The gtk_window_set_buildable_property implementation
was only used to set the unused builder_visible flag.
Remove both the flag and the vfunc.
This means we no longer have any set_buildable_property
implementations and could eventually drop that vfunc and
the support for it in GtkBuilder.
Remove a boatload of "or %NULL" from nullable parameters
and return values. gi-docgen generates suitable text from
the annotation that we don't need to duplicate.
This adds a few missing nullable annotations too.
We iterate here from the target widget up the toplevel checking
for the previous and new grab, there's however 2 bugs here:
- The check for is_shadowed was different to the check for was_shadowed
- The loop started with the assumption that the widgets did not hold
a grab, just to change it if the grab widget was found. (or maybe
it's the other way around? it's unclear with the differing checks
for past/present state).
Make these checks consistent, and ensure we start with the right
assumption for the past/present grabbing state, and accounting that
new/old grab widgets may or may not be part of the pick stack.
With gtk_grab_notify_foreach() just taking care of emitting crossing
notifications due to the GTK grab change, rename it to a more apt
gtk_synthesize_grab_crossing().
The _gtk_widget_grab_notify() function just (maybe) did a) reset
controllers and b) hide toplevels. The second part was a testing
remnant introduced in commit 024d832d94, not part of the original
fix.
Do the former more concisely, called from the place where we figure
out whether a widget's ability to receive events changed due to
GTK grabs. It's across those changes that we are interested in
resetting the controllers.
With the gestures being reset both ways, GtkWindowHandle (and
probably other) gestures are now able to reset after a GTK grab
takes input away (e.g. GtkMenuButton). This could be seen as
a sudden jump the next time they'd be dragged with the mouse,
as the gesture would "resume" the previous interaction.
Fixes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/issues/3942
Just from reading the code, it seems that we
should unset .csd and .solid-csd at the same
time, since the are mutually exclusive and
we unset them here so realize() can set one
of them again.
The code in gtkwindow.c for dealing with the various
combinations of client-side decorations and client-side
shadows is entirely too complicated.
This commit does not really clean it up, but simplifies
one of the shadow conditions far enough to make some
sense.
With this change, I get the expected decorations in
all the cases I can easily reproduce locally.
Deriving the resize border size from the shadows
carries the risk that we might end up with uneven
resize borders (or none at all, on some sides).
So, justs enforce that we have a big enough shadow
width on all sides.
The invisible resize borders have been wider than they
should, for a while. Go back to a size close to what
we have in GTK3.
To summarize: resize borders will be at most 12 pixels
on each size, but never wider than the windows shadow.
The resize corners have 'legs' of 24 pixels where you
still get a corner resize cursor.
Fixes: #3856
Orca ignores events unless the object is inside an object
with role window and states ACTIVE and SHOWING. To arrange
for this, introduce a new ACTIVE platform state, and set it
for windows when they are active.
This gets orca to be a lot more talkative.
In commit 4a76abffd4, we deferred unsetting focus
and default until after the next draw, overlooking the
case where the focus is set to another widget before we
ever get to the unsetting.
Fixes: #3413
Commit 3dbf5038fa tried to defer focus changes
until after rendering is done. But it failed to do so, since
the toplevel ::render handler is still before rendering of
popups that are attached to that toplevel. To do this
properly, we need to do it in the AFTER_PAINT frame clock
phase.
Fixes: #3725
Make _gtk_window_unset_focus_and_default queue the changes
for after the next draw. This achieves two things: first,
it avoids invalidating css at the wrong time (e.g. when
setting child-visible during size-allocation), and second,
it defers the focus change until after the widget is
hidden, so that moving the focus has the desired effect
of picking a different, visible widget.
Fixes: #3623
We only realize the ATContext on the top level, which will create an
GtkAtSpiRoot object and the corresponding GtkAtSpiCache object. Whenever
an AT connects to the accessibility bus, and asks for the various
objects, all the ATContext will be realized on demand.
When being fullscreen, and wanting to unfullscreen but not caring about
whether to go unmaximized or maximized (as this information is lost), if
the GdkToplevelLayout represents the full intended state, we won't be
able to do the right thing.
To avoid this issue, make the GdkToplevelLayout API intend based, where
if one e.g. doesn't call gdk_toplevel_set_maximized() with anything, the
backend will not attempt to change the maximized state.
This means we can also remove the old 'initially_maximized' and
'initially_fullscreen' fields from the private GtkWindow struct, as we
only deal with intents now.
When deciding whether to call gdk_toplevel_present(), check the
mappedness of GtkWidget instead of the mapped-ness of GdkSurface, as the
latter is mapped asynchronously, while the former is direct state of the
GtkWindow itself.
This fixes an issue where calling e.g. gtk_window_maximize() shortly
after showing it didn't take effect, as hadn't been mapped yet. While
maximizing after showing is racy, and will likely glitch from time to
time, the correct thing to do is still to maximize and handle whatever
state the compositor configured the window to be in.
Closes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/issues/3466
These ended up square in the various refactors. Make them again L-shaped
by extending these along the edge being checked. This means we have to
check for corner positions in all edges, though.
Having a property with the same name of a method makes some languages
which put properties and method names in the same flat namespace not
really happy about our choices. To avoid collisions, let's put the the
"fullscreen" property into the past, alongside the "maximized" property.
Drop the "don't write code that crashes" folksy bit; don't start
sentences with conjunctions; remove copy-pasted references to
"iconified" states; point to the corresponding property notification in
a consistent manner.
It was used by all surfaces to track 'is-mapped', but still part of the
GdkToplevelState, and is now replaced with a separate boolean in the
GdkSurface structure.
It also caused issues when a widget was unmapped, and due to that
unmapped a popover which hid its corresponding surface. When this
surface was hidden, it emitted a state change event, which would then go
back into GTK and queue a resize on popover widget, which would travel
back down to the widget that was originally unmapped, causing confusino
when doing future allocations.
To summarize, one should not hide widgets during allocation, and to
avoid this, make this new is-mapped boolean asynchronous when hiding a
surface, meaning the notification event for the changed mapped state
will be emitted in an idle callback. This avoids the above described
reentry issue.
