Instead of creating a GdkX11Cursor, create GdkCursors. Cache the XCursor
in a hash table instead.
Also, make use of the new fallback mechanism for fallback code: Make
sure to provide cursors for the names that are guaranteed to exist, but
do not do bad attempts at displaying texture surfaces.
Black/White/transparent is not a replacement for those.
And have a priv->display instead of a priv->screen.
Includes turning gtk_menu_set_screen() into gtk_menu_set_display(),
because that function just forwards to its window.
The event coordinates are (so far) irrelevant to what we are testing here,
just make all events happen in the middle of the window in order to ensure
all widgets receive it. More importantly, avoid using fixed pixel distances,
since we don't get guarantees about window sizes.
Fixes the gestures testsuite on X11.
Now all widgets are mandated to handle the real thing, which means no
pointer events are emulated for the pointer emulating touch. The output
of these tests relied on this fact, so update to the tests handling real
touch events.
Legacy GtkWidget vmethods are now handled on an event controller, which
due to being the very first controller added to every widget, runs in
a different order than the previously hardcoded.
Probably testing legacy events is not really futurible, specially after
we stop installing this legacy controller by default. I'll leave the
choice to remove these specific tests for later though.
Visual Studio does not support things like -Wl,export-dynamic, so we
need to export those symbols by using __declspec(dllexport). So, we
decorate these with macros which we define accordingly for this purpose.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=785210
It's getting harder and harder to find a dummy style property to use
here, so remove the test case since style properties should be going
away soon anyway.
Previously, we would request a size of 0×0 when the transition type was
NONE and the child un-revealed, making the revealer in this case a
gtk_widget_set_visible replacement. Instead, to the exact same thing we
do in the CROSSFADE case and request the child size instead. This also
keeps the revealer from under allocating the child when the transition
type is set to NONE.
Events that get to gtk_main_do_event() have the toplevel GdkWindow
as event->any.window. Also, ensure that coordinates fall within
sensible places of the windows, since those might have shadows,
headerbars and whatnot on wayland.
It was only testing the default configuration, where overlay scrolling
is on and both scrollbars use POLICY_AUTOMATIC. We should also test the
other 3 configurations that are available by including non-overlay
scrollbars and/or those that use POLICY_ALWAYS.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778853
The `-export-dynamic` flag is a libtool-specific flag; since we're not
using libtool with Meson, we should instruct the C compiler to use the
appropriate linker flag instead.
This was only every implemented under X11, and with CSD,
this is clearly in the application realm. We should not
pretend that we can support it on the toolkit level.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=775061
It was only testing the default configuration where overlay-scrolling is
TRUE and the policy is POLICY_AUTOMATIC. We should also test FALSE and
POLICY_ALWAYS. This commit adds those tests and makes the !overlay &&
POLICY_ALWAYS case pass by excluding the size of the relevant scrollbar,
as we are only interested in whether the content size is as requested.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778853
gboolean ret for whether gtk_text_iter_backward_line() moved the iter
was declared but not used anywhere. I presume it was meant to be
checked, and it passes now, so let’s do it.
