This reverts commit 6ee2bf6286.
There is a way to get different kinds of borders: it's CSS. It's better
to keep the 4 Frames and demo the different styles we can do using CSS.
This class is not added by any widgets nor themed by Adwaita/HC.
However, it is presented here as if it does something. It doesn’t.
But we changed the 2 buttons with the .raised class to use symbolic
icons, unlike their ‘unraised’ counterparts, which is unnecessarily
confusing and might make people think .raised affects icons somehow.
So, make them use the same icons in all cases; that way, if .raised is
ever made to do anything, 6 years later, what it does will be clear.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=644248
Instead of showing the 4 types except for GTK_SHADOW_NONE, which are all
treated identically and provide no way for themes to differentiate, just
keep 2 Frames, and make one of them GTK_SHADOW_NONE to demo a flat Frame
Since setting a clip is mandatory for almost all widgets, we can as well
change the size-allocate signature to include a out_clip parameter, just
like GtkCssGadget did. And since we now always propagate baselines, we
might as well pass that one on to size-allocate.
This way we can also make sure to transform the clip returned from
size-allocate to parent-coordinates, i.e. the same coordinate space
priv->allocation is in.
We now rely on toplevels receiving and forwarding all the events
the windowing should be able to handle. Event masks are no longer a
way to determine whether an event is deliverable ot a widget.
Events will always be delivered in the three captured/target/bubbled
phases, widgets can now just attach GtkEventControllers and let those
handle the events.
…erties clobbered by commit c92b7d4224.
That and its counterpart were for removing :expand and :fill child props
from GtkBox, but they ended up catching these for GtkToolItemGroup too.
While GtkToolItemGroup still has these, we may as well keep demoing them
We're mixing a lot of styles in the Meson build files. This is an
attempt at making everything slightly more consistent in terms of
whitespace and indentation.
This was only every implemented under X11, and with CSD,
this is clearly in the application realm. We should not
pretend that we can support it on the toolkit level.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=775061
