Instead of having old and new style, now have a GtkCssStyleChange opaque
object that will compute the changes you are interested in for you.
This simplifies change signal handlers quite a bit and avoids lots of
repeated computation in every signal handler.
Having these extra spaces in the accel string is a bit awkward,
since they will be included in text decorations such as underlines.
Removing them has no visible effect.
Remove checks for NULL before g_free() and g_clear_object().
Merge check for NULL, freeing of pointer and its setting
to NULL by g_clear_pointer().
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733157
With the following code:
#define INVALID_CHAR GDK_KEY_VoidSymbol - 1
gtk_accelerator_get_label (INVALID_CHAR, GDK_SHIFT_MASK | GDK_CONTROL_MASK);
we would get this label:
Shift+Ctrl+
instead of this label:
Shift+Ctrl
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=694075
In the event that a GtkAccelKey was present for the closure but it
contained a keyval of 0 the previous code would show "". After the
recent adjustments, "-/-" would be shown in this case.
It turns out to be a pretty common case, so fix the logic to stop using
'0' as a magic value to mean "don't have an accel" and add a separate
boolean for that purpose.
Add an API to GtkAccelLabel for hardcoding the accel key to be displayed
(ie: allowing us to bypass the GtkAccelGroup lookup).
Use that from the GMenuModel-based GtkMenu construction code instead of
passing around the accel group.
This makes accel labels work in bloatpad again.
This patch effectively removes any hope of automatic runtime accel
changes in GMenuModel-based menus without additional application
support but it leaves the door open for this to be supported again in
the future (if we decide that it's important).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683738
This was an oversight in the recent accel label improvement.
When we get an untranslated string back from gettext(), it is
not ok to replace '_' by ' ' in-place. Instead, do it while
appending to the GString.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=641912
It doesn't make sense to keep them separate as GtkSizeRequest requires a
GtkWidget and GtkWidget implements GtkSizeRequest, so you can never have
one without the other.
It also makes the code a lot easier because no casts are required when
calling functions.
Also, the names would translate to gtk_widget_get_width() and people
agreed that this would be a too generic name, so a "preferred" was added
to the names.
So this patch moves the functions:
gtk_size_request_get_request_mode() => gtk_widget_get_request_mode()
gtk_size_request_get_width() => gtk_widget_get_preferred_width()
gtk_size_request_get_height() => gtk_widget_get_preferred_height()
gtk_size_request_get_size() => gtk_widget_get_preferred_size()
gtk_size_request_get_width_for_height() =>
gtk_widget_get_preferred_width_for_height()
gtk_size_request_get_height_for_width() =>
gtk_widget_get_preferred_height_for_width()
... and moves the corresponding vfuncs to the GtkWidgetClass.
The patch also renames the implementations of the vfuncs in widgets to
include the word "preferrred".
