It was only testing the default configuration, where overlay scrolling
is on and both scrollbars use POLICY_AUTOMATIC. We should also test the
other 3 configurations that are available by including non-overlay
scrollbars and/or those that use POLICY_ALWAYS.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778853
It was only testing the default configuration where overlay-scrolling is
TRUE and the policy is POLICY_AUTOMATIC. We should also test FALSE and
POLICY_ALWAYS. This commit adds those tests and makes the !overlay &&
POLICY_ALWAYS case pass by excluding the size of the relevant scrollbar,
as we are only interested in whether the content size is as requested.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778853
gboolean ret for whether gtk_text_iter_backward_line() moved the iter
was declared but not used anywhere. I presume it was meant to be
checked, and it passes now, so let’s do it.
gtk_text_iter_backward_line() checks the value of
real->line_char_offset without previously calling
ensure_char_offsets (real) to make sure the former
is up-to-date.
As a consequence of this, when gtk_text_iter_backward_line()
is called after a gtk_text_buffer_insert_range() in the
first line of buffer, the iter is not moved to the start of
the line, and the return value is wrong.
Fixed by adding the ensure_char_offsets() call.
A test case for this bug is added to the textiter gtk testsuite.
Images with just an aspect ratio, but without a size, should be scaled
to be fully visible in the given area.
But we scaled them to completely cover the given area, which made them
partially invisible.
Reftest included.
When the background-clip of the background is smaller than the
background-clip of blended images, not pushing a group is wrong.
Test testing exactly that included.
In order to eliminate g_test_expect_message() (which doesn’t work with
G_LOG_USE_STRUCTURED), make the warning about the fallback theme not
existing be conditional on the icon theme search path containing a
system path. Any application code which modifies the search path does so
through appends and prepends, so this should not affect whether the
warning is emitted in production.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=769485
Previously a style cascade's parent could not have a parent itself. That
represented the two levels at which you could add a style provider: at
the screen level, with gtk_style_context_add_provider_for_screen(), and
at the style context level, with gtk_style_context_add_provider().
This commit changes no functionality, but this change will be necessary
for adding style providers in the future that apply to a subtree of the
widget tree. It relaxes the requirement that a style cascade's parent
must not have a parent, since in the future a style context may be
affected by any number of parent widgets' style contexts.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751409
The maximum content size does not increase the minimum request
but only ensures that both minimum and natural requests do not
exceed the maximum setting.
Commit 023f406c96 has a typo that results
in this error:
../../../testsuite/gtk/notify.c: In function 'test_type':
../../../testsuite/gtk/notify.c:679:54: error: expected expression
before ')' token
(g_str_equal (pspec->name, "max-content-width") ||)
^
The allowed values for the max-content- properties depend
on the value of the min-content- properties, in a way that
our simple test is not prepared to deal with. Just skip
them for now.
Setting the font: shorthand to something like smaller is not
in line with the css spec. Just set the font-size: property
for this.
Also fix the other font: shorthand to specify size and family
according to the css spec.
