The key repeat is stopped as soon as a key is pressed, so if the user
quickly presses a key while another is already pressed and being
repeated, key repeat gets cancelled:
- key1 press
- key1 repeat
- key2 press -> key1 repeat stopped
- key1 release
- key 2 is not repeated even though it's kept depressed
This is a different behavior from X11, which confuses migrating users.
To mimic the X11 behavior, keep track of the number of keys pressed
simultaneously and cancel key repeat only when none is pressed.
This way, if a user pressed a key while another one is being repeated,
the new key press can possibly be repeated as well.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778019
Elsewhere we already go through the keymap to get modifiers so we
should do the same here. In fact, this was relying on xkb modifier
mask values being bitwise compatible with GdkModifierType which isn't
necessarily true.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=770112
xdg_shell v6 allows grabless popups, whose behavior is not that
different from override redirect windows with no grab to take
keyboard input (and pointer events outside).
This means we can relax the requirement to have a grab before
creating an xdg_popup. The warning is still useful to have so
people stop relying on gdk_window_show();gdk_device_grab() being
an ok pattern to popup a window, it's been moved to wayland
implementation of gdk_device_grab() instead, so we warn if trying
to grab a GDK_WINDOW_TEMP window that's already visible.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771694
The wayland tablet protocol allows notifying the compositor with
descriptions of the actions performed by each tablet element. This
API call allows to hook up in to this wayland-specific feature.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=770026
These devices are kind of an strange case. Their "master" device is
the keyboard, because they share toplevel focus with it, regardless
of stylus focus. Nonetheless, they are only expected to send the
GdkEventPad* set of events.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=770026
This is a subclass of GdkWaylandDevice that implements GdkDevicePad,
all pad features are looked up from the info obtained through the
tablet v2 interface.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=770026
An xdg-popup requires a serial that the compositor will compare against
its own serial and will dismiss the popup if it doesn't match.
gtk+ uses either a pointer or touch serial for its helper function
_gdk_wayland_seat_get_last_implicit_grab_serial() but if the menu is
triggered before the user has had any pointer or touch interaction with
the client, using a keyboard shortcut, there is neither pointer nor
touch serial available, and gtk+ will use 0 as the default.
As a result, the compositor will instantly dismiss the xdg-popup. In
this case, gtk+ should use the keyboard serial instead.
Track keyboard serial as well and use the keyboard serial as the value
if there is no newer pointer or touch serial available.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=768017
Only update to using v2 headers/structs. The incompatible changes
to tool events are dealt with in the next commit. Pads aren't handled
in this commit either.
On X11, device_query_state() uses XIQueryPointer() which will return a
child window only if the pointer is within an actual child of the given
window.
Wayland backend would return the pointer->focus window independently of
the given window, but that breaks the logic in get_device_state() and
later in gdk_window_get_device_position_double() because the window is
searched based on coordinates from another window without sibling
relationship, breaking gtkmenu sub-menus further down the line.
Fix the Wayland backend to mimic X11's XIQueryPointer() to return a
child only if really a child of the given window.
That's the most sensible thing to do to fix the issue, but the API here
seems to be modeled after the X11 implementation and the description of
gdk_window_get_device_position_double() is not entirely accurate.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=768016
The Wayland protocol does not share XI2's wealth of information
about individual devices, but it does provide discriminating
information about the source for scroll events. Pass this on to
the application by creating separate slave devices for these,
and setting them as source device on the scroll events.
These devices can be discriminated by their input-source property:
wheel - GDK_SOURCE_MOUSE
finger - GDK_SOURCE_TOUCHPAD
continuous - GDK_SOURCE_TRACKPOINT
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=767093
fix up
Only generate crossing events on wl_touch.down for the virtual master
device used for touch events, and only whenever this virtual device
actually moves across surfaces. This behavior resembles better what is
expected in X11, where the pointer is warped to the touch position
on XITouchBegin.
This avoids the double emission of leave events when the pointer
emulating touch is lifted, that crossing event will be instead
generated when/if the focus surface changes.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766314
The wayland specification for discrete step information for scroll and
other axes reads:
| The discrete value carries the directional information. e.g. a
| value of -2 is two steps towards the negative direction of this axis.
mutter sets a value of 1 for SCROLL_DOWN events and -1 for SCROLL_UP
events.
gdkdevice Wayland backend does the opposite, it translates a positive
discrete value as SCROLL_UP and a negative value as SCROLL_DOWN, which
ends up inverting the scrolling direction.
Fix the logic in gdkdevice Wayland to use a positive value as
SCROLL_DOWN and a negative value as SCROLL_UP so that it matches mutter
and weston logic.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765907
NoSymbol is not a valid GDK symbol (it only has the concept of
VoidSymbol, for some reason, which is neither the same thing nor
produced by any sane keymap). Passing NoSymbol events through to GTK+
apps is unlikely to produce anything useful.
In particular, this meant VTE would scroll to the end of the buffer when
pressing Fn (required for Page Up/Down on Macs), as it was receiving a
keypress that wasn't a modifeir. This does not happen on X11, as the
KEY_FN keycode is above 255, so does not get sent to clients.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=764825
We don't care about the specific (possibly client-side) window that
requested the focus here, only the toplevel. Fixes mistakenly sent
focus events when the grab happens inside the current focus window.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762756
Always associate a drag context with a GdkDisplay and use that when
getting a cursor for a given action.
If we don't do this, dragging on a window that doesn't use the default
display will make us use cursors from the wrong display.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765565
The naming of pointers to GdkWaylandDisplay's were inconsistent.
Running the following commands in gtk+/gdk/wayland illustrate the
inconsistency:
$ grep -r '\<display_wayland\>' *.[ch] | wc -l
195
$ grep -r '\<wayland_display\>' *.[ch] | wc -l
81
This patch renames all occurrences of "wayland_display" to
"display_wayland". This is also consistent with naming in the X11
backend. A couple of whitespace changes were done as well in places
where the rename was already done, that added line breaks to long lines
that stood out.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765474
When synthesizing keyboard repeat, we can potentially drift further from
the mark depending on the timing of the frame callback and how long it
took to deliver the event.
This patch attempts to reduce this by tracking from a stable epoch the
time of our next keyboard repeat.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765567
Windows save in hardware_keycode an information which is not so low
level and some application require the hardware scancode.
As Windows provides this information save it in GdkEventPrivate
and provide a function to get this information.
For no Windows system the function return the hardware_keycode instead.
Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio <fziglio@redhat.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765259
If we get gdk_wayland_seat_flush_frame_event() with no previous event to be
flushed, we fallback into the scroll event checks. However, there's no check
performed there as to whether it really scrolled, so it'd always send a smooth
scroll event with 0/0 deltas in this case.
This should be mostly harmless, but still, we should only end up emitting scroll
events if those really happened.
The frame event is also meant to compress wl_pointer.leave events, at this
point the focus surface will be definitely NULL. In the end, wl_pointer.frame
should flush the last composed event despite the pointer focus.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765065
On wayland, such axes are per-tool, we must update device capabilities
on the fly as new tools enter proximity, first the slave device so
it matches the current tool, and then the master device so it looks
the same than the current slave device.
Only the management of tablets and tools is added so far. No tablet events
are yet interpreted.
As it's been the tradition in GTK+, erasers are split into their own device,
whereas the rest of the tools are meant to be routed through the
GDK_SOURCE_PEN device. Both pen/eraser devices are slaves to a master
pointer device, separate to wl_pointer's. This is so each tablet can
maintain its own cursor/positioning accounting.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Chandler Paul <thatslyude@gmail.com>
This will enable multiple "pointers" to have separate data here.
Will come out useful when adding support for tablets, as they
will have a separate cursor for all purposes.
Now that GdkWaylandDeviceData is gone, the functions prefixed
"gdk_wayland_device_" and taking a GdkWaylandSeat as first
parameter feel out of place. Renaming those makes it more obvious
that it's seat functions.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763859
It's the same than gdk_device_get_seat() nowadays. Also, rename the
usages of GdkWaylandDeviceData to GdkWaylandSeat in the functions
affected by the removal.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763859
