Commit 4bb3d64414 introduced a limitation
to GtkRange style properties; when stepper-spacing is > 0,
trough-under-steppers is automatically set to FALSE; this means that
setting a spacing between the steppers (e.g. the scrollbar buttons) and
the trough (i.e. the area over which the slider is free to move) would
make the buttons always get the full allocation on the !orientation
direction.
The rationale is without this limitation, you would get an area which
seems clickable, but it's actually not.
While this is true, and undesirable, for big stepper spacings, themes
that use trough-under-steppers (which is TRUE by default anyway),
might want to set smaller spacings to avoid drawing a double line between
the button and the slider borders.
To add confusion, the documentation got it flipped, i.e. it stated
setting a positive stepper-spacing would set trough-under-steppers to
TRUE (which would also make the behavior expected by commit
4bb3d64414 impossible).
I don't think hardcoding either of the two limitations is a good thing.
We should let themes handle this instead, and remove this limitation. If
you want the old behavior, you can manually set trough-under-steppers to
FALSE if you set a positive stepper-spacing in your theme.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=644777
GtkFileChooserDefault watches the toplevel and montitors "set-focus"
signal on it... however the connection needs to be remade when the
GtkFileChooserDialog is in an embedded toplevel.
Measure's taken: GtkWindow propagates hierarchy changes when
_gtk_window_set_is_toplevel() is called, gtk_widget_unparent()
unsets the widget's parent window earlier in the function so that
the possible hierarchy change is still able to properly access the hierarchy.
GtkFileChooserDefault checks if the "new" toplevel is indeed
gtk_widget_is_toplevel() but not the old one, GtkRange has been
updated to use gtk_widget_is_toplevel() inside it's hierarhcy_changed
vfunc, other classes already do this properly.
We need to be a little more careful when determining the overlap
between the new allocation and the grip area. This was causing
vertical scrollbars in evince to overlap with the grip.
If there are both horizontal and vertical scrollbars, there is
an unused 'corner' into which the resize grip fits. Individual
scrollbars need to be shortened and moved to make room for the
resize grip.
The keysyms create a lot of potential namespace conflicts for
C, and are especially problematic for introspection, where we take
constants into the namespace, so GDK_Display conflicts with GdkDisplay.
For C application compatiblity, add gdkkeysyms-compat.h which uses
the old names.
Just one user in GTK+ continues to use gdkkeysyms-compat.h, which is
the gtkimcontextsimple.c, since porting that requires porting more
custom Perl code.
This was a style property to let theme engines 'opt-in' to more
correct behaviour while maintaining compatibility with existing
themes. GTK+ 3 engines are expected to handle the more correct
behaviour.
This was a style property to let theme engines 'opt-in' to more
correct behaviour while maintaining compatibility with existing
themes. GTK+ 3 engines are expected to handle the more correct
behaviour.
This was a style property to let theme engines 'opt-in' to more
correct behaviour while maintaining compatibility with existing
themes. GTK+ 3 engines are expected to handle the more correct
behaviour.
As usual, this is protected by a style property:
GtkRange::stepper-position-details
The detail strings are
<detail>_start, <detail>_end and <detail>_middle.
See bug 621250
In the early 2.14.x releases, GtkAdjustment was changed to enforce
that values are restricted to the range [lower, upper - page_size].
This has always been the documented behaviour, and the recommended
practice is to set page_size to 0 when using adjustments for simple
scalar values, like in a slider or spin button.
Due to the large number of applications that are affected by this
change, the behaviour has been reverted to the old behaviour in
2.14.3, with an explicit warning that this change will be
reintroduced in 2.90.
This reverts commit e6373738fc.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=619474
