This reverts commit 367e021652.
This causes criticals in e.g. the Text View: Multiple Buffers demo.
More work is required to get a fix for Bug 778853 that does not cause
anything else to regress.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778853
The fact that it doesn’t reuse the existing GtkLabel if present is not
immediately obvious to users (or is it just me?), so clarify that the
pre-existing :label-widget, if any, is always removed and replaced.
Commit 0c20604932 changed the theme to expect the .flat class on
the frame node rather than the border one, but didn't update the
code that applies the style according to the :shadow-type property.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=779005
POLICY_AUTOMATIC means scrollbars are only shown when needed, i.e. when
the size of the window is not large enough to show the entire child. So
when measuring the preferred size, such scrollbars should be ignored.
But measure() was adding size for bars for which policy_may_be_visible()
was TRUE, which it returns for POLICY_ALWAYS (good) & _AUTOMATIC (bad).
So we reserved space for child plus scrollbars, & because we have enough
space for the child, POLICY_AUTOMATIC hides the scrollbar, leaving the
extra reserved space empty at the right/bottom sides of the child. This
is very noticeable/inconvenient for non-overlay, automatic scrollbars.
Fix this by only requesting size for scrollbars that use POLICY_ALWAYS,
rather than basing the decision on policy_may_be_visible().
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778853
Using Ctrl + left/right to skip between words, or left/right to cancel a
selection, were causing movement on the screen in the opposite direction
of the glyph on the key. This was surprising and awful UX for RTL users.
This is based on a patch covering the former case by:
Author: Mehdi Sadeghi <mehdi@mehdix.org>
Date: Sat Feb 18 02:16:00 2017 +0000
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136059
Using Ctrl + left/right to skip between words, or left/right to cancel a
selection, were causing movement on the screen in the opposite direction
of the glyph on the key. This was surprising and awful UX for RTL users.
This is based on a patch covering the former case by:
Author: Ori Avtalion <ori@avtalion.name>
Date: Tue Apr 20 08:06:23 2010 +0000
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136059
The docs say that this class should be put on the frame node, and that’s
all we can do from C code, but the CSS was selecting on the border node.
The result was that adding .flat did not disable the border as expected.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778905
It was "Missing name of pseudo-class", but the real problem is exactly
the opposite: we /have/ been given a name, but it is not a valid one.
Change it to "Invalid name of pseudo-class" to minimise confusion.
gtk_text_iter_backward_line() checks the value of
real->line_char_offset without previously calling
ensure_char_offsets (real) to make sure the former
is up-to-date.
As a consequence of this, when gtk_text_iter_backward_line()
is called after a gtk_text_buffer_insert_range() in the
first line of buffer, the iter is not moved to the start of
the line, and the return value is wrong.
Fixed by adding the ensure_char_offsets() call.
A test case for this bug is added to the textiter gtk testsuite.
When a widget is created, its default scale is the scale of the
primary screen (for instance 2). But once parented to another widget
its scale factor should be the one of its parent (if parented to a
widget on a screen at scale factor 1, it should be 1).
The problem is that we don't emit the notify::scale-factor signal when
reparenting happens.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=776821
gtk_show_uri_on_window() will pass enough information for Portal helpers
to allow dialogue parenting in Flatpak, gtk_show_uri() won't, so
deprecate it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778678
This is a workaround for a regression in updating scrollbars in
some applications; notably eog. We haven't fully tracked down yet
why a queue_allocation is not sufficient here, it should.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765410
combo_box_popdown() of course doesn’t popdown our menu if it is NULL.
But the required call to this at end-of-life was in destroy(), by which
point dispose() already NULLed the menu, so Menu::popdown() would never
run, even if it should. Fix this by trying popdown() earlier in unmap().
Also, add a converse assurance that we don’t popup() while not mapped.
