Windows save in hardware_keycode an information which is not so low
level and some application require the hardware scancode.
As Windows provides this information save it in GdkEventPrivate
and provide a function to get this information.
For no Windows system the function return the hardware_keycode instead.
Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio <fziglio@redhat.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765259
Because there are multiple different types of styluses that can be used with
tablets, we have to have some sort of identifier for them attached to the
GdkDeviceTool, especially since knowing the actual tool type for a GdkDeviceTool
is necessary for matching up a GdkDeviceTool with it's appropriate
GdkInputSource in Wayland (eg. matching up a GdkDeviceTool eraser with the
GDK_SOURCE_ERASER GdkInputSource of a wayland tablet).
Signed-off-by: Stephen Chandler Paul <thatslyude@gmail.com>
The virtual host assigns the name of the mouse device to
"VirtualBox USB Tablet" in VirtualBox and we'd use that device as mouse.
If not, GtkTooltip is not enabled.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763017
Sigh.
Now that we've neutered the QEMU USB tablet, I'm finding that
spice is doing just the same nonsense. It has a fake "spice vdagent
tablet". Blacklist that as well.
Commit 1266d15c4 also broke Xwayland, as it does the same trick
than VMWare pointers. Let's extend the heuristic to check for "pointer"
in the device name, what can possibly go wrong...
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757358
VMWare seems to create mouse devices with abs axes which confuses
our detection of single-touch touchscreens. Those have though a
name we can match on ("VirtualPS/2 VMware VMMouse"), it should
be pretty safe to assume that no real touchscreens have "mouse"
in their name...
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757358
Those won't have ABS_MT_* axes, so won't be reported has having
XITouchClassInfo. Fallback on these to checking whether abs x/y axes are
available. After the Wacom checks, any remaining device with absolute axes
should be touchscreens, and GDK_SOURCE_MOUSE does indeed just make sense on
devices with relative axes.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757358
Otherwise the outer loop control variable is messed up, and we end
up with uninitialized axes if there were any more valuators after
the XIKeyClass one.
This bug was sneakily introduced by fdb9a8e14, many thanks to
Carlos Soriano for helping spot the source of this bug.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=753431
We used to "invalidate" scroll valuators, so the next scroll event could
be used as the base for the next scroll deltas. This has the inconvenience
that it invariably consumes the first event received after enter and,
due to interactions with WM overeager passive button grabs, there's a
possibility we don't scroll at all if we receive interleaved "smooth
scroll" XI_Motion events and XI_Enter events (Normally triggered by regular
scroll wheels in mice).
In order to fix this, and at the expense of some sync-call overhead on
XI_Enter events (one XIQueryDevice call per slave device), query the
current scroll valuator state for all the slaves of the entered pointer,
so we do know beforehand the right base values. If new devices are plugged
while the pointer is on top of the client, the initialized scroll values
will match the valuators'.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=750994https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=750870
And use these for the missing axes if the valuator mask is incomplete.
This used to work fine on tablets because the Wacom driver ensures all
valuators are sent, which is not true if using the evdev driver.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=703610
This fixes potential assertions if a GTK+ app gets to receive
a XINotifyPassiveGrab/Ungrab pointer crossing event, currently
triggerable by XIGrabEnter passive grabs.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=719762
Scroll valuators were being just appended again and again, leading
to 1) a growing memory issue anytime a device changed 2) the first
scroll valuators to stay permanent on the application lifetime, as
the first stored valuators would always match.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705203
Passive grabs may take pointer focus out of the application, even though
the pointer didn't leave the window, but those events still trigger resetting
of the scroll axes. This is most visible with compiz, and possibly other
reparenting WMs, where passive grabs happen on the WM-managed window that
is a parent of the application toplevel.
As it is not possible to have scrolling happening on the timespan a passive
grab takes action, it is entirely safe for GTK+ to assume none happened if
it gets a crossing event of that nature.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=699574#c33
This information will be useful in case someone stumbles on a situation
similar to https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=699574, so we can
figure out where do the crossing events come from or go to easily.
It's been reported in several applications that scrolling feels jerky
since commit cc7b3985b3.
Investigation reported that the combination of passive 4-7 button grabs
on the toplevel and the presence of native subwindows might trigger
too often crossing events from the child window to the toplevel and
back as scroll "buttons" trigger the passive grab. Those crossing events
would reset the scroll valuators rendering scrolling from jerky on
touchpads (where there's intermediate smooth events between the emulated
button ones) to ineffective on regular mouse wheels (where the crossing
event would reset the valuators right before the single smooth scroll
event we get is delivered)
So, only reset scroll valuators when the pointer enters the toplevel
(we only care about this when the pointer is on the window after it's
been possibly scrolling somewhere else), and it doesn't come from an
inferior.
The situations where this happened varied though, the native subwindow
could be one created explicitly by the application, or created indirectly
through gdk_window_ensure_native(). The latter was mainly the case for
evolution (through gtk_selection_set_owner()) and any GtkScrolledWindow
under the oxygen-gtk3 theme (through gdk_window_set_composited())
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=699574
If you set GDK_SCALE=2 in the environment then all windows will be
scaled by 2. Its not an ideal solution as it doesn't handle
multi-monitors at different scales, and only affects gtk apps.
But it is a good starting points and will help a lot on HiDPI
laptops.
Add missing check in gdk_x11_device_manager_xi2_get_window(), returning
NULL if no valid XI2Event* has been found. Calling code seems to be
prepared to handle NULLs coming from this function, so it should be
safe enough (e.g. check gdk_event_source_get_filter_window()).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700465
On crossing events resulting from moving windows (eg. workspace switch),
deviceid equals sourceid, so make those reset scroll valuators on all
slave devices to avoid misleading jumps in scroll events
Fixes https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=690275
If we get a focus event for a X window we don't recognize, just
ignore it and avoid a g-critical when
_gdk_device_manager_core_handle_focus() is called with a NULL window.
GtkPlug directly handles X KeyPress/Release events, instead of using
translation in GDK (which expects XI2 events for XI2). When this
was done, the handling of the group was stubbed out and never replaced.
Export gdk_keymap_x11_group_for_state() and gdk_keymap_x11_is_modifier()
so we can fill out the fields correctly.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=675167
Since the event will be ignored anyway after it's translated (slave
devices are disabled), don't let it run in the smooth scroll code path,
as it will burn our caches for the actual event we're interested in.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=673644
