Instead of having old and new style, now have a GtkCssStyleChange opaque
object that will compute the changes you are interested in for you.
This simplifies change signal handlers quite a bit and avoids lots of
repeated computation in every signal handler.
Since we're no longer doing geometry widgets, don't send
base size and increments to the window manager anymore either.
This avoids an ugly 2 pixel gap to the right and bottom of half-tiled
terminals under gnome-shell.
Applying the client-side decorations in the configure routine greatly
increases the chances of having the right size for the GtkHEaderBar and
border shadows.
Yet, it may be possible that these sizes change at a later point in
time, if for example the GtkHeaderBar grows in height while adding new
controls.
Mention this possible pitfall in the documentation for
gtk_window_resize().
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=756618
Just like we did for the default size, that reduces the chances of
having the headerbar missing or wrongly sized when computing the client
side decorations controls.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=756618
It seems this branch is not needed anymore. It was originally added in
1999 to support gtk_widget_realize(), but all those reasons seem
obsolete today.
Instead just call gtk_widget_realize().
If you end up at this commit when bisecting:
There is no bug that made me remove this code, it was purely meant to be
cleanup / dead code removal. I seem to have introduced a new bug or
bisecting wouldn't have let you here. So it seems we should just revert
this commit.
Widgets such as gtkfilechooser may be saving their size and position on
the unmap callback, if the client-side decoration header bar is removed
first, the reported size will be wrong.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=756618
Fix a regression introduced by:
commit 6866d1c widget: Make gtk_widget_queue_allocate() not resize
Where the dropdown menu in Firefox would not be relocated after the
toplevel window is moved.
bugzilla: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758609
Just like it happens for window dragging, we're likely to not see the
matching button release for this event, so we must reset the controller
manually here.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758661
Before calling gdk_window_move_resize(), store the full configure
request, not just width and height.
Fixes firefox randomly losing position of its dropdown windows.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758609
Before the resulting window size would differ if the default size was set
before adding a headerbar vs after. Now the saved state is again the actual
requested size and it is adjusted at the time we request a window size.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=756618
GtkHeaderBar will not show the maximize button if the window in not of
type normal or not resizeable.
Use the same restriction for double-click actions as well.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757530
An application may use gtk_window_get_size() to retrieve the current
window size and later reuse that size with
gtk_window_set_default_size().
gtk_window_set_default_size() and gtk_window_get_default_size() should
also take client side decorations offset into account.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=756618
Getting the shadow width must not call gtk_style_context_set_state()
because that will invalidate the node and cause a style-updated emission
which can cause gtk_widget_queue_resize() calls.
And calling queue_resize() from get_preferred_size() essentially means
the size is permanently invalid because you invalidate it while
querying it.
This causes flickering of windows when going from/to backdrop state. To
avoid this we either need to fix the theme to not have different shadow
sizes in those cases or we need to ensure the window doesn't flicker in
the first place.
At the time gtk_window_move() or gtk_window_resize() get called, there
is no way to predict if a popup window will actually draw its shadow, so
applying an offset in this case may end up with a wrong size or
positioning for such windows.
Changing the logic in gtk_window_should_use_csd() as previously done to
address that issue will cause some other breakage as popup windows may
not draw a shadow but still need CSD.
So best is to actually apply client side decorations offset for regular,
top level windows only. This is actually a lot simpler and safer and
less likely to cause additional breakage.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=756618
git commit a5b1cdd0 introduced a regression where CSD windows are not
resizable with metacity.
Reason being that metacity does not support "_GTK_FRAME_EXTENTS" and
therefore gtk_window_supports_client_shadow() would always return FALSE.
This explains why it works with window managers which support
"_GTK_FRAME_EXTENTS" such as mutter/gnome-shell or xfwm4.
Partially revert commit a5b1cdd0 to reinstate the logic in
get_shadow_width().
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757805
The list of popovers will specify the stacking order, a
_gtk_window_raise_popover() private call has been added so popover
widgets can request being on top.
Also, the stacking on popovers is ensured on gtk_window_size_allocate(),
after the size/stacking changes on the child widget have finished, this
will ensure popovers are kept on top of window contents.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=756670
Previous commit 305b34a "GtkWindow: fix move/get position with CSD"
introduced a regression because some windows presumably use shadows but
actually don't, resulting in a negative offset being wrongly applied.
Problem is that get_shadow_width() would return non-zero shadows even
for windows that have no shadow, thus causing the negative offset.
Fix the logic in get_shadow_width() and gtk_window_should_use_csd() so
that get_shadow_width() returns accurate values.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=756618
This commit toggles the big switch. We now don't run size_allocate()
from the toplevel up anymore in cases where we don't need to.
Things might be broken in subtle ways as a result of this commit. We'll
have to find them and fix them.
Widgets that already have a resize queued don't need to walk the whole
parent chain and queue another resize. It's enough to do it once per
resize.
This also means that sizegroups cannot use the shortcut of just
invalidating the first widget in the group anymore. That widget might
already have a resize queued while others don't.
Ignore the geometry widget passed to gtk_window_set_geometry_hints().
Usind the widget itself was a hack that complicates the size request
machinery.
It is also incorrect in that it doesn't respect height-for-width.
Last but not least, it was only used by gnome-terminal and that
application can easily work without it.
Take into account and compensate for the size of the client side
decorations widgets in gtk_window_move() and gtk_window_get_pos()
including gravity.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=756618
When client side decoration is used, the size passed to
gtk_window_resize() or retrieved from gtk_window_get_size() for top-
level windows also accounts for the client side decorations widgets
such as the title bar or the shadow borders.
Add up the size of these additional controls to the given size to get
the size expected.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=756618
If a window is decorated, we need to draw the frame and shadow, even if
it is app-paintable - it's just nonsense to have a frame that we handle
events on, but expect the app to paint it. (We paint the titlebar in
any case.) If a client wants to handle all painting, it should use an
undecorated window.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=756886
Make it what it is - the enum - so that that it is sure that the hint
will fit in the field. Without this, any hint that doesn't fit in 3
bits will be truncated to the 3 least significant bits, causing
unexpected behaviour.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=756496
Once a window is maximized/fullscreen, resize increments should be
ignored otherwise the window may appear smaller than the screen size.
That also applies to configure requests as well.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751368
Check whether the given popover even changed size in
_gtk_window_set_popover_position. If not, just move its GdkWindow
without calling gtk_widget_queue_resize. Using popover_get_rect here is
still relatively costly, but popover_size_allocate would be doing that
anyway.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=755435
To GtkGesture machinery, if an event triggers a controller/gesture signal,
and gesture reset/cancellation as a result, the event has been managed
after all.
Commit e3bd895667 effectively changed the return value of the
wrapping gtk_event_controller_handle_event() function, which broke some
paths (eg. gtk_popover_button_press() wouldn't while the GTK+ grab was
active for this reason because the button press event was consumed early
on gtk_window_check_handle_wm_event()).
That patch is not too off-track given potential child widgets' behavior,
we want nonetheless to distinguish the denied vs cancelled paths here
(because GtkWindow itself relies on the GtkGesture behavior described in
the first paragraph on the begin_move/resize paths), so just reset
gestures after the event has already gone through the GtkEventController
so the return value is unaffected.
Traditionally a sequence is set to GTK_EVENT_SEQUENCE_DENIED state when
it is to be ignored, which means it is dormant, but still managed by the
gesture (accounting, "denied" sequences still make "slots" in multitouch
gesture busy, etc...).
This gesture will run for all button presses and releases in the window
though when presses happen on the "window content" region, and we can't
account for every children to be as educated as setting the proper mask
on every window, or ensuring events will be propagated as they should.
In order to cater for this, just reset the gestures, we can live without
such accounting in these specific GtkGestureSingle gestures.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=754098
This reverts commit 3eacfa88f2.
Apart from the patch not being correct, we don't want to expose private
structures in header files if we can avoid it.
And this type-checking overhead is not an optimization that is even
measurable.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=754932
Instead of queueing a new idle handler every time we call
gtk_window_update_debugging(), only queue one if none is queued that.
Saves a lot of work, in particular when templates create context menus
for every row in a large listbox as in the gtk-demo listbox example.
This ensures that windows appear in the inspectors tree when
they are created, and it prevents GTK_DEBUG=interactive from
coming up with an empty object tree.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=752664
The previous fix was falling into the crack between
realized and mapped - we would apply the state when a window
is just realized, then unset the _initially flag, and then
when the window gets mapped, we'd undo the state. To fix
this, go back to the way things were when these flags were
first introduced.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=752765
Go back to use these variables only for pre-mapped state changes.
Their use got muddied over the years, and it was hard to keep track
of what is acutal state, and what just a queued request.
1. This confuses the code as it's using the old type hint with the new
type hint on GDK window creation
2. It only existed as a workaround for old code that directly accessed
window->type_hint which hasn't been possible since 3.0.
This behavior has been made optional on add_popover() time, text handles
will keep being able to overflow the window, in order to allow text
selection on views too close to the window edge.
Regular GtkPopovers are reinstaurated to the previous size positioning
logic though, that is, limited by the visible area of the window.
Under Wayland, fullscreen/maximized windows may not cover the entire
area when a size increment is specified.
Ignore size increments for fullscreen/maximized windows just like most
window managers do under X11 so that windows with size increments can
still be fullscreen or fully maximized under Wayland as well.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751368
Since 740bcf5, we use these properties to properly compute shadow widths
for unmapped windows. If a client calls gtk_window_maximize and a window
manager unmaximizes a window, we should draw borders, so we need to
reset these when we get the property notification.
This queues an unnecessary resize on the toplevel, and is not needed
anymore, now that GtkWidget does not call
gtk_style_context_set_background() on the window's GdkWindow anymore.
The WM isn't aware of O-R (popup) or offscreen windows. If somebody
maps an offscreen or a popup GTK+ window before the main window, we'll
complete the sequence before a "real" window is mapped. Make sure to
ignore these for startup notifies.
Don't add the container border to the title request size; it
is only used for the child widget.
Don't call gtk_widget_get_preferred_width_for_height() for
the title bar with an unrelated height and subtract the title
bar height before querying the child widget width.
Guard against negative size requests after substracting the
borders/shadows and the title bar.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751341
In the non-CSD case we checked for 0x0 window size requisition
and replaced it with 200x200 so the window was still visible.
This no longer works in case of CSD as the shadow and title bar
are always added to the requisition resulting in a titlebar/shadow
only window in case there is no child widget (this is currently
visible under wayland or when setting GTK_CSD=1).
Instead of special casing the final window size, special case
the child requisition paths instead. This gives us the same
requisition in both, CSD and non-CSD cases (the header bar
has a too large minimum width atm so the resulting window is
still not the same)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751341
This error resulted in warnings like
"pixman_region32_init_rect: Invalid rectangle passed"
In case the window is smaller than handle_size * 2 the resulting
edge window got a negative size. Prevent that by limiting the
handle size to half the respective edge length. This also
prevents the corner windows from overlapping in case the window
is too small.
The old should_use_csd() function would return FALSE if the GTK_CSD
environment variable is unset; the change in commit c5e5ee6749
made it return TRUE if GTK_CSD is unset. This has a cascade effect
on the window size, which causes invalid rectangles to bubble down
to Pixman.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751140
This will be the widget that the popover relates to (::pointing-to in
GtkPopover, ::parent in GtkTextHandle).
Additional API to check the popover/parent relationship between widgets
has been added, which will be useful wherever this is necessary in a
generic manner.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=750993
The change in 03213b9509 changed the rules
as to when CSD can be enabled, but it also unconditionally enables CSD
with the implicit assumption that client-side shadows were the real
issue, and that we could work around that by drawing our own borders.
This also means that setting a titlebar for a GtkWindow will enable CSD
unconditionally.
In reality, some window managers (like Matchbox) *only* support
server-side decorations, and will ignore all hints to the contrary, to
the point of drawing decorations at random locations on top of the
window.
Since CSD are enabled unconditionally, the GTK_CSD environment variable
is also not a suitable escape hatch.
In the grand tradition of asking ourselves if we should do something
just because we can, we should split the environment checks from the
checks on what the user requested; by doing that, we can also check
when enabling client-side decorations, and ideally bail out if needed.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=750343
Even if a window doesn't support client side shadow
(gtk_window_supports_client_shadow returns FALSE), don't assume the
shadow width is zero, as CSD may have been enabled anyway (meaning
priv->client_decorated is TRUE). In that case we still need to report
the correct width.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=749451
If CSD is enabled with shadow even though it "shouldn't"*, the width
should still be calculated correctly. This fixes a regression caused by
b1e5ad469c.
* gtk_window_should_use_csd () returns false
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=748615
The window state 'client_decorated' will only be set the window is being
realized. If anyone tries to get the shadow size before that it'd get
the with as if there always was no shadow.
This avoids negative sized opaque regions caused by the allocation being
smaller than shadow.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=748615
Requires Vista and newer.
* Create surfaces with cairo_win32_surface_create_with_format
* Provide an rgba visual that can be distinguished from the system visual
* Make rgba visual the best available visual
* Enable alpha-transparency for all windows that we control
* Check for appropriate cairo capabilities at configure time
(W32 - 1.14.3 newer than 2015-04-14; others - 1.14.0)
* Check for composition support before enabling CSDs
* Re-enable transparency on WM_DWMCOMPOSITIONCHANGED
Windows that were created while composition was enabled and that were CSDed
as a result and will look ugly (thick black borders or no borders at all) once
composition is disabled.
If composition is enabled afterwards, they will return back to normal.
This happens, for example, when RDP session is opened to a desktop where a GTK
application is running. For W7/Vista windows will only re-gain transparency after
the RDP session is closed. For W8 transparency will only be gone momentarily.
Windows that were created while composition was disabled will not be CSDed
automatically and will use SSD (WM decorations), while windows that are CSDed
manually will get a thin square border.
If composition is enabled afterwards, these windows will not change.
This is most noticeable for system menus (popup menus are often generated
on the fly, system menus are created once) and some dialogues (About dialogue,
for example).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=727316
Instead of issuing g_warning, fill the provided GError.
This lets us test this error handling, and is the right
thing to do. Use the new GtkBuilder helpers and
g_markup_collect_attributes to do so.
