gtk_tree_view_column_unset_tree_view() resets column->priv->tree_view to
NULL.
The function is called when a column is removed, but later from the same
function we would call _gtk_tree_view_column_unrealize_button(), which
expects column->priv->tree_view to be != NULL, causing these critical
warnings
Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_widget_unregister_window: assertion
`GTK_IS_WIDGET (widget)' failed
This commit moves the call to unset the tree view after the button is
unrealized.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=695473
This was causing warnings on widget unparent like:
Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_window_has_native: assertion `GDK_IS_WINDOW (window)' failed
Becasue the window was not properly removed from the lists on unrealize.
This replaces the previously hardcoded calls to gdk_window_set_user_data,
and also lets us track which windows are a part of a widget. Old code
should continue working as is, but new features that require the
windows may not work perfectly.
We need this for the transparent widget support to work, as we need
to specially mark the windows of child widgets.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687842
Commit ddceddaa84 removed the call to
gtk_style_context_set_background() in favour of always rendering it with
gtk_render_background() during the draw vfunc.
This has the side effect of making the backing window always
transparent, which blocks GTK from applying some optimizations during
the paint cycle. The result is that, especially in clutter-gtk
applications, scrolling performance gets really bad.
This commit partially reverts ddceddaa84
and changes the code so that both gtk_style_context_set_background() and
gtk_render_background() are called
Since 16195ad the “expand” property is always set to FALSE when a
column is resized. This commit takes a different approach and enables
“expand” whenever the column is wide enough. An appropriate
“fixed-width” (so that the desired width is achieved after expanding) is
calculated using equations that are explained in the code.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691751
Rewrites gtk_tree_view_column_request_width() and
gtk_tree_view_size_allocate_columns() to respect the minimum and natural
sizes that are already being returned by
gtk_cell_area_context_get_preferred_width().
The convoluted logic explained (not!) by this comment has been removed:
“Only update the expand value if the width of the widget has changed, or
the number of expand columns has changed, or if there are no expand
columns, or if we didn't have an size-allocation yet after the last
validated node.” This logic seems to have been a workaround for the
“jumping” behavior fixed in 16195ad and is no longer necessary.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691751
Removes the hidden “resized-width” and “use-resized-width” properties
from GtkTreeViewColumn and instead uses the “fixed-width” property to
serve the same purpose. “fixed-width”, if set, will now override the
auto-sized width (-1 is now a legal value meaning “not set”).
Additional “cleanups” in this commit:
1. When the user resizes the column the “expand” property is now also
set to FALSE, in order to prevent the column from suddenly jumping to a
different width when the window is resized.
2. The code that translated mouse movement to column sizes has been
simplified:
the change in column width is now calculated directly from the distance
the mouse cursor has traveled. Weird behavior that might have happened
previously if the position of the column changed during resizing, is now
prevented.
3. There was some lengthy logic handling the keyboard shortcuts used to
resize treeview columns, which would call gtk_widget_error_bell() once
the minimum or maximum width was reached. Instead of rewriting these
checks I simply set the “fixed-width” property to what was requested,
relying on the fact that it is already clamped between the minimum and
maximum width during size allocation.
I will greatly surprised if anyone notices the missing error bell.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691751
Splits up size_request() so that the height calculations are only done
when get_preferred_height() is called and the width calculations are
only done when get_preferred_width() is called. Since
get_preferred_width() does not change the treeview->priv->width value,
treeview->priv->prev_width will always be equal to it and can therefore
be removed. The only place where prev_width was used is a block in
gtk_tree_view_size_allocate(). This block seems to be adjusting the
horizontal scrollbar to account for treeview->priv->width having been
changed in size_request() and should no longer be necessary. A similar
block immediately above it seems to already account for the width change
in size_allocate().
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691751
After “validation” (i.e., background size calculations) of some cells,
size_request() was called here to update the internally cached size of
the treeview. Apparently not updating the sizes leads to some kind of
“inconsistency” that messes with top_row_to_dy(). In the GTK3 model for
size allocation, things are more complicated. The treeview can’t just
go ahead and calculate its own size any more; instead it reports both a
“minimum” and a “natural” size, and it doesn’t know what size it will
actually get until size_allocate(). It may be necessary to update
top_row_to_dy() to deal with not knowing the exact size.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691751
This commit exposes the get_type() functions and standard
headers for accessible implementations. This makes it possible
to derive from the GTK accessible implementations without
GType magic tricks. This is necessary, because we require the
a11y type hierarchy to be parallel to the widget type hierarchy.
So, if you derive a widget and need to adjust its a11y implementation,
you have to be able to derive its accessible implementation.
This commit probably exposes more than is absolutely necessary,
it also exposes accessibles of widgets that are unlikely candidates
for deriving from.
We currently invalidate the whole tree every time the style state
changes in the tree view. The primary reason for this is to catch
default font changes as that may affect text cell renderers. But
cell renderers could *potentially* also read other style properties
(although that seems weird and unlikely).
We handle this by invalidating only when some state that affects sizes
is changed. This includes all the font properties.
Render a background with gtk_render_background() in draw() instead.
Note that we still use gtk_style_context_set_background() for the header
window.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=688744
Currently the GdkWindow used for dragging is created once when
the first drag starts, and the reused identical each time.
Instead, just recreate it for each drag, with the correct size.
Deprecate public API where appropriate and make it no-ops.
Remove all calls to it.
Get rid of the 'transition' css property.
For now, this means spinners don't animate anymore.
Style properties should not be cached, they should be queried live.
Also, this fixes the case where the expander size wasn't set when
constructing the widget which caused expanders to go missing.
This can cause lagging when scrolling as it causes us to repaint
on every scroll event. This wasn't historically a great problem,
but with smooth scrolling we get a lot more events, so this
now creates visible lagging on slower machines.
Don't handle mouse button events greater than 5 so
they can bubble up to be used by the application.
This was causing nautilus list view to not go forward
and backwards when pressing the extra mouse buttons
designated for that.
Fixes bug 673441
Signed-off-by: Nelson Benitez Leon <nbenitezl@gmail.com>
Since we check for !list->next (and !list->prev for RTL) to set the
GTK_REGION_LAST flag, we have to filter out invisible columns before
looping; if we don't do that we might end up assigning GTK_REGION_LAST
to an invisible column.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=672937
In particular gtksettings.h and gtkstylecontext.h needed to be included
in lots of places now.
Also, I order the includes alphabetically in a bunch of headers.
The widget window is usually covered by the bin_window.
Its background color will become relevant when we introduce
kinetic scrolling with overshooting.
There's no reason this should be a focus ring rather than an actual
frame. In the past this was probably used to get a dashed effect, but
now we even support that natively for borders.
