Try to do a better job of keeping example content
from being too wide. It is often rendered as <pre>
text so the only time we can wrap it is in the source.
It is best to full break lines at all punctuation and
to try to keep the width under 70 chars or so.
This makes it possible to move/resize client-side decorated windows that are
otherwise obscured by a GTK+ grab somewhere else, either a popover within the
window itself or a modal dialog above the window.
We now consider non-native windows non-opaque, which means any invalid
area in a subwindow will also be invalid all the way up to the nearest
native windows. We take advantage of this by ignoring all expose events
on non-native windows (which typically means just the toplevel) and instead
propagating down the draw() calls to children directly via
gtk_container_propagate_draw.
This is nice as it means we always draw widgets the same way, and it
will let us do some interesting ways in the future.
We also clean up the GtkWidget opacity handling as we can now always
rely on the draing happening via cairo.
We can't really just draw by walking down the widget hierarchy, as
this doesn't get the clipping right (so e.g. widgets doing cairo_paint
may draw outside the expected gdkwindow subarea) nor does it let
us paint window backgrounds.
So, we now do multiple draws for each widget, once for each GdkWindow,
although we still do it on the same base cairo_t that we get for the
toplevel native window. The difference is only the clipping, the rendering
order, and which other widgets we propagate into.
We also collect all the windows of a widget so we can expose them inside
the same opacity group if needed.
NOTE: This change neuters gtk_widget_set_double_buffered for
widgets without native windows. Its impossible to disable
the double buffering in this model.
Some utilities such as GIR and gtk-doc, initialize class vtables without
initializing GTK+, with composite templates accessing resources this
causes a hand full of unneeded warnings.
The workaround for now is the use a private function _gtk_ensure_resources()
which is both called while initializing GTK+, and at the beginning of
gtk_widget_class_set_template_from_resource() (the private function
ensures that the resource will only ever be registered GOnce).
Don't mention "auto mnemonics", since those methods are purely about
scheduling a delayed display, and that makes understanding the code a
bit harder.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=697144
When event capturing is enabled, stop propagating scroll events
at insensitive widgets, but don't handle them (don't return TRUE),
so they can bubble up again and reach their handling widgets.
I'll add a bunch of fixes for gcc complaining about
-Wmissing-declarations after finding a bunch of cases today where I had
forgotten to make functions static in the CSS code.
A thorn in those patches is G_DEFINE_TYPE() which doesn't allow making
the get_type() function static, so I added definitions for that function
above the G_DEFINE_TYPE().
After those patches, GTK should compile without warnings when this flag
is enabled.
Showing mnemonics immediately on modifier press can be annoying and
distracting when the user is just trying to Alt+Tab into another
application/window since the mnemonic will show up and quickly vanish
again when we receive the focus out event.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=672431
See inline comments for what it does. Its main use is figuring out if
something has been caused by GTK's caching of CSS properties or if it's
a different problem.
If the touch sequence happens on a window with GDK_TOUCH_MASK set,
a GdkTouchGrabInfo is created to back it up. Else a device grab is
only created if the sequence emulates the pointer.
If both a device and a touch grab are present on a window, the later
of them both is obeyed, Any grab on the device happening after a
touch grab generates grab-broken on all the windows an implicit
touch grab was going on.
This patch adds a capture phase to GTK+'s event propagation
model. Events are first propagated from the toplevel (or the
grab widget, if a grab is in place) down to the target widget
and then back up. The second phase is using the existing
::event signal, the new capture phase is using a private
API instead of a public signal for now.
This mechanism can be used in many places where we currently
have to prevent child widgets from getting events by putting
an input-only window over them. It will also be used to implement
kinetic scrolling in subsequent patches.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=641836
We automatically request more motion events in behalf of
the original widget if it listens to motion hints. So
the capturing widget doesn't need to handle such
implementation details.
We are not making event capture part of the public API for 3.4,
which is why there is no ::captured-event signal.
