... and use one controller per button instead of using it on the
switcher and then going through lots of pain attempting to find the
right button for the location under the mouse.
This is in particular relevant for the ::is-focus property, because
updating that one doesn't cause enter/leave events.
But it also checks that notify and enter/leave happen in the right
order.
Emit crossing events - with a new GTK_CROSSING_DROP type - like we do
for motion events. There is no more special casing for them.
Note that the gesture has not been updated yet, so some obscure behavior
may occur.
This allows treating drop events like touch events, which GTK groups by
event sequence.
It's a bit ugly that we just case the GdkDrop pointer, but event
sequences are only meant to be unique pointer ids, so it's fine.
And in particular, only do it if the widget doesn't use ALIGN_FILL.
This avoids lots of measuring in the common case and speeds up
size_allocate() by about 25%.
And because size_allocate() is the bottleneck in the fishbowl, this also
gets ~25% more fishies.
Widgets should be given the actual size they will be allocated, so they
can do something with it.
If they want to clamp themselves to their natural size, nothing's
stopping them, they know their natural size after all.
It's the native's job to request a 1px x 1px size, not the job of
gtk_widget_size_allocate()
Also saves 10% of size_allocate() time because checking for an interface
is really expensive.
FIXME: Is this necessary?
Could the surfaces just clamp to 1x1 themselves?
We recently declared that surfaces can decide on whatever size they want
so natives need to inspect the size they requested anyway.
We are using (dddd) variants to store colors in variants,
which is dangerous now that GdkRGBA members are just floats.
Avoid passsing the GdkRGBA members directly to any varargs
functions.
When a popup is already showing, and gdk_surface_present_popup() is
called, if the layout didn't change, we're not really interested in
relayouting.
In the future, we'll be able to get notified if position of the popup
would change by some environmental changes, but until then, just don't
support it.
Transforming identity by an other transform does not mean we need to
painstakingly apply the individual steps of other to construct a new
transform, it means we can just return other.
Or in math terms:
I * B = B
so just return B.
We don't want to expose the GtkCrossingData struct, and manually
feeding events to event controllers is not something we want to
encourage, going forward.
Split the focus tracking into a separate
GtkEventControllerFocus, and change the API one more time.
We are back to having ::focus-in and ::focus-out signals.
Update all users.
Add fields for direct descendents to GtkCrossingData,
and populate them when emitting focus change events.
Also add accessors for these fields to GtkEventControllerKey,
and verify that they are set properly in the focus test.
Not done yet: Do the same for pointer crossing events.
