The new function, gtk_render_background_get_clip answers the
question: what pixels are affected if I call gtk_render_background ?
The long-term goal is to have APIs that answer this question for
all rendering primitives.
Commit 8e975b2 (Bug 753969) introduced check of parent accessibility.
Consequently it is not possible to save file if executable attribute
is not set, which might happen for some gvfs backends. Let's assume
that the folder is accessible even if the attribute is not set.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=760881
The viewport itself doesn't move, so we cannot use it as the pixel
cache's background. Use the bottommost using element instead, which is
the viewport's child.
This might need adaptations in themes as we want the backgroud to be
opaque to speed up pixel cache performance.
Use gtk_box_gadget_reverse_children and gtk_css_node_reverse_children
to flip the children of the header_gadget and the tabs_gadget when
appropriate.
Add new CSS node tests to verify that the node order is updated
as expected in all cases.
These functions will be automatically called by the windowing backend.
The usual hooks to run this from in gtk/ shouldn't even happen, but
it is worth to document which calls are expected and which aren't.
If the grab window is destroyed the grab will be implicitly removed,
although we won't get GdkSeat:ungrab called in order to clear our
internal window<->seat relation entirely. Setting a weak ref will
nullify the pointer we keep on the seat to the window, avoiding the
expected crashes.
Due to implicit grabs, we basically can guarantee that the pointer
won't have any buttons pressed at the time of wl_pointer.enter.
Seems like a good place to unset any button modifiers that might
have been left stale by compositor grabs.
When this is in use, there's essentially a bunch of dead code here.
When all backends are ported, we'll be able to remove grab/cursor
management plus a bunch of source-side event handlers.
This includes managing input events and source-side DND events,
as well as setting the appropriate cursor and emitting the signals
that are expected in this mode of operation.
This function (most similar to gtk_drag_get_cursor() helps figure out
the right cursor that applies to a given action. To be used by the
various backends.
We've traditionally left GTK+ to handle the input side of things,
letting GDK only manage the windowing-specific messaging. This
way of splitting responsibilities is not compatible however with
some backends, we must fold then input management at the DnD stage
into GDK (and backends) domain.
The gdk_drag_context_manage_dnd() call is meant to be the entry
point for this mode of operation, if the drag and drop operation
becomes managed, the caller (i.e. gtkdnd.c) doesn't need to perform
grabs, nor manage input events itself.
As a consequence of this, different aspects now belong to the
backend GdkDragContext implementation:
- Because the caller doesn't see keyboard events anymore,
keyboard navigation must be managed in GDK, so is the decision
of the current action based on modifiers/button pressed.
- Because the caller won't see input events in general, the lifetime
of the drag and drop operation is now communicated through the
::drop-performed, ::dnd-finished and ::cancel events
- Because the caller doesn't participate anymore on the action
being chosen, the pointer cursor must be set by the backend.
The caller is rather notified of the final action through the
::action signal.
The caller is still responsible of dealing with the corresponding
GdkSelection, ensuring its ownership and communicating the supported
mimetypes.
... and remove the also forgotten void function that lingered around
with it.
Fixes opacity=0 parts like inactive spinners or sort indicators in
treeview headers being drawn since last commit.
Oops.
Previously, we had a special cae to draw subwindows of widgets.
This is not necessary as conformant widgets should be able to properly
render themselves when all windows need to be painted.
From now on assume that is the case.
We therefore paint nonnative GDK windows "inline" by just returning TRUE
for gtk_cairo_should_draw_window() for those windows.
This speeds up hilighting different rows in the listbox gtk-demo example
tremendously (by a factor of 10 or more) as the previous code was
O(<number of non-window subwidgets> *
<number of subwindows>) which in the listbox example were ~15,000 and
~2,000 respectively.
When using forall(), only list the revealer, which lists the box
containing all the children. When using foreach(), bypass revealer and
box and list all children added to the box.
Derived classes like GtkSourceView with their own ::key-event
handler need access to this, in order to make their keynav
as nice as the builtin one, wrt to caret visibility.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=760748
And use it to handle kinetic scrolling in the GtkScrolledWindow.
However, dropping the delta check causes the X11-based kinetic
scroll to break since we don't have the stop event here. Correct handling of
xf86-input-libinput-based scroll events is still being discussed.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=756729
This adds support for the new wl_pointer events available in v5.
The wl_pointer.axis_source events can be ignored for the purposes here, the
main reason they exist is so that the combination of axis_source=finger and
axis_stop triggers kinetic scrolling. We don't need to care about the source,
axis_stop is enough for us to tell us when we're scrolling.
The wl_pointer.frame events group events together and is intended as a
mechanism to coalesce events together. This for example allows us to now
send a single GTK scroll event for a diagonal scroll. Previously, the two
wl_pointer.axis events had to be handled separately.
The wl_pointer.axis_discrete event sends mouse wheel clicks where
appropriate, and is translated into up/down/left/right scroll events.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=756729
Since a41f02f9b1, GtkIMContextSimple
uses threads to load X Compose files. It does that every time a new
im context object is initialized, so we can easily end up with multiple
threads accessing the shared global_tables list at the same time.
Use a lock to prevent that.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276432
