As discussed on desktop-devel-list [1], "There should be an intuitive,
consistent, immediate way to jump to the widgets that live in the
header bar." F10 has been suggested for this as it is already used to
active menubars.
F10 will focus the custom titlebar widget if the window has one and it
isn't already focused. If the titlebar widget doesn't exist or is
already focused then F10 focuses the menubar if there is one.
[1] https://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2014-February/msg00176.htmlhttps://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725141
It turns out popovers are already smart enough to cope with this
situation, so let popovers be internal children so things that rely
on gtk_container_forall(), like DnD, work without modifications.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725727
c287845240 was trying to fix
the memory leak caused by popovers begin destroyed in
gtk_window_destroy before chaining up to gtk_widget_destroy,
which unrealizes the window, and would clean up the popover
windows if the popovers were still around.
Fix this in a better way by moving the popover destruction
after the chaining up, so we unrealize first, and then
destroy the popovers.
Also, make _gtk_window_remove_popover unrealize the popover,
for symmetry with _gtk_window_add_popover.
This should fix
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=724921
Dragging windows was not working on widgets in the titlebar
region unless they had the window-dragging style property
set. Fix this by looking at the region for motion notify
events as well as for buton press events.
Try to do a better job of keeping example content
from being too wide. It is often rendered as <pre>
text so the only time we can wrap it is in the source.
It is best to full break lines at all punctuation and
to try to keep the width under 70 chars or so.
Heavy duty can prevent this idle function from being called before
the window is destroyed, so make sure that the source is removed
when the window is finalized.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=723771
Since realize does a lot of the heavy lifting of setting up
csd, we have to re-realize the window if we go from no-custom
titlebar to a custom titlebar or vice versa.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=722919
When gtk_window_set_titlebar is called, we need to set up
client-side decorations properly, and the easiest way to do
so is to realize the window again. Really, you should call
set_titlebar before the window is realized.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=722919
GtkWindow has 4 (!) APIs for setting window icons, and we
have to try them all in the right order to find the right
icon. This commit makes it so, and keeps the icon list
manipulation inside gtkwindow.c by adding a private API
for getting a single icon at the right size.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=722515
When all popovers are removed on destroy(), if a popover is nested into
(eg. with relative_to within) another popover, the removal of one can
lead to the other being removed while the hashtable is being iterated,
which would lead to undefined behavior in further iterations.
Then, use a GList to store popovers, iterating can be made more resilient
on these situations, and unless on pathological cases there's not going
to be as many of those popovers as to cause performance decreases at the
times those are iterated.
The popovers may return keyboard grabs to previous widgets, so if
called after unsetting the focus, the window may be left with a
dangling GtkWidget that would cause crash at later dispose() calls.
Popovers are strange in the sense that they aren't attached to a
parent directly, they rely on the relative_to widget so the toplevel
is shared, and when they have a parent, it is the toplevel itself,
not relative_to. This also means that there are conditions where the
popover loses it's parent, so they must survive unparenting.
The previous code would be floating the last reference as soon as the
parent is gone, but it was non-obvious who'd own that reference. So
fix this situation by granting the ownership of popovers to their
relative_to widget, an extra reference may be held by the toplevel
when the popover has a parent, but the popover object will be
guaranteed to be alive as long as the parent lives.
This way, memory management of popovers is as hidden from the user
as regular widgets within containers are, users are free to call
gtk_widget_destroy() on a popover, but it'd eventually become
destructed when relative_to is.
This makes it possible to move/resize client-side decorated windows that are
otherwise obscured by a GTK+ grab somewhere else, either a popover within the
window itself or a modal dialog above the window.
