[HB] Bitfield packing *is* very delicate
Fix the second instance.
This commit is contained in:
parent
ec90ee23b2
commit
2866d2974b
@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ typedef struct _hb_glyph_position_t {
|
|||||||
hb_position_t x_advance;
|
hb_position_t x_advance;
|
||||||
hb_position_t y_advance;
|
hb_position_t y_advance;
|
||||||
/* XXX these should all be replaced by "uint32_t internal" */
|
/* XXX these should all be replaced by "uint32_t internal" */
|
||||||
hb_bool_t new_advance :1; /* if set, the advance width values are
|
unsigned short new_advance :1; /* if set, the advance width values are
|
||||||
absolute, i.e., they won't be
|
absolute, i.e., they won't be
|
||||||
added to the original glyph's value
|
added to the original glyph's value
|
||||||
but rather replace them */
|
but rather replace them */
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user