Given that Wayland has no global coordinate, the only way for gdk to
retrieve the monitor a window last entered is to retrieve it from the
GdkWaylandWindow itself.
Implement the backend specific get_monitor_at_window() to return the
monitor that was last entered by the window.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766566
In Wayland, surfaces get an enter/leave notification each time they
enter or leave an output.
Add an API to GdkWaylandWindow to retrieve the output the window has
last entered.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766566
Only generate crossing events on wl_touch.down for the virtual master
device used for touch events, and only whenever this virtual device
actually moves across surfaces. This behavior resembles better what is
expected in X11, where the pointer is warped to the touch position
on XITouchBegin.
This avoids the double emission of leave events when the pointer
emulating touch is lifted, that crossing event will be instead
generated when/if the focus surface changes.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766314
This is required for proper integration with any other library/application that
may perform wayland API calls and poll() the wayland fd from multiple threads.
Using wl_display_dispatch{_queue}() is thread-safe if not mixed with custom
poll() usage, which GSource/GMainContext does.
Essentially, the problem is that multiple threads polling and reading
the same fd is extremely racy. Use the wayland provided API for allowing
concurrent access to the wayland display fd.
See the wayland man pages for wl_display_prepare_read(),
wl_display_cancel_read() and wl_display_read_events() for more details.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763852
Use of g_signal_handlers_disconnect_by_func() needs to do more work than
necessary to find all the matching handlers. Instead, just hold on to the
signal identifier and remove it directly so we hit the fast path.
Not terribly ground breaking in terms of performance gains, but its done
enough to be worthwhile.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766049
The wayland specification for discrete step information for scroll and
other axes reads:
| The discrete value carries the directional information. e.g. a
| value of -2 is two steps towards the negative direction of this axis.
mutter sets a value of 1 for SCROLL_DOWN events and -1 for SCROLL_UP
events.
gdkdevice Wayland backend does the opposite, it translates a positive
discrete value as SCROLL_UP and a negative value as SCROLL_DOWN, which
ends up inverting the scrolling direction.
Fix the logic in gdkdevice Wayland to use a positive value as
SCROLL_DOWN and a negative value as SCROLL_UP so that it matches mutter
and weston logic.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765907
NoSymbol is not a valid GDK symbol (it only has the concept of
VoidSymbol, for some reason, which is neither the same thing nor
produced by any sane keymap). Passing NoSymbol events through to GTK+
apps is unlikely to produce anything useful.
In particular, this meant VTE would scroll to the end of the buffer when
pressing Fn (required for Page Up/Down on Macs), as it was receiving a
keypress that wasn't a modifeir. This does not happen on X11, as the
KEY_FN keycode is above 255, so does not get sent to clients.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=764825
We don't care about the specific (possibly client-side) window that
requested the focus here, only the toplevel. Fixes mistakenly sent
focus events when the grab happens inside the current focus window.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762756
Always associate a drag context with a GdkDisplay and use that when
getting a cursor for a given action.
If we don't do this, dragging on a window that doesn't use the default
display will make us use cursors from the wrong display.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765565
Don't track all orphaned dialogs globally, as mixing them up with each
other would in most cases trigger errors when we try to pass bogus
values to Wayland requests.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765474
The naming of pointers to GdkWaylandDisplay's were inconsistent.
Running the following commands in gtk+/gdk/wayland illustrate the
inconsistency:
$ grep -r '\<display_wayland\>' *.[ch] | wc -l
195
$ grep -r '\<wayland_display\>' *.[ch] | wc -l
81
This patch renames all occurrences of "wayland_display" to
"display_wayland". This is also consistent with naming in the X11
backend. A couple of whitespace changes were done as well in places
where the rename was already done, that added line breaks to long lines
that stood out.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765474
When synthesizing keyboard repeat, we can potentially drift further from
the mark depending on the timing of the frame callback and how long it
took to deliver the event.
This patch attempts to reduce this by tracking from a stable epoch the
time of our next keyboard repeat.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765567
Windows save in hardware_keycode an information which is not so low
level and some application require the hardware scancode.
As Windows provides this information save it in GdkEventPrivate
and provide a function to get this information.
For no Windows system the function return the hardware_keycode instead.
Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio <fziglio@redhat.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765259
If we get gdk_wayland_seat_flush_frame_event() with no previous event to be
flushed, we fallback into the scroll event checks. However, there's no check
performed there as to whether it really scrolled, so it'd always send a smooth
scroll event with 0/0 deltas in this case.
This should be mostly harmless, but still, we should only end up emitting scroll
events if those really happened.
The frame event is also meant to compress wl_pointer.leave events, at this
point the focus surface will be definitely NULL. In the end, wl_pointer.frame
should flush the last composed event despite the pointer focus.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765065
Since Wayland is using libxkbcommon, it inherits X unfortunate
real/virtual modifier distinction, so we have to do the same
gymnastics we do for X to map between the two.
This should fix matching of accelerators using virtual modifiers
(modulo gnome-shell bugs regarding the handling of Super).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=764424
On wayland, such axes are per-tool, we must update device capabilities
on the fly as new tools enter proximity, first the slave device so
it matches the current tool, and then the master device so it looks
the same than the current slave device.
Only the management of tablets and tools is added so far. No tablet events
are yet interpreted.
As it's been the tradition in GTK+, erasers are split into their own device,
whereas the rest of the tools are meant to be routed through the
GDK_SOURCE_PEN device. Both pen/eraser devices are slaves to a master
pointer device, separate to wl_pointer's. This is so each tablet can
maintain its own cursor/positioning accounting.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Chandler Paul <thatslyude@gmail.com>
This will enable multiple "pointers" to have separate data here.
Will come out useful when adding support for tablets, as they
will have a separate cursor for all purposes.
gnome-control-center is calling gtk_window_resize() on configure-event
signals which leads to a busy loop.
Avoids such a busy loop by not re-configuring a window with the same
size, unless this is coming from and xdg-shell configure.
bugzilla: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=764374
