Apparently it's not possible in GtkTextView to say "this style should
apply to all text, including newly inserted text. Or I'm just too stupid
to use its API.
So instead, keep using override_color().
We move our menus.ui file into Gtk's namespace so that it will get
picked up. Accordingly, we no longer have to do any of the work for
ourselves...
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=722092
Move bloatpad to ./examples/bp/ so that we can start treating it as more of a
"normal" app instead of just jamming everything into a single .c file.
We don't use the name "bloatpad" for the directory in order not to
create 'git pull' pain with the probably-already-existing executable of
the same name.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=722092
Cook up some silly cases to test out the hidden-when='' attribute.
- make sure hidden-when='action-missing' shows/hides items based on
actions being created and destroyed
- make sure hidden-when='action-disabled' shows/hides items based on
actions being enabled and disabled
- make sure hidden-when='action-missing' doesn't hide items when the
action is merely disabled
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=688421
Notifications can only be associated with application actions,
but clear is a window action. Introduce a "clear-all" action
that forwards to clear on all windows.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=721633
Make the sunny example useful by giving it a header bar
with app menu fallback. To test this under gnome-shell,
set APP_MENU_FALLBACK=1 in the environment.
We rename the gtk_widget_class_bind_template_child{_internal}
macros by appending a _private to their name. Otherwise, it
would be too magic to pass the 'public' names as arguments,
but affect a member of the Private struct. At the same time,
Add two new macros with the old names,
gtk_widget_class_bind_template_child{_internal} that operate
on members of the instance struct.
The macros and functions are inconsistently named, and are not tied to
the "template" concept - to the point that it seems plausible to use
them without setting the template.
The new naming scheme is as follows:
gtk_widget_class_bind_template_child_full
gtk_widget_class_bind_template_callback_full
With the convenience macros:
gtk_widget_class_bind_template_child
gtk_widget_class_bind_template_child_internal
gtk_widget_class_bind_template_callback
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700898https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700896
Using an offset from the struct means you can have children in
both the public and private (via G_PRIVATE_OFFSET) parts of the
instance. It also matches the new private macros nicer.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=702563
Signed-off-by: Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi@gnome.org>
Setting up the icon and desktop file is a pretty central part
of making an application work, so we should do it for our example.
The fact that the examples are uninstalled makes this a little
more complicated.
I disconnected signals in dispose() to avoid a visible-tab
change notification during destruction, but this is clunky.
Instead, make the notify::visible-tab signal handler bail out
early when called during destruction.
Add a new example to the getting started part of the docs. The focus
of this example is on 'new stuff': GtkApplication, templates, settings,
gmenu, gaction, GtkStack, GtkHeaderBar, GtkSearchBar, GtkRevealer,
GtkListBox, GtkMenuButton, etc.
It is being developed in several steps. Each step is put in a separate
directory below examples/: application1, ..., application8. This is a
little repetitive, but lets us use the code of all examples in the
documentation.
