We want the role to be kept in the accessible object. Using
gtk_widget_class_set_accessible_role() is only meant as a quick
workaround to requiring subclassing of the accessibles in the quite
common case where a subclass does not change the accessible
implementation at all and only has a different role.
This is an attempt to explore differences in GTK+'s and gails
notions of which widget currently has the focus. Since gail
does all its focus updates in an idle, we cannot do the
comparisons synchronously, so just check ever so often in
a timeout.
GParamSpec now uses an intern'ed string for 'name', so the code
in gtk_theming_engine_register_property() which prefixes the name
with a namespace has to be adjusted.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=654695
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=653947
It could happen that a cookie event has been already allocated/freed
in an event filter, as it can't be allocated a second time, all GDK
can do is skipping the event. Spotted by Guillaume Desmottes.
This function can be used to find the GdkDevice wrapping
an XInput2 device ID. For core devices, the Virtual Core
Pointer/Keyboard IDs (2/3) may be used.
This function can be used to find out the XInput2 device ID
behind a GdkDevice, mostly useful when you need to interact
with say Clutter, or raw libXi calls.
-Added projects to compile the a11y portion of GTK+. This is now necessary
as a11y/GAIL is now integrated into the main GTK+ library, and it must
be built before compiling/linking GTK+. This project is done like the
GDK/GTK+ projects, where the source file listings for the VS2008/2010
projects are fed into templates (.vcprojin, .vcxprojin and
.vcxproj.filtersin) during 'make dist'
-Added projects to compile the libgail-util DLL (no templates for this
as this does not have source files added/removed often)
-Added the new projects into distribution, and headers, DLLs and .LIB files
into the "install" stage
Various paths in SAVE or CREATE_FOLDER return from ::should_respond() but
leave an asynchronous process running. This process checks some things
in the user's selection, for example, 'does the file exist, and if so
do we need to bring up an overwrite-confirmation dialog?'. When these
async processes complete *and* it is indeed time for the dialog to
be terminated (via the response-requested signal), we also need to
save the selection to the recently-used list - as ::should_respond() does
by itself in the cases when it can request a response immediately.
Signed-off-by: Federico Mena Quintero <federico@gnome.org>
