gdk-wayland backend would not re-configure a surface when its size and
scale match the known size and scale.
But there might be a pending xdg_surface_configure() that would revert
this change so we should re-configure even if the currently known
size/scale match, otherwise we may end up with a wrong size after the
xdg_surface_configure() is received.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758901
If we "release" the button first, the drag will be eventually cancelled,
we must first signal GDK_DROP_FINISHED, and then release the button so
the success status prevails.
It doesn't make a lot of sense to have this stored as data offer data,
rather together with the source_targets array, which is what we're
poking here in the end.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758713
Dissociate ownership from our maintenance of wl_data_source objects.
The only place where ownership must be updated together is
data_source.cancelled, for the other places GDK should take care of
setting up the right ownership, even if at a different order than
we'd expect here.
This fixes GTK+ apps on wayland being locally confused about the
current selection ownership. Because gtk_selection_add_targets()
results in a wl_data_source being created, and ownership being
updated right away, early callers of this will change the ownership
even if the widget it's being called on didn't explicitly request
the selection ownership yet.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758660
While searching for the cause of bug 746745 it was discovered that one could
not set WS_EX_TOPMOST extended window style with SetWindowLong(),
but must use SetWindowPos() for that purpose.
This was never a problem most likely because it is highly unlikely for windows
to acquire/lose WS_EX_TOPMOST after they are created, by means other
than SetWindowPos() (which GTK does use to raise/lower windows and
set/remove keep_above), and because trying to set/unset WS_EX_TOPMOST with
SetWindowLong() results in WS_EX_TOPMOST merely not being set/unset (that is,
other styles are still set/unset within the same call and no error is
signalled).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758483
Instead of having our own copy of the pointer gestures XML file, use
the one installed by wayland-protocols.
Since pointer gestures is an unstable protocol, it went through the
unstable protocol naming convention changes, which is reflected in this
commit.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758634
After the grab is finished, we would expect an enter event, and
GDK updating internally the cursor for that window and device.
This means there is no need at all to store it separately in the
backend.
As a side effect, animated cursors are now also possible on grab
icons.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=735847
The way master devices detach from their other master counterpart is
vulnerable to infinite recursion due to the way we first recurse on
the other device before clearing the pointer, this may happen if
that last reference to the other master device is held by the
device->associated field.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732742
Other backends take care of the cairo surface destruction in
GdkWindow::destroy. We must do the same here, or the cairo_surface
and its corresponding wl_buffer are left dangling.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=747295
This prevents normal application windows (and other kinds of windows)
from being moved up in Z-order to be above windows that have the
always-on-top bit set. Doing so would make the previously-normal windows
in question also always-on-top implicitly.
Windows that are already always-on-top will be restacked on top of other
always-on-top windows too.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746745
If the buffer of a cursor is NULL, for example if its an empty cursor,
just set the cursor surface to NULL as well. Not doing this we'll use
uninitialized hotspot coordinates, dimensions and scales.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758025
This GdkDragContext should be created even if we don't have pointer
capabilities. Make it created on add_seat(), and only set the device
on wl_seat.capabilities, so it can be set to either master pointer.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741066
We use the high-level gdk_device_get_window_at_position() to figure
out the window, although this one actually tries to find out the
current window under the device coordinates, which might well fall
outside the window, so NULL is returned in those cases.
Fix this by using the lower level _gdk_device_window_at_position()
that will return the toplevel without further lookups, so is more
desirable here.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758250
Now that we have multiple master pointers, this call may pick the wrong one.
Instead, pick the GdkWaylandDeviceData from the first device, and pick the
master pointer from there.
The common GDK code accounts for "pointer emulating" touch sequences to be
synchronized with the pointer position by the windowing system.
However on Wayland pointer and touch are completely independent, the backend
attempts to implement pointer emulation, but doesn't account for the
possible crossing events happening when the user switches from pointer to
touch or the opposite.
In order to fix this, and to ensure we don't have to interact with the
master pointer (which backs the wl_pointer), separate the touch interface
to have its own master pointer, and ensure crossing events are emitted on
it, so the picture of an "emulated pointer" is complete above the backend.
Inspired in a former patch by Jonny Lamb <jonnylamb@gnome.org>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=750845
We were using that range for the extra buttons after left/right/middle,
while this is harmless for clients not handling extra buttons (we
used to translate those button events into scroll events in x11 anyway)
this will be unexpected for clients that do handle additional mouse
buttons themselves (eg. back/forward buttons present in some mice).
In order to remain compatible with X11, those need to be assigned from
button 8 onwards.
Also, include input.h, and stop using magic numbers here.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758072
Commit 1266d15c4 also broke Xwayland, as it does the same trick
than VMWare pointers. Let's extend the heuristic to check for "pointer"
in the device name, what can possibly go wrong...
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757358
We currently just look for a master device with input source MOUSE.
After recent changes to the way input devices are classified, xwayland
on my system comes up with a virtual core pointer that has input
source TOUCHSCREEN. This was causing assertion failures. Be a little
more careful and accept a touchscreen as core pointer, if there is
no mouse.
VMWare seems to create mouse devices with abs axes which confuses
our detection of single-touch touchscreens. Those have though a
name we can match on ("VirtualPS/2 VMware VMMouse"), it should
be pretty safe to assume that no real touchscreens have "mouse"
in their name...
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757358
A follow up on the previous patch. We should use DestroyWindow
directly since it has a different calling convention than
the expected callback for g_clear_pointer
When moving/scrolling a child window we can't use the current clip
region to limit what is invalidated, because there may be a pixel
cache that listens for changes outside the clip region. Instead
invalidate the entire area and rely on the invalidation code to limit
the repaint to the actually visible area.
Those won't have ABS_MT_* axes, so won't be reported has having
XITouchClassInfo. Fallback on these to checking whether abs x/y axes are
available. After the Wacom checks, any remaining device with absolute axes
should be touchscreens, and GDK_SOURCE_MOUSE does indeed just make sense on
devices with relative axes.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757358
Instead of handling WM_DISPLAYCHANGE on every GdkWindow, only handle
it on an ad-hoc hidden window we create when opening the display.
This has two reasons:
1) we want emit the display::size-changed signal even if there are no
gtk windows currently open
2) we want to emit the signal just once and not once for every window
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757324
Make sure the wayland backend sets a new geometry when the client
resizes itself, otherwise the compositor won't be notified and may
revert to the old size on state changes.
Thanks to Jasper St. Pierre <jstpierre@mecheye.net> who pointed out the
problem in gtk+.
bugzilla: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=755051
gdk_pixbuf_get_from_window() paints the given window onto a new cairo
surface. Create that new surface with the same device scale as the
window so that the result is not scaled down on hidpi screens.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757147
