Restructure the getters for event fields to
be more targeted at particular event types.
Update all callers, and replace all direct
event struct access with getters.
As a side-effect, this drops some unused getters.
Replace the gdk_surface_move_to_rect() API with a new GdkSurface
method called gdk_surface_present_popup() taking a new GdkPopupLayout
object describing how they should be laid out on screen.
The layout properties provided are the same as the ones used with
gdk_surface_move_to_rect(), except they are now set up using
GdkPopupLayout.
Calling gdk_surface_present_popup() will either show the popup at the
position described using the popup layout object and a new unconstrained
size, or reposition it accordingly.
In some situations, such as when a popup is set to autohide, presenting
may immediately fail, in case the grab was not granted by the display
server.
After a successful present, the result of the layout can be queried
using the following methods:
* gdk_surface_get_position() - to get the position relative to its
parent
* gdk_surface_get_width() - to get the current width
* gdk_surface_get_height() - to get the current height
* gdk_surface_get_rect_anchor() - to get the anchor point on the anchor
rectangle the popup was effectively positioned against given
constraints defined by the environment and the layout rules provided
via GdkPopupLayout.
* gdk_surface_get_surface_anchor() - the same as the one above but for
the surface anchor.
A new signal replaces the old "moved-to-rect" one -
"popup-layout-changed". However, it is only intended to be emitted when
the layout changes implicitly by the windowing system, for example if
the monitor resolution changed, or the parent window moved.
We only have implementations of this on X11 and Win32,
so make it available as backend api there.
Update all callers to use either the backend api, or
just monitor 0.
We use a compilation symbol in our build to allow the inclusion of
specific headers while building GTK, to avoid the need to include only
the global header.
Each namespace has its own compilation symbol because we used to have
different libraries, and strict symbol visibility between libraries;
now that we have a single library, and we can use private symbols across
namespaces while building GTK, we should have a single compilation
symbol, and simplify the build rules.
The "iconified" state is mostly an X11-ism; every other platform calls
this state "minimized" because it may not involve turning a window into
an icon at all.
Windows/surface's aren't supposed to be explicitly moved by any external
part, so don't provide API for doing so. Usage throughout Gdk is
replaced by the corresponding backend variants.
The generic layer still does the heavy lifting, leaving the backends
more or less just act as thin wrappers, dealing a bit with global
coordinate transformations. The end goal is to remove explicit surface
moving from the generic gdk layer.
To separate how toplevels and popups are configured, a first step is to
introduce a resize-only vfunc for backends to implement. It's meant to
only configure toplevel windows, i.e. popups. Currently it's used for
both types, but introducing the resize-only API is a first step.
1) In the SetWindowPos() function (and the WINDOWPOS struct) the
"hWndInsertAfter" argument/field means the window that will be
directly above after the change, not the window that will be
directly below. MSDN says "precedes" for SetWindowPos(), but
WINDOWPOS documentation is more precise: this is the window
behind which the affected window will be placed. Apparently,
Z-axis goes back-to-front.
Therefore, logging should be reworded correctly.
2) When we switch away from the application and then switch back
to a transient window, we need to bring up its transient-owner
(and its transient-owner's owner and so forth) as well,
otherwise our transient (modal) window might be transient for
something that might not be visible.
3) When we bring up a window, we should bring all of its children
(popup windows) on top of it.
Because Windows doesn't provide a function to bring one window
on top of the other, we have to work around this by calling
SetWindowPos() twice, swapping the windows between the calls.
GTK4 doesn't have WS_CHILD windows anymore, so hWndParent argument
to CreateWindowEx() is always interpreted as the owner window,
not the parent window.
A window with an owner:
* is above the owner in Z-order
* is destroyed when the owner is destroyed
* is hidden when the owner is minimized
This is enforced by the OS.
GTK can only allow this for popup windows.
Desktop window must never[0] be an owner.
[0]: https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20040224-00/?p=40493
Popups can't be active or inactive, so emitting GDK events
in response to WM_ACTIVATE makes no sense for these kinds
of GDK surfaces.
The jury is still out on whether we should block (return 0)
or ignore (don't return anything) this message.
Blocking WM_NCACTIVATE (which we currently ignore) is definitely
not an option - it completely breaks input somehow.
1) Handle GDK_SURFACE_POPUP in RegisterGdkClass()
(for now pretend it's the same as GDK_SURFACE_TOPLEVEL)
2) Remove useless code from GDK_SURFACE_TOPLEVEL case in _gdk_win32_display_create_surface()
(now there's just GDK_SURFACE_TOPLEVEL there, no need for a type check)
3) Have a separate case for GDK_SURFACE_POPUP and ensure that
it doesn't get WS_CHILDWINDOW (and neither should GDK_SURFACE_TEMP).
Somewhat change the order of initialization (to be closer
to what Wayland backend does).
Also remove the wrapper field that is no longer needed -
it used to hold a pointer to the main GdkWindow instance,
which wrapped GdkWin32ImplWindow. Since impls are gone,
nothing is wrapping anything anymore.
Fix a substitution error, where wrong pointer was added
to the hash table. Added a comment to ensure that future readers
(including myself) won't be confused by the fact that we're
inserting a pointer instead of the handle itself.
We want to use a gdk_surface_new_popup for popups,
and align the constructor names with the surface
types, so rename
gdk_surface_new_popup -> gdk_surface_new_temp
gdk_surface_new_popup_full -> gdk_surface_new_popup
The temp surface type will disappear eventually.
All the information in it is already contained
in the surface object we pass along, and none
of the backend implementations were using the
attributes at all.
We are not creating such surfaces anymore, and
they were only ever meaningfully implemented
on X11. Drop the concept, and the api for determining
if a surface is input-only.
