While the workaround hides majority of the issue there are still two big downsides:
- shadow does eat from the widget dimensions so alignment is broken
- situations like popover going upwards on screen edge break completely
The appropriate action is to revert these theme duct tape solutions to make room
for a proper fix.
This reverts commit b3dba1dca6.
Issue https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/issues/1987
This removes the gdk_surface_set_shadow_width() function and related
vfuncs. The point here is that the shadow width and surface size can now
be communicated to GDK atomically, meaning it's possible to avoid
intermediate stages where the surface size includes the shadow, but
without the shadow width set, or the other way around.
This changes allocation of the widget trees to happen as a side effect
to the GdkSurface::layout signal, which first passes the GtkNative
instance where it is then forwarded to the implementations of the
GtkNative interface.
The implementations of GtkNative are the ones doing the actual
gtk_widget_allocate(), and they do so in their GtkNativeClass::layout
function.
The size should correspond what gtk_widget_measure() does, and it
measures what's within the window excluding the shadow; so make this
helper function correspond to this.
GTK4 doesn't support arbitrary constraints when resizing a window (e.g.
steps, or aspect ratio), so we don't need to care about the result from
compute-size when doing interactive resizing.
This follows the trail of the Wayland backend in that GdkSurface changes
happen during the layout phase, and that a GDK_CONFIGURE no longer being
used to communicate the size changes of a surface; this now also uses
the layout signal on the GdkSurface.
If a surface scheduled a relayout, got frozen, and a layout phase
happened, then got unfrozen, it wouldn't see it's layout being
requested; avoid this race by remembering the pending phases until they
actually happened.
Reading the comment, it seems to be related being a window manager
decoration utility; this is not something GTK4 aims to handle, just drop
support for this.
Showing before the child would result in bogus
gdk_drag_surface_present() with an "empty" (1x1) size. This can easily
be avoided by postponing showing until there is anything to show.
By moving popup layout emission to the layout phase, the current
GdkPopup::poup-layout-changed signal has no value on its own as it'd be
ignored by GtkPopover.
Make the Wayland backend communicate the popup layout changes via the
common signal; but leave the rest intact until other backends catch up.
Put them in a anonymous struct, and separate the toplevel specific ones
into another anonymous struct inside the first one. Later popup related
fields will be added.
Don't have GtkRoot listen directly to the layout signal on the frame
clock, but let it pass through GdkSurface. This will allow GdkSurface to
be more involved in the layout phase.
Scheduling an update when frozen would reschedule when unfrozen; change
this to a generic pending phase enum, and use this for resrcheduling
paint and compute-size.
GdkSurface's are initialized to have the size 1x1, as otherwise we'd
receive an X11 error, would a corresponding X11 window be created.
This confuses the "saved size" mechanisms in the Wayland backend, as
treats 0 as uninitialized, and not 1.
Fix this simply not saving size that if it's smaller or equal than 1.
This will be handled between 'update' (which may trigger animation
ticks, CSS update, etc) and 'layout' which will allocate the widget
tree. It's meant to perform surface size computation, and is done
between these two phases in order to have an up to date state, and
letting the layout phase have an up to date size to layout in.
Concentrate state application to the start of a frame; this is to avoid
having GTK going back and forth between different state if so would
happen between two frames.
Queue it, and then wait for it to actually take effect, i.e. be
confirmed via a configure event from the compositor, before setting the
actual GdkSurface::state value.
The plan is to concencrate size computations as part of the frame clock
dispatch, meaning we shouldn't do it synchronously in the present()
function.
Still, in Wayland, and maybe elsewhere, it is done in the present()
function, e.g. when no state change was made, but this will eventually
be changed.
Mapping a surface under Wayland is an asynchronous process, where one
creates a surface and commits an initial state without having drawn
anything, then waiting for a configuration, which then is acknowledged
and content is painted and committed. Not until having received this
configuration is a surface actually mapped, so wait with setting the
mappedness until this.
We don't need the OpenGL view to be transparent if the window itself
is not transparent. This has the potential to speed up the compositing
of the GL view onto the NSWindow.
