And with it, gtk_widget_get_visual() and gtk_widget_set_visual() are
gone.
We now always use the RGBA visual (if available) and otherwise fall back
to the system visual.
The cursor was set using gdk_window_set_cursor() even in
gdk_window_new().
So instead of having yet another flag, just make the users of that flag
call gdk_window_set_cursor() directly after the window was created.
X11 was the only backend to support it and people can just override it
using XSetClassHint() directly.
The docs already advertised the function as "Do not use".
Keep the existing call to XSetClassHint() in place, so that we keep
setting the same values as in GTK3.
gtk_widget_destroy() removes widgets from their container. However
_internal_ widgets must be unref'ed using gtk_widget_unparent() instead.
This is symmetric with the fact that these widgets were ref'ed by direct
call to gtk_widget_set_parent(). It's also the method that was used in
gtk_headerbar_destroy().
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=772859
> Due to Gtk+ keeping a reference to the window internally,
> gtk_window_new() does not return a reference to the caller.
> To delete a GtkWindow, call gtk_widget_destroy().
Caller(s) aren't expecting a need to delete help_overlay themselves
once they've installed it. (E.g. see gtk_application_window_added()).
I didn't notice any direct precedents, but there's a parallel in the
current implementation of gtk_container_destroy() which uses
gtk_widget_destroy() on any added widget.
This avoids leaking 100s of kB per window, when I tested nautilus.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=772859
This allows the use of a "text-direction" hint set to one of "none", "rtl",
or "ltr" to enforce the text direction of a "horizontal-buttons"
display-hint.
This is useful when a menu has buttons that map to physical space in the
UI and therefore must match the application widgetry.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=772775
to hilight drop target there is a wildcard selector which turns
the border and shadow to green, this clearly shouldn't happen when
the whole window is a drop target.
...by putting it in a stack. The busy_spinner and eject_button are
mutually exclusive, but only the latter was coded to ensure that its
visibility did not cause the rest of the row to reflow. By putting both
widgets in a stack and setting child_visible on that, the row allocates
enough space to show one - or none - at once, avoiding any misalignment.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=772345https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=772348
Calling eglGetDisplay forces libEGL to guess what kind of pointer you
passed it. Different EGL libraries will do different things here, and in
particular glvnd will do something different than Mesa. Since we do have
an API that allows us to explicitly type the display, use it.
The explicit call to eglGetProcAddress is working around a bug in
libepoxy 1.3, which does not understand the EGL concept of client
extensions. Since it does not, the normal epoxy resolver for
eglGetPlatformDisplayEXT would not find any provider for that entry
point, and crash when you attempted to call it.
Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=772415
EGLDisplays are already opaque pointers, and eglGetDisplay returns an
EGLDisplay not a pointer to one.
Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=772415
We currently beep when a character is appended at the end in
overwrite mode. That is obviously not right. Patch based on
a patch by Ian MacDonald.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=772389
