If we set c_marshaller manually, then g_signal_newv() will not setup a
va_marshaller for us. However, if we provide c_marshaller as NULL, it will
setup both the c_marshaller (to g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID) and
va_marshaller (to g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOIDv) for us.
Signal emittion was added in 6f857f87dc commit and it seems that
this is only place where selected_row is set after emitting signal.
Because of this gtk_list_box_get_selected_row currently returns NULL
as selected row if selection mode is set to GTK_SELECTION_BROWSE.
Unparenting a GtkListBoxRow can drop its last reference, which
will free its memory. Right after unparenting, though, we were
accessing the row's iter - which assumes that the row is still
alive. This causes a crash when, for example, binding two or
more models to the listbox.
Fix that by storing the iter in a variable, and not trying to
access it after unparenting. After unparenting, the variables
that are potentially garbage were explicitly assigned NULL for
clarity.
Fixes https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/issues/1258
This is an automated change doing these command:
git sed -f g gtk_widget_set_has_window gtk_widget_set_has_surface
git sed -f g gtk_widget_get_has_window gtk_widget_get_has_surface
git sed -f g gtk_widget_set_parent_window gtk_widget_set_parent_surface
git sed -f g gtk_widget_get_parent_window gtk_widget_get_parent_surface
git sed -f g gtk_widget_set_window gtk_widget_set_surface
git sed -f g gtk_widget_get_window gtk_widget_get_surface
git sed -f g gtk_widget_register_window gtk_widget_register_surface
git sed -f g gtk_widget_unregister_window gtk_widget_unregister_surface
git checkout NEWS*
Remove all the old 2.x and 3.x version annotations.
GTK+ 4 is a new start, and from the perspective of a
GTK+ 4 developer all these APIs have been around since
the beginning.
We don't want a pointer that is moved off a scrollbar
to trigger a row when it gets released. To avoid this,
require an explicit opt-in to handling unpaired-releases.
The code was asserting something that was not always holding
true. We can hit row == NULL here on page-up too. Handle that
case by moving to the first row.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=791549
When a widget unparents its child widget manually in finalize, this can
lead to the parent-set signal being emitted for those child widgets. The
parent already has a ref_count of 0 though, so it can't be used in a
meaningful way. Specifically, emitting the signal will already try to
ref the parent which prints a critical.
Since GtkWidget already has a "parent" property, one can use its notify
signal instead to get notified when the parent widget changes.
This patch makes that work using 1 of 2 options:
1. Add all missing enums to the switch statement
or
2. Cast the switch argument to a uint to avoid having to do that (mostly
for GdkEventType).
I even found a bug while doing that: clearing a GtkImage with a surface
did not notify thae surface property.
The reason for enabling this flag even though it is tedious at times is
that it is very useful when adding values to an enum, because it makes
GTK immediately warn about all the switch statements where this enum is
relevant.
And I expect changes to enums to be frequent during the GTK4 development
cycle.
Those worked similarly to those in GtkFlowBox, but would additionally
handle "active" state for child rows. Simplify this to just enabling/
disabling active state on gesture press/release, we don't get the
nice state updates when hovering around with a mouse button pressed,
but the rationale from flowbox applies here, and makes a nice cleanup.
Since gtk+ draws more than the widget and allocates more size to it than
it knows about, this flag doesn't work anymore. Removing it (or setting
it to TRUE for widgets that used to set it to FALSE) fixes drawing
invalidation when these widgets get allocated a new size.
Since setting a clip is mandatory for almost all widgets, we can as well
change the size-allocate signature to include a out_clip parameter, just
like GtkCssGadget did. And since we now always propagate baselines, we
might as well pass that one on to size-allocate.
This way we can also make sure to transform the clip returned from
size-allocate to parent-coordinates, i.e. the same coordinate space
priv->allocation is in.
Instead of hopping through 7 different functions to do that, just
remove all rows directly. This also mean we'll only remove rows and not
other children that've been added like placeholders.
Drop the in_widget flag since motion events the listbox receives are
always inside the listbox. Also drop the manual coordinate translation
code using GdkWindows.
We now rely on toplevels receiving and forwarding all the events
the windowing should be able to handle. Event masks are no longer a
way to determine whether an event is deliverable ot a widget.
Events will always be delivered in the three captured/target/bubbled
phases, widgets can now just attach GtkEventControllers and let those
handle the events.
Turns out that the destination is the last parameter, not the first one.
This fixes the flickering in the first page of the widget-factory when
using the expander on page 2.
GtkListBox is not a windowed widget anymore so we can't use
gtk_widget_get_window. Just directly access priv->view_window instead to
get the right window.
These complicate a lot of GdkWindow internals to implement features
that not a lot of apps use, and will be better achieved using gsk.
So, we just drop it all.
Add a new ::measure vfunc similar to GtkCssGadget's that widget
implementations have to override instead of the old get_preferred_width,
get_preferred_height, get_preferred_width_for_height,
get_preferred_height_for_width and
get_preferred_height_and_baseline_for_width.
The code always assumed that getting a row at a certain 'y' was
possible but if the list box has more empty space than rows then a
valid row may not be retrieved.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=770703
do_sort will crash if sort_func is not defined. Instead of adding a check
there in the hot path, just check for sort_func before invalidating the
sort of the underlying GSequence.
When the current cursor_row is taller than the page_size we get from the
GtkAdjustment, the previous code would not actually cause any scrolling,
so make sure we just take the row after or before the cursor_row in that
case.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765261
Always have Since: annotations at the very bottom, use the correct
ClassName::signal-name/ClassName:property-name syntax, fix a few typos
in type names, wrong function names, non-existing type names, etc.
Similar to buttons-in-toolbars, it can make sense for listbox rows
to not take away the focus from the main application view, for
instance when used for navigation. Support this by taking the newly
added GtkWidget:focus-on-click property into account.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757269
These days exposure happens only on the native windows (generally the
toplevel window) and is propagated down recursively. The expose event
is only useful for backwards compat, and in fact, for double buffered
widgets we totally ignore the event (and non-double buffering breaks
on wayland).
So, by not setting the mask we avoid emitting these events and then
later ignoring them.
We still keep it on eventbox, fixed and layout as these are used
in weird ways that want backwards compat.
Do not use .button anymore.
This is for 2 reasons:
1. The styling is seperate in our themes, so it doesn't make sense to
share the style class.
2. Due to the shared styling of .buton, listbox rows inherit all the
special case styles that exist for buttons - such as linked buttons,
header buttons, entry buttons, spinbutton buttons, etc. This means
that the code has to check all these special cases all the time and
for listbox rows, this is very slow.
Previously we were assuming that only list box rows could occur
as focus children of a list box, and would crash if that wasn't
the case. This commit handles this case, and integrates focusable
headers into directional keynav and the focus chain.
The typical case of using separators as headers is not affected
by this change.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=753694
