Change constructors to reflect that.
While doing so, also add a fallback argument to the cursor constructors,
so it is now possible to create cursors with fallback.
The check used to achieve discarding events not meant for the window
widget itself (because they are handled in the regular paths). Using
the target widget is the equivalent now.
Use g_value_set/get_boxed() in gtk_window_get/set_property(), case PROP_ICON.
icon_from_list() shall always add a reference to the returned icon.
gtk_window_set_icon() must accept icon != NULL.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789870
We disconnect from the GDK window, so the renderer can't keep any useful
state.
Plus, we might be using an entirely different window next time we
realize (after a call to gtk_window_set_display() for example) that should
use a completely different renderer anyway.
And have a priv->display instead of a priv->screen.
Includes turning gtk_menu_set_screen() into gtk_menu_set_display(),
because that function just forwards to its window.
If the compositor prefers server-side decorations and the client doesn't
customize the title bar, we disable client-side decorations and let the
compositor know. Otherwise, we continue to use client-side decorations.
Signed-off-by: Drew DeVault <sir@cmpwn.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781909
As Timm Baedert pointed out, the previous fix made the
menubar go on top of popovers, which is just wrong. Instead,
make gtk_window_snapshot handle all direct children of the
window, taking care to stack popovers correctly.
This patch makes that work using 1 of 2 options:
1. Add all missing enums to the switch statement
or
2. Cast the switch argument to a uint to avoid having to do that (mostly
for GdkEventType).
I even found a bug while doing that: clearing a GtkImage with a surface
did not notify thae surface property.
The reason for enabling this flag even though it is tedious at times is
that it is very useful when adding values to an enum, because it makes
GTK immediately warn about all the switch statements where this enum is
relevant.
And I expect changes to enums to be frequent during the GTK4 development
cycle.
Clarify that ::destroy, not ::hide*, removes a window from its app, by
replacing the mention of open windows with the blurb on destruction from
:application, completing commit 7db4bee4b6
Also link to the equivalent gtk_application_(add|remove)_window() calls,
since Application.add_window() already links back to Window:application.
* unless you use gtkmm…
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=639931
Instead of relying on special values of edge constraints, this
patch adds an internal-only gdk_window_supports_edge_constraints()
function that by default returns FALSE, and is implemented by
GdkWindowWayland and GdkWindowX11.
This way, we can properly detect server-side support for this
feature and adapt accordingly.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=783669
The last touch on this patch series is making GtkWindow able to
selectively adjust various UI details based on the different
tiled edges. The main driver here is that we don't want to show
shadows on edges that are constrained.
This patch adds the necessary code to do that, while still
maintaining compatibility with the old ways.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=783669
GTK windows don't have their tiling states really
hooked into the client-side decoration code, and
the only effect it has is disabling the resizing
edges.
With the introduction of per-edge tiling information,
we are backed by much more precise data on how the
window manager wants the app to behave.
This patch, then, fixes GtkWindow to take into account
per-edge tiling information. For compatibility purposes,
the previous tiled field was kept, and thing will just
continue working if no edge information is supplied.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=783669
Do not connect to get_settings_for_screen() if we have no screen…
Use g_signal_connect(), not connect_object(), to match how set_screen()
makes this same connection, and how finalize() already disconnects it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705640
Since setting a clip is mandatory for almost all widgets, we can as well
change the size-allocate signature to include a out_clip parameter, just
like GtkCssGadget did. And since we now always propagate baselines, we
might as well pass that one on to size-allocate.
This way we can also make sure to transform the clip returned from
size-allocate to parent-coordinates, i.e. the same coordinate space
priv->allocation is in.
That means the whole hierarchy is getting destroyed, leaving those
behind incurs not only in a leak, but also on weak refs (and unintended
repick) to happen in the wrong moment.
As we now refrain from sending the crossing events if there's an
implicit grab, those events must be sent on button release when
the implicit grab is broken.
Check the grab widget (both explicit and implicit) and check for a cursor
from the target widget up to this grab widget. If the target widget is
outside the grab widget, only the grab wigdet's cursor will be checked.
This also means that we have to ensure the cursor is updated on button
releases, as an implicit grab being deactivated must trigger a cursor
lookup from the target widget.
