Include the child widget path in the returned path now. This allows
customizing the path of the current widgets - like adding flags to child
widgets (and maybe siblings in the future).
Patches by Benjamin Otte.
The "invalidate last column" hack is removed. It is now of no use since
the entire widget will be redrawn when a single column changes.
We have to redraw if we are below a couple of rows that changed height
in do_validate_rows(). This will still require a redraw for a large
amount of cases, can we do better? You would expect that a redraw of
the tree view is not required when the dy changes with the same delta
as the delta of the height accrued when validating the nodes. This
further optimization will likely require changes to the top_row/dy
synchronization code.
It turns out that the gtk_grab_remove() can trigger a do_prelight()
call, which may end up changing prelight_node, and then the state
gets messed up. Moving the grab removal until after we're done with
button_pressed_node and prlight_node makes expanders work reliably.
One thing that is still not right is that the expander doesn't get
prelight again after the animation is done, if you manage to release
without any additional motion events.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=641039
Expander animation has been replaced by implicit animations
from the style context.
Column headers are also properly themed, GtkContainer::get_path_for_child()
is implemented and the treeview resets column buttons style on columns
being reordered.
The default CSS has changed to theme treeviews sensibly.
This function is useful to figure out whether the tree view is "blank"
at a given location. For such locations you might want to popup a
custom popup menu, clear the current selection or start rubber banding.
In the future, we are planning on updating GtkTreeView's user
interactions to take advantage of this new function.
Part of bug 350618.
I have never really liked the updates done to the adjustments in
do_validate_rows() and other validation functions. But it is really
required. I have to come up with a real solution to this one day.
Check (x, y) is inside background area. If yes, continue processing
and clamp the coordinates into cell area. This way we will properly
handle getting a cell (which is only used for setting the focus cell)
for clicks in the indentation area (in LTR and RTL mode) and clicks
in the focus rectangle area in case focus-line-width is large.
When focus is initially grabbed and there is no focus column, when selecting
the first column for focus, further explicitly focus into the first cell
using gtk_cell_area_focus().
the edge.
When focusing left/right or up/down inside GtkCellArea, now we save what
was the last focused cell and if we hit the side (or top or bottom) of
the view we then restore focus to the last focused cell.
This function did alot of nothing, gtk_cell_area_focus() simply returns whether
the focus stays in the area (column) or not, seems not to cause regressions to
just call it directly instead.
Instead this is now enforced in gtk_tree_view_get_cell_area_height().
There are rows for which a height in between 0 and expander_size is
allowed, for example separator rows.
This argument allows the caller to specify that only an editable
cell should start editing but an activatable cell should not toggle
it's state, this is important for public apis like
gtk_tree_view_set_cursor_on_cell() which are only intended to
programatically bring attention to the editing of a specific
row or cell but not actually change any data.
GtkTreeView & CellAreaScaffold updated for the last minute api change.
