and gtk_image_set_can_shrink().
Images are meant to always be icon-sized, they can never shrink below
that.
And images are icons, so they are meant to be square. If they are
not, we pretned that's by accident and keep aspect ratio.
This commit introduces GtkPicture, which is supposed to complement
GtkImage.
GtkImage will be adapted to always display an icon, while
GtkPicture displays regular imagery.
Instead declare a priv local. We should do this even if we don't remove
the priv pointer from GtkWidget entirely, just to stay consistent with
new code we introduce.
Otherwise, requesting a min size in em where the equivalent in px had a
fractional part would lead to the widget getting allocated 1 too few px.
You could see this in the CSS property vs. allocation in the Inspector.
Note that margin/border/padding are left alone: the rationale is that we
do as browsers do, and Benjamin said we already do that for those,
whereas his tests on min-(width|height) showed otherwise. My subsequent
analysis indicated it to be far less clear-cut than that, but he remains
unconvinced that we should ceil() all the things! So just do these ones.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/issues/1088
Causing a grab in the handler for ::pressed by, e.g., popping up a
context menu will cause the gesture to be canceled and, subsequently,
::end and ::released to be fired, all while the button is still
physically pressed. That results in no event being available to the
::released handler and garbage coordinates, given that
gtk_gesture_get_point() returns FALSE.
Emitting ::released can be avoided by checking the return value
gtk_gesture_get_point().
Querying the event sequence of a gesture will always yield NULL for
non-touch events, but passing NULL in to calls to
gtk_gesture_get_last_event() is a perfectly valid use case.
That code branch is meant to check for key events, seems obvious we want
GDK_KEY_PRESS, not GDK_BUTTON_PRESS (which also broke the branch right
below).
Makes us all able to dismiss popovers again.
We can just as well use notify::has-focus for the purpose of
focus tracking, and we can at the same time avoid emitting the
deprecated AtkObject::focus-event signal.
:climb-rate is not about what you get when you single-click on a button,
as this implied: it's what happens if you hold down a button or a key.
Fix the description of @climb_rate to new(), and while here, mention the
key in the blurb of :climb-rate itself.
The last round of patches to get the desired direction of value move in
response to scrolls/keypresses on scales had the inadvertent side effect
of giving the opposite direction on scrollbars. Seeing as gtkrange.c is
already a collection of hacks, add another so that fix only holds if the
instance is a GtkScale, since that is what those patches were aimed at.
Close https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/issues/1065
