ligatures can be also used in MarkBasePos lookups. (2001-03-17 Werner
Sun Sep 29 14:55:36 2002 Owen Taylor <otaylor@redhat.com> * pango/opentype/ftxgpos.c: ligatures can be also used in MarkBasePos lookups. (2001-03-17 Werner Lemberg)
This commit is contained in:
parent
a35dc445e8
commit
741993e0b1
@ -1941,7 +1941,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
/* Now comes the messiest part of the whole OpenType
|
||||
specification. At first glance, cursive connections seem easy
|
||||
to understand, but there are pitfalls! The reason is, that
|
||||
to understand, but there are pitfalls! The reason is that
|
||||
the specs don't mention how to compute the advance values
|
||||
resp. glyph offsets. I was told it would be an omission, to
|
||||
be fixed in the next OpenType version... Again many thanks to
|
||||
@ -2343,7 +2343,7 @@
|
||||
if ( error )
|
||||
return error;
|
||||
|
||||
/* now we search backwards for a base glyph */
|
||||
/* now we search backwards for a non-mark glyph */
|
||||
|
||||
i = 1;
|
||||
j = in->pos - 1;
|
||||
@ -2362,8 +2362,11 @@
|
||||
j--;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* The following assertion is too strong -- at least for mangal.ttf. */
|
||||
#if 0
|
||||
if ( property != TTO_BASE_GLYPH )
|
||||
return TTO_Err_Not_Covered;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
if ( i > in->pos )
|
||||
return TTO_Err_Not_Covered;
|
||||
@ -2751,7 +2754,7 @@
|
||||
if ( error )
|
||||
return error;
|
||||
|
||||
/* now we search backwards for a ligature */
|
||||
/* now we search backwards for a non-mark glyph */
|
||||
|
||||
i = 1;
|
||||
j = in->pos - 1;
|
||||
@ -2770,8 +2773,12 @@
|
||||
j--;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Similar to Lookup_MarkBasePos(), I suspect that this assertion is
|
||||
too strong, thus it is commented out. */
|
||||
#if 0
|
||||
if ( property != TTO_LIGATURE )
|
||||
return TTO_Err_Not_Covered;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
if ( i > in->pos )
|
||||
return TTO_Err_Not_Covered;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user