Since gtk+ draws more than the widget and allocates more size to it than
it knows about, this flag doesn't work anymore. Removing it (or setting
it to TRUE for widgets that used to set it to FALSE) fixes drawing
invalidation when these widgets get allocated a new size.
process-stop-symbolic is unintuitive if represented as a stop sign as in
Adwaita, and completely ambiguous if represented as a cross like the
window close button in other icon themes.
Instead, use application-x-executable, which is already used elsewhere
as a fallback if no specific icon can be found for the application.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=784624
Since setting a clip is mandatory for almost all widgets, we can as well
change the size-allocate signature to include a out_clip parameter, just
like GtkCssGadget did. And since we now always propagate baselines, we
might as well pass that one on to size-allocate.
This way we can also make sure to transform the clip returned from
size-allocate to parent-coordinates, i.e. the same coordinate space
priv->allocation is in.
Add a new ::measure vfunc similar to GtkCssGadget's that widget
implementations have to override instead of the old get_preferred_width,
get_preferred_height, get_preferred_width_for_height,
get_preferred_height_for_width and
get_preferred_height_and_baseline_for_width.
gtk_widget_destroy() removes widgets from their container. However
_internal_ widgets must be unref'ed using gtk_widget_unparent() instead.
This is symmetric with the fact that these widgets were ref'ed by direct
call to gtk_widget_set_parent(). It's also the method that was used in
gtk_headerbar_destroy().
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=772859
The GtkHeaderBar gadget implementation was subtly broken: it called
gtk_widget_set_allocation both in gtk_header_bar_size_allocate (with
the actual allocation) and in gtk_header_bar_allocate_contents (with
the content allocation of the main gadget). Dropping the second call
fixes the render node conversion for GtkHeaderBar.
commit 0015ebc4a8 reworked
some of the titlebar size allocation code. Those changes
inadvertently introduced a warning when the application sets
the headerbar title widget to be hidden.
This commit fixes that warning.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=768184
The header bar currently ignores the expand property on its
children. This commit changes the code to honor that property.
It divvies up any free space and distributes it equally to packed
children (with any left over space given out a pixel at a time
on a first come, first serve basis).
This commit also adds support for the title widget to be made
expandable.
It accomplishes this by using up the padding the title widget
is centered with.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=724332
In order to support the expand property on children, we're
going to need to look at the size of the packed children
on each side of the title widget, up front, before allocating
them (to compute how much extra allocation each expanded child
gets).
This commit lays the groundwork for that analysis by splitting
the size calculation of each side of the header bar outside
of the loop that allocates each child of the header bar.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=724332
With a headerbar, the widget in the center may be a label, constructed
internally, or a custom widget, constructed externally. The size
allocation code needs to handle either case the same way for the most
part. There's more than one place in the code that checks which of
the two widgets to use and does some operation on the selected one.
This commit simplifies the code by checking up front which one is the
center (title) widget and storing that in a temporary variable,
This allows reducing duplicated logic later on in the function.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=724332
There's some extraneous MIN() calls that have predetermined answers.
This commit drops them and then simplifies a few redudant checks into
one MIN call.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=724332
The size allocation code maintains an array of two elements,
to track the allocation of children packed into the two sides
of a header bar. Sometimes this array is indexed with 0 and 1,
and sometimes its indexed with GTK_PACK_START and GTK_PACK_END.
The latter happen to have the values 0 and 1, respectively, but
that's not really obvious.
For clarity, this commit changes the code to index those arrays
consistently, sticking to 0 and 1 across the board.
It's only possible to have a label or a custom title, not both.
The size allocate code confusingly treats them as independent.
That is confusing, because, as the code is written, it makes it
look like the space for the custom title isn't getting accounted
for.
This commit else-ifies some parts of the size allocate code for
clarity.
GtkHeadeBar checks the window type hint to determine if the regular
buttons such as menu, maximize or iconify should be visible in the
header bar.
However, an application may very well use a "normal" toplevel window and
set it transient and modal afterwards. In such a case, the iconify
button would remain visible, and the user can hide the window, but being
a modal, the parent window would remain insensitive.
Check for the window type, modality and transient relationship to decide
whether or not the regular toplevel buttons should be visible in the
header bar.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=767052
We use a label_sizing_box to make sure the headerbar can always contain
both a title and a subtitle without resizing when showing/hiding either
of them, but we should only do that for the height; the min width of the
label_box can be larger than that of the label_sizing_box.
The window button setup depends on properties of the toplevel window.
Instead of updating the setup on realize, do it when the toplevel
changes.
This makes sure that when a GtkHeaderBar is added to a window
all the widgets are present and get_preferred_height() will return
the height the widget will have when finally shown. This allows
the logic in gtkwindow to select the right window size so that
the content size will match the requested default size.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=756618
