Instead of returning the icon size with them, make
gtk_image_get_icon_name() and gtk_image_get_gicon() only return the icon
itself.
As a benefit, we can turn them into regular getters that return values
instead of requiring out parameters.
Instead, provide gtk_image_get_icon_size() to query the icon size.
These are no longer used, instead we always covert to surface as
early as possible and drop the pixbuf.
This means we never store both the pixbuf and the surface at
for any longer time, which is wasteful. Also, its one step further
to drop GdkPixbufs from generic use in our APIs.
This drops the pixbuf property and the pixbuf getters. We keep
gtk_image_new/set_from_pixbuf, but these are small helpers that
immediately convert to a surface, and there is no way to later get
back the pixbuf you passed in.
The from file/resource codepaths are also changed to load a surface
instead of a pixbuf.
This patch makes that work using 1 of 2 options:
1. Add all missing enums to the switch statement
or
2. Cast the switch argument to a uint to avoid having to do that (mostly
for GdkEventType).
I even found a bug while doing that: clearing a GtkImage with a surface
did not notify thae surface property.
The reason for enabling this flag even though it is tedious at times is
that it is very useful when adding values to an enum, because it makes
GTK immediately warn about all the switch statements where this enum is
relevant.
And I expect changes to enums to be frequent during the GTK4 development
cycle.
With the stock system being deprecated now, we should provide
meaningful accessible names for buttons that are constructed
from icon names or GIcons. This commit reuses the existing
translations.
It is possible that some common icon names are not covered
here because they were not present as stock items. These can
be added to the table later.
This commit exposes the get_type() functions and standard
headers for accessible implementations. This makes it possible
to derive from the GTK accessible implementations without
GType magic tricks. This is necessary, because we require the
a11y type hierarchy to be parallel to the widget type hierarchy.
So, if you derive a widget and need to adjust its a11y implementation,
you have to be able to derive its accessible implementation.
This commit probably exposes more than is absolutely necessary,
it also exposes accessibles of widgets that are unlikely candidates
for deriving from.
