Delay the keyboard settings creation until we're delivering the key
press. This means we don't have to create the settings for a server that
sends us repeat information.
xdg-shell has moved on and replaced set_margin with set_window_geometry.
To properly support set_window_geometry requires a full rewrite of how
we've been dealing with toplevel windows for now, so just don't set any
margin until we can have a proper toplevel window abstraction in GTK+.
gdk_x11_display_set_window_scale() affects the interpretation of the
Xft/DPI XSETTING - it is substituted inside GDK with the value of
Gdk/UnscaledDPI xsetting. However, this change is not propagated to
GTK+ and from GTK+ back to gdk_screen_set_resolution() until the
main loop is run.
Fix this by handling the screen resolution directly in gdk/x11.
This requires duplication of code between GDK and GTK+ since we still
have to handle DPI in GTK+ in the case that GdkSettings:gtk-xft-dpi
is set by the application.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733076
The way that GtkTextView et al pop up their context menu is to first
query to see if the clipboard has some text, and if so, enable the Paste
menu item. But since the Wayland backend hasn't had the greatest
selection and clipboard code, the callback for the clipboard got dropped
on the floor.
Add some simple code to respond to the TARGETS selection.
This makes right-clicking on a GtkTextView work fine.
Traditionally, the way painting was done in GTK+ was with the
"expose-event" handler, where you'd use GDK methods to do drawing on
your surface. In GTK+ 2.24, we added cairo support with gdk_cairo_create,
so you could paint your graphics with cairo.
Since then, we've added client-side windows, double buffering, the paint
clock, and various other enhancements, and the modern way to do drawing
is to connect to the "draw" signal on GtkWidget, which hands you a
cairo_t. To do double-buffering, the cairo_t we hand you is actually on
a secret surface, not the actual backing store of the window, and when
the draw handler completes we blit it into the main backing store
atomically.
The code to do this is with the APIs gdk_window_begin_paint_region,
which creates the temporary surface, and gdk_window_end_paint which
blits it back into the backing store. GTK+'s implementation of the
"draw" signal uses these APIs.
We've always sort-of supported people calling gdk_cairo_create
"outside" of a begin_paint / end_paint like old times, but then you're
not getting the benefit of double-buffering, and it's harder for GDK to
optimize.
Additionally, newer backends like Mir and Wayland can't actually support
this model, since they're based on double-buffering and swapping buffers
at various points in time. If we hand you a random cairo_t, we have no
idea when is a good time to swap.
Remove support for this.
This is technically a GDK API break: a warning is added in cases where
gdk_cairo_create is called outside of a paint cycle, and the returned
surface is a dummy that won't ever be composited back onto the main
surface. Testing with complex applications like Ardour didn't produce
any warnings.
Weston releases buffers almost immediately after they're done, which
means that GTK+ doesn't use a temporary surface and instead paints
directly onto the SHM backing store that Weston will use.
Normally, after painting to the temporary surface, GTK+ *replaces*
the existing backing surface with CAIRO_OPERATOR_SOURCE. However,
if we immediately paint to the backing surface, it might have junk
from the last paint in it. So clear out the backing surface whenever
somebody calls begin_paint_region().
Maybe we should just always use the temporary surface like the X11
codepath, since that prevents us from having to do weird things like
this, but oh well.
wl_surfaces can't switch roles, so destroying the xdg_surface but not
the wl_surface means that we could get an error when trying to re-map
the surface.
We could fix this by not destroying the xdg resource and only do it at
finalization time, but it's just as easy to just create a new wl_surface.
Since the xdg roles are a special case of the surface, some compositors
like Weston destroy them automatically when the wl_surface is destroyed.
Thus, we need to destroy these first.
The Wayland compositor is completely allowed to send us configure
events for the same size, and this validly happens if we're changing
states. Fizzle these out.
Weston numbers its touch sequences ids starting from 0, thus simply
setting the GtkEvents touch.sequence to the touch id value typically
causes gdk_event_get_event_sequence to return NULL. Unfortunately this
confuses other parts of GDK.
As both weston & mutter keep the sequence id between 0..max_dev_touches
-1 simply use + 1 to keep the id > 0. While this isn't entirely correct
(compositor could send -1 as the touch id), this keeps the touch id in
gtk tied to the touch id from weston which is useful for debugging. A
more thorough solution could be done when it turns out this is an issue
in practise
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731371
There are plans to add session-dependent defaults to GSettings
(based on the newly standardized XDG_CURRENT_DESKTOP); until
then, the WM uses a different schema for its button-layout
setting in classic mode. So for the time being, do the same
and pick the alternative schema when XDG_CURRENT_DESKTOP
indicates that we are in a classic session.
(It's not pretty, but hopefully won't be with us for too long ...)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731273
Pick up the setting from the org.gnome.desktop.wm.preferences schema
if available. It is slightly more involved than other settings, as
the actual button names used in the schema differ from the ones we
use, so we need an additional translation step.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731273
All the globals we care about should appear before doing anything
else, up-front, so a single round-trip after adding the registry
should be more than enough.
Since you can't take grabs on unmapped windows, GtkMenu takes a grab on
the menu in a convoluted way: it first grabs another window, shows the
menu window, and then transfers the grab over to the GtkMenu widget.
For normal menubars, this is perfectly fine, as the first window it grabs
is our toplevel, and that gets picked up in our transient path. For
GtkMenuButton or other spurious uses of gtk_menu_popup, it creates a new
temporary input-only window which it takes the grab on, known as the "grab
transfer window". Since this window isn't a transient-for of our new menu
widget window, the grab isn't noticed when we go to show it, and thus the
menu ends up as a new toplevel.
Add a special hack to GtkMenu and the Wayland backend which lets us notice
this "grab transfer window", and include it in our grab finding path.
It's sort of terrible to have to hack up the widgets instead of just the
backend, but the alternative would be an entirely new window type which is
managed correctly by GDK. I don't want to write that.
The events are routed through a new slave device with type
GDK_SOURCE_TOUCHSCREEN, minimal tracking of touches is done
to keep the state for each of those.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=728426
