This adds both a compile time check for the SDK version being
compiled against, as well as a runtime check in the case the
resulting binary is run against an older SDK.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=735054
Add some docs/example about the possible event handling ordering issues
that may appear on GtkGesture::begin between multiple gesture groups.
Mostly relevant for state changes.
The remaining code assumes that the dialog doesn't get destroyed, but
it actually does on delete-event.
In particular, the filter function and the preview text are lost as
soon as the dialog is created and thus when we create a new dialog we
don't have those properties to set on it anymore.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=719936
Factor out the typename-to-get-type mangling as a separate
function, for easier testing.
Also fix some cases where it doesn't, currently, like
GString -> g_string_get_type and
GdkRGB -> gdk_rgb_get_type
The scale in the selectable listbox in page 2 of gtk3-widget-factory
has the flaw that the row is getting selected even when one only
interacts with the scale - unlike e.g. the checkbutton and button
further down in the listbox.
The problem is that GtkRange is trying to claim the sequence for
the drag gesture from the ::pressed handler of a multipress
gesture. Since the drag gesture hasn't seen the sequence at this
point, that is ineffective.
The fix here is to rearrange the gestures so that the multipress
gesture sees the sequence before the drag gesture, and then
claim the sequence from the ::drag-begin handler.
Binding signals can return a boolean indicating whether they
handled the event. Use that here and return FALSE if the
inspector keybinding is disabled.
When closing the inspector before the main window, we must take
care to sever all signal connections and weak refs, otherwise
things will go bad when the window is closed later.
When GtkGestureMultiPress::released happens, in_button should be unset
after emitting GtkButton::released, whose default implementation uses it.
Moreover, in_button should only be unset there for real touch events, not
guaranteed to trigger crossing events, as opposed to every pointer/touch
events from touchscreens.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=737297
Instead of hardcoding these actions, consult the settings.
Note that not all of the actions supported by gnome-shell are
implemented here, only maximize, minimize, lower, and menu.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=729782
These match the GSettings that mutter/metacity/gnome-shell have
for this. We change the default for the middle-click action to
none, since lower is just a terrible default.
We're slightly bending the rules here, since we're adding new
settings after .0, but a) it is just barely after .0, and b) settings
are not really application API.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=729782
Some recent refactoring changed things so that in_button is no
longer TRUE when released() is called for touch events. As a minimal
fix, let GtkButton do more of the work by chaining up to its
pressed and released handlers, which know how to handle touch
events. This could be further improved by leaving more of the
state handling to GtkButton, like it was done for GtkToggleButton.
A popover can go unmanaged for 2 reasons, when the widget it points to
gets destroyed, or transitionally in gtk_popover_set_relative_to(). In
both of these cases it makes sense to only unset popover information
about the previous widget managing it, if the popover is meant to
survive the unmanaging through extra refs.
Also, the focus widget prior to a modal popover being shown is considered
information about the relative_to widget, unset it on
gtk_popover_update_relative_to() with the rest.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736193
This gives an opportunity for implementations to handle these events
differently, instead of hardcoding the WM-triggering behavior.
gtk_window_event() only forwards events for WM management if the event
widget is not the window (ie. caught when bubbling), so is safe to be
called here without triggering gtk_window_handle_wm_event() twice.
This commit is an adaption to master of
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736702#c1 by Cosimo Cecchi.
On regular scrolling (ie. not natural scrolling), positive deltas in the
Y axis (downwards) should actually move the value towards the adjustment
minimum value to be more intuitive. This also makes the scrolling
directions match between the button and the popped up scale.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736830
Settings have a little more metadata than plain properties. They
can come from different sources. Make this information available
so we can show it in the inspector.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736971
For symbolic icons, we prefer symbolics in inherited themes over
generic icons in the theme itself. So far this was implemented
by looking at icon_name[0] and looking that up in inherited themes
if it is symbolic. But with automatic rtl/ltr handling, the first
icon name will always have an -rtl or -ltr suffix, and an icon
with that suffix is not going to exist in most cases. To fix this,
look for shorter icon names too, as long as they are still symbolic.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=737000
Otherwise, they might not be properly set before the window is mapped.
For the opaque region and border window, it means that they won't get
set before the next size allocation, which tends to not be a bit deal.
For the shadow width, though, _GTK_FRAME_EXTENTS has a different meaning
when it's set before the window is mapped, so we need to make sure that
it's properly set when the window is mapped.
