake
layout, with sources in sub-directories contributing to the build of a
top-level object.
In theory, just adding subdir-objects to AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE would be
enough, but the test suite references sources in a different top-level
in order to build tests that verify the implementation of private data
structures. This is not really allowed when using subdir-objects and out
of srcdir builds. In order to fix this case, we require some ad hoc
rules to create symbolic links in the appropriate build directory.
And replaces its usages in GtkTextView/GtkStyleContext with a hard-coded
0.04 which was the default value for cursor-aspect-ratio. Also remove
the public gtk_draw_insertion_cursor which used draw_insertion_cursor
which in turn looked up cursor-aspect-ratio
In order to eliminate g_test_expect_message() (which doesn’t work with
G_LOG_USE_STRUCTURED), make the warning about the fallback theme not
existing be conditional on the icon theme search path containing a
system path. Any application code which modifies the search path does so
through appends and prepends, so this should not affect whether the
warning is emitted in production.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=769485
Previously a style cascade's parent could not have a parent itself. That
represented the two levels at which you could add a style provider: at
the screen level, with gtk_style_context_add_provider_for_screen(), and
at the style context level, with gtk_style_context_add_provider().
This commit changes no functionality, but this change will be necessary
for adding style providers in the future that apply to a subtree of the
widget tree. It relaxes the requirement that a style cascade's parent
must not have a parent, since in the future a style context may be
affected by any number of parent widgets' style contexts.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751409
The maximum content size does not increase the minimum request
but only ensures that both minimum and natural requests do not
exceed the maximum setting.
Commit 023f406c96 has a typo that results
in this error:
../../../testsuite/gtk/notify.c: In function 'test_type':
../../../testsuite/gtk/notify.c:679:54: error: expected expression
before ')' token
(g_str_equal (pspec->name, "max-content-width") ||)
^
The allowed values for the max-content- properties depend
on the value of the min-content- properties, in a way that
our simple test is not prepared to deal with. Just skip
them for now.
Setting the font: shorthand to something like smaller is not
in line with the css spec. Just set the font-size: property
for this.
Also fix the other font: shorthand to specify size and family
according to the css spec.
