I'm about to move children handling to the container node, which means
the generic code can no longer assume children APIs existing.
So rewrite the treemodel to work without it.
That way we can capture both the actual changes (clip region) and the
area that was redrawn (render region), which in OpenGL might not be
identical.
Nothing shows the render region yet though...
While GtkEventController implementations today are all GtkGesture, it is
possible to create a GtkEventController manually. This is an extrac check
to ensure we only add gestures to the list.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=774760
- Make the rows larger
- Display the elapsed time between renderings
- Display if it was a full or a partial redraw
- Add a toggle button to display profiler info
We now record all render operations and display them.
Warning: This is very brute force, you can't clear the recordings or
turn recording off. And this thing easily records 25MB per recorded
frame, so be careful to not run out of memory and get your browser
killed. ;)
This one introduces the Recording object which is essentially a single
instance of something that happened.
The RenderRecording is an instance of an actual rendering operation.
Switch code to use gdk_display_is_composited() instead.
The new code also doesn't use a vfunc to query the property but rather
requires the backend to call set_composited()/set_rgba() to change the
value.
Includes the ability to turn on updates in the inspector. Animations are
now run via a tick function which allows us to neatly overlay a
semi-transparent red rectangle and fade it out over time.
It also probably enables way more, but somebody with more UI neatness
than me needs to figure out what it eanbles first...
The update tracking code was ugly and using deprecated drawing APIs. It
was also in the wrong place.
So instead of trying to keep it working, I'll remove it. We need to find
a better way to put it and make it work there.
And with it, gtk_widget_get_visual() and gtk_widget_set_visual() are
gone.
We now always use the RGBA visual (if available) and otherwise fall back
to the system visual.
Calling eglGetDisplay forces libEGL to guess what kind of pointer you
passed it. Different EGL libraries will do different things here, and in
particular glvnd will do something different than Mesa. Since we do have
an API that allows us to explicitly type the display, use it.
The explicit call to eglGetProcAddress is working around a bug in
libepoxy 1.3, which does not understand the EGL concept of client
extensions. Since it does not, the normal epoxy resolver for
eglGetPlatformDisplayEXT would not find any provider for that entry
point, and crash when you attempted to call it.
Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=772415
EGLDisplays are already opaque pointers, and eglGetDisplay returns an
EGLDisplay not a pointer to one.
Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=772415
Some compilers we support, such as pre-2013 Visual Studio, does not support
for INIFINITY, log2() and exp2(), so check for exp2() and log2() during
configure, and use fallbacks for them and INIFINTY if they are not found.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766207
