AuroraMiddleware/harfbuzz
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

Move set-digests into their own header file

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Behdad Esfahbod 2017-10-15 14:09:05 +02:00
parent 3c13e153fe
commit 826a1daf2f
4 changed files with 146 additions and 114 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

1
src/Makefile.sources
View File

@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ HB_BASE_sources = \
hb-ot-post-table.hh \
hb-ot-tag.cc \
hb-private.hh \
hb-set-digest-private.hh \
hb-set-private.hh \
hb-set.cc \
hb-shape.cc \

2
src/hb-ot-layout-private.hh
View File

@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
#include "hb-font-private.hh"
#include "hb-buffer-private.hh"
#include "hb-set-private.hh"
#include "hb-set-digest-private.hh"
#include "hb-open-type-private.hh"

144
src/hb-set-digest-private.hh Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,144 @@
/*
* Copyright © 2012 Google, Inc.
*
* This is part of HarfBuzz, a text shaping library.
*
* Permission is hereby granted, without written agreement and without
* license or royalty fees, to use, copy, modify, and distribute this
* software and its documentation for any purpose, provided that the
* above copyright notice and the following two paragraphs appear in
* all copies of this software.
*
* IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER BE LIABLE TO ANY PARTY FOR
* DIRECT, INDIRECT, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES
* ARISING OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE AND ITS DOCUMENTATION, EVEN
* IF THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
* DAMAGE.
*
* THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS ANY WARRANTIES, INCLUDING,
* BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. THE SOFTWARE PROVIDED HEREUNDER IS
* ON AN "AS IS" BASIS, AND THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER HAS NO OBLIGATION TO
* PROVIDE MAINTENANCE, SUPPORT, UPDATES, ENHANCEMENTS, OR MODIFICATIONS.
*
* Google Author(s): Behdad Esfahbod
*/
#ifndef HB_SET_DIGEST_PRIVATE_HH
#define HB_SET_DIGEST_PRIVATE_HH
#include "hb-private.hh"
/*
* The set digests here implement various "filters" that support
* "approximate member query". Conceptually these are like Bloom
* Filter and Quotient Filter, however, much smaller, faster, and
* designed to fit the requirements of our uses for glyph coverage
* queries.
*
* Our filters are highly accurate if the lookup covers fairly local
* set of glyphs, but fully flooded and ineffective if coverage is
* all over the place.
*
* The frozen-set can be used instead of a digest, to trade more
* memory for 100% accuracy, but in practice, that doesn't look like
* an attractive trade-off.
*/
template <typename mask_t, unsigned int shift>
struct hb_set_digest_lowest_bits_t
{
ASSERT_POD ();
static const unsigned int mask_bytes = sizeof (mask_t);
static const unsigned int mask_bits = sizeof (mask_t) * 8;
static const unsigned int num_bits = 0
+ (mask_bytes >= 1 ? 3 : 0)
+ (mask_bytes >= 2 ? 1 : 0)
+ (mask_bytes >= 4 ? 1 : 0)
+ (mask_bytes >= 8 ? 1 : 0)
+ (mask_bytes >= 16? 1 : 0)
+ 0;
static_assert ((shift < sizeof (hb_codepoint_t) * 8), "");
static_assert ((shift + num_bits <= sizeof (hb_codepoint_t) * 8), "");
inline void init (void) {
mask = 0;
}
inline void add (hb_codepoint_t g) {
mask |= mask_for (g);
}
inline void add_range (hb_codepoint_t a, hb_codepoint_t b) {
if ((b >> shift) - (a >> shift) >= mask_bits - 1)
mask = (mask_t) -1;
else {
mask_t ma = mask_for (a);
mask_t mb = mask_for (b);
mask |= mb + (mb - ma) - (mb < ma);
}
}
inline bool may_have (hb_codepoint_t g) const {
return !!(mask & mask_for (g));
}
private:
static inline mask_t mask_for (hb_codepoint_t g) {
return ((mask_t) 1) << ((g >> shift) & (mask_bits - 1));
}
mask_t mask;
};
template <typename head_t, typename tail_t>
struct hb_set_digest_combiner_t
{
ASSERT_POD ();
inline void init (void) {
head.init ();
tail.init ();
}
inline void add (hb_codepoint_t g) {
head.add (g);
tail.add (g);
}
inline void add_range (hb_codepoint_t a, hb_codepoint_t b) {
head.add_range (a, b);
tail.add_range (a, b);
}
inline bool may_have (hb_codepoint_t g) const {
return head.may_have (g) && tail.may_have (g);
}
private:
head_t head;
tail_t tail;
};
/*
* hb_set_digest_t
*
* This is a combination of digests that performs "best".
* There is not much science to this: it's a result of intuition
* and testing.
*/
typedef hb_set_digest_combiner_t
<
hb_set_digest_lowest_bits_t<unsigned long, 4>,
hb_set_digest_combiner_t
<
hb_set_digest_lowest_bits_t<unsigned long, 0>,
hb_set_digest_lowest_bits_t<unsigned long, 9>
>
> hb_set_digest_t;
#endif /* HB_SET_DIGEST_PRIVATE_HH */

113
src/hb-set-private.hh
View File

@ -31,119 +31,6 @@
#include "hb-object-private.hh"
/*
* The set digests here implement various "filters" that support
* "approximate member query". Conceptually these are like Bloom
* Filter and Quotient Filter, however, much smaller, faster, and
* designed to fit the requirements of our uses for glyph coverage
* queries.
*
* Our filters are highly accurate if the lookup covers fairly local
* set of glyphs, but fully flooded and ineffective if coverage is
* all over the place.
*
* The frozen-set can be used instead of a digest, to trade more
* memory for 100% accuracy, but in practice, that doesn't look like
* an attractive trade-off.
*/
template <typename mask_t, unsigned int shift>
struct hb_set_digest_lowest_bits_t
{
ASSERT_POD ();
static const unsigned int mask_bytes = sizeof (mask_t);
static const unsigned int mask_bits = sizeof (mask_t) * 8;
static const unsigned int num_bits = 0
+ (mask_bytes >= 1 ? 3 : 0)
+ (mask_bytes >= 2 ? 1 : 0)
+ (mask_bytes >= 4 ? 1 : 0)
+ (mask_bytes >= 8 ? 1 : 0)
+ (mask_bytes >= 16? 1 : 0)
+ 0;
static_assert ((shift < sizeof (hb_codepoint_t) * 8), "");
static_assert ((shift + num_bits <= sizeof (hb_codepoint_t) * 8), "");
inline void init (void) {
mask = 0;
}
inline void add (hb_codepoint_t g) {
mask |= mask_for (g);
}
inline void add_range (hb_codepoint_t a, hb_codepoint_t b) {
if ((b >> shift) - (a >> shift) >= mask_bits - 1)
mask = (mask_t) -1;
else {
mask_t ma = mask_for (a);
mask_t mb = mask_for (b);
mask |= mb + (mb - ma) - (mb < ma);
}
}
inline bool may_have (hb_codepoint_t g) const {
return !!(mask & mask_for (g));
}
private:
static inline mask_t mask_for (hb_codepoint_t g) {
return ((mask_t) 1) << ((g >> shift) & (mask_bits - 1));
}
mask_t mask;
};
template <typename head_t, typename tail_t>
struct hb_set_digest_combiner_t
{
ASSERT_POD ();
inline void init (void) {
head.init ();
tail.init ();
}
inline void add (hb_codepoint_t g) {
head.add (g);
tail.add (g);
}
inline void add_range (hb_codepoint_t a, hb_codepoint_t b) {
head.add_range (a, b);
tail.add_range (a, b);
}
inline bool may_have (hb_codepoint_t g) const {
return head.may_have (g) && tail.may_have (g);
}
private:
head_t head;
tail_t tail;
};
/*
* hb_set_digest_t
*
* This is a combination of digests that performs "best".
* There is not much science to this: it's a result of intuition
* and testing.
*/
typedef hb_set_digest_combiner_t
<
hb_set_digest_lowest_bits_t<unsigned long, 4>,
hb_set_digest_combiner_t
<
hb_set_digest_lowest_bits_t<unsigned long, 0>,
hb_set_digest_lowest_bits_t<unsigned long, 9>
>
> hb_set_digest_t;
/*
* hb_set_t
*/